Greenberg 1963: Implicational Universals on Basic Word Order #
@cite{greenberg-1963} @cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}
@cite{greenberg-1963} stated 45 cross-linguistic implicational universals on basic constituent order, adposition order, and related construction-pair correlations. This file formalises three of the most cited, tested over a curated 15-language Fragment-derived sample:
- Universal 1: subject-before-object orders (SOV + SVO + VSO) dominate over object-before-subject orders (VOS + OVS + OSV).
- Universal 3: VSO languages are prepositional.
- Universal 4: SOV languages are postpositional (with overwhelmingly greater than chance frequency).
All three are tested over fragmentSample, a 15-language Fragment-derived
sample. The substrate type ImplicationalUniversal lives in
Linglib/Typology/Universal.lean. WALS-aggregate distributional claims
(SOV-most-common, SV-dominates-VS, etc.) live in
Studies/DryerHaspelmath2013.lean.
The 15-language sample bundles each language's Fragment-sourced
WordOrderProfile (Ch 81/82/83) and Option AdpositionOrder (Ch 85). Per-
language data lives in Fragments/{Lang}/{WordOrder,Adposition}.lean; the
sample just bundles them with an ISO code and a human-readable name. Sample
shape is hand-curated to span the four major basic-order classes — Tzotzil
(VOS) and Hixkaryana (OVS) are deliberately included so U1's "object-
initial languages exist but are rare" statistical character can be tested
non-vacuously.
A sample-language entry for the Greenberg / cross-chapter theorems: Fragment-sourced word-order profile plus adposition order.
- iso : String
- name : String
- wordOrder : Typology.WordOrder.WordOrderProfile
- adposition : Typology.Adposition.AdpositionOrder
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hand-verified 15-language sample spanning the four major basic-order
classes (SOV, SVO, VSO, plus a couple non-SVO entries) with adposition
data attested in WALS. Used for stating cross-linguistic Greenbergian
universals via Typology.ImplicationalUniversal.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Language has WALS basic order VSO.
Equations
Instances For
Language has WALS basic order SOV.
Equations
Instances For
Subject-before-object basic orders (SOV, SVO, VSO).
Equations
Instances For
Object-before-subject basic orders (VOS, OVS, OSV).
Equations
Instances For
Language is classified as prepositional in WALS Ch 85.
Instances For
Language is classified as postpositional in WALS Ch 85.
Equations
Instances For
Language is OV (object precedes verb) per WALS Ch 83. @cite{dryer-1992}'s primary classification under BDT.
Equations
Instances For
@cite{greenberg-1963} Universal 1: in declarative sentences with nominal
subject and object, the subject almost always precedes the object.
Tested over fragmentSample: subject-before-object entries (SOV + SVO +
VSO) outnumber object-before-subject entries (VOS + OVS + OSV) by more
than 4×. The sample's three object-initial languages (Tzotzil VOS,
Hixkaryana OVS, K'iche' VOS) give a non-trivial margin; the multiplier
is sample-dependent (Greenberg's claim is "almost always", not a
specific ratio).
@cite{greenberg-1963} Universal 3: "Languages with dominant VSO order
are always prepositional." Tested over fragmentSample; antecedent is
triggered by Arabic, Welsh, Irish, all of which are prepositional.
@cite{greenberg-1963} Universal 4: "With overwhelmingly greater than
chance frequency, languages with normal SOV order are postpositional."
Tested over fragmentSample; antecedent triggers Japanese, Korean,
Turkish, Hindi, and Basque — all postpositional in WALS.
@cite{dryer-1992}'s Branching Direction Theory primary correlation, stated as an implicational universal: in the sample, every OV (object-precedes-verb) language is postpositional.
Greenbergian U4 above commits to BasicOrder.IsSOV (SOV-specific)
as the antecedent; Dryer's BDT primary commits to OVOrder.IsOV
(covers SOV + OVS + OSV under one head-direction predicate). Both
hold over the curated sample; they would diverge on a language with
BasicOrder.noDominant Ch 81 + dominant .ov Ch 83 — exactly the
Greenbergian-vs-Dryerian primacy choice flagged in
Typology.WordOrder's module docstring.