Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.WordOrder.Studies.Greenberg1963

Greenberg 1963: Implicational Universals on Basic Word Order #

@cite{greenberg-1963} @cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}

@cite{greenberg-1963} stated 45 cross-linguistic implicational universals on basic constituent order, adposition order, and related construction-pair correlations. This file formalises three of the most cited, tested over a curated 15-language Fragment-derived sample:

All three are tested over fragmentSample, a 15-language Fragment-derived sample. The substrate type ImplicationalUniversal lives in Linglib/Typology/Universal.lean. WALS-aggregate distributional claims (SOV-most-common, SV-dominates-VS, etc.) live in Studies/DryerHaspelmath2013.lean.

The 15-language sample bundles each language's Fragment-sourced WordOrderProfile (Ch 81/82/83) and Option AdpositionOrder (Ch 85). Per- language data lives in Fragments/{Lang}/{WordOrder,Adposition}.lean; the sample just bundles them with an ISO code and a human-readable name. Sample shape is hand-curated to span the four major basic-order classes — Tzotzil (VOS) and Hixkaryana (OVS) are deliberately included so U1's "object- initial languages exist but are rare" statistical character can be tested non-vacuously.

A sample-language entry for the Greenberg / cross-chapter theorems: Fragment-sourced word-order profile plus adposition order.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Hand-verified 15-language sample spanning the four major basic-order classes (SOV, SVO, VSO, plus a couple non-SVO entries) with adposition data attested in WALS. Used for stating cross-linguistic Greenbergian universals via Typology.ImplicationalUniversal.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          @[reducible, inline]

          Language has WALS basic order VSO.

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[reducible, inline]

            Language has WALS basic order SOV.

            Equations
            Instances For
              @[reducible, inline]

              Language is classified as prepositional in WALS Ch 85.

              Equations
              Instances For
                @[reducible, inline]

                Language is classified as postpositional in WALS Ch 85.

                Equations
                Instances For
                  @[reducible, inline]

                  Language is OV (object precedes verb) per WALS Ch 83. @cite{dryer-1992}'s primary classification under BDT.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    @cite{greenberg-1963} Universal 1: in declarative sentences with nominal subject and object, the subject almost always precedes the object. Tested over fragmentSample: subject-before-object entries (SOV + SVO + VSO) outnumber object-before-subject entries (VOS + OVS + OSV) by more than 4×. The sample's three object-initial languages (Tzotzil VOS, Hixkaryana OVS, K'iche' VOS) give a non-trivial margin; the multiplier is sample-dependent (Greenberg's claim is "almost always", not a specific ratio).

                    @cite{greenberg-1963} Universal 3: "Languages with dominant VSO order are always prepositional." Tested over fragmentSample; antecedent is triggered by Arabic, Welsh, Irish, all of which are prepositional.

                    @cite{greenberg-1963} Universal 4: "With overwhelmingly greater than chance frequency, languages with normal SOV order are postpositional." Tested over fragmentSample; antecedent triggers Japanese, Korean, Turkish, Hindi, and Basque — all postpositional in WALS.

                    @cite{dryer-1992}'s Branching Direction Theory primary correlation, stated as an implicational universal: in the sample, every OV (object-precedes-verb) language is postpositional.

                    Greenbergian U4 above commits to BasicOrder.IsSOV (SOV-specific) as the antecedent; Dryer's BDT primary commits to OVOrder.IsOV (covers SOV + OVS + OSV under one head-direction predicate). Both hold over the curated sample; they would diverge on a language with BasicOrder.noDominant Ch 81 + dominant .ov Ch 83 — exactly the Greenbergian-vs-Dryerian primacy choice flagged in Typology.WordOrder's module docstring.