K'iche' word-order profile @cite{mondloch-2017} @cite{clemens-coon-2018} #
K'iche' is not coded in WALS Chs 81/82/83 (ISO quc is absent), so
the profile is grammar-grounded from @cite{mondloch-2017} rather than
via WordOrderProfile.ofWALS. Mondloch documents verb-initial order:
VS for intransitives and VOS for transitives.
A contested classification #
The .vos choice follows Mondloch's preferred-order analysis. The
broader Mayanist literature on basic word order in K'iche'an (and
Mayan more generally) is contested: K'iche' admits both VOS and VSO
for transitive clauses, with subject-initial orders increasingly
attested under Spanish contact. Sister-language WALS codings
illustrate the divergence — Kaqchikel cak is .vos in Ch 81,
Tzutujil tzj is .noDominantOrder, Mam mam is .vso (different
branch but verb-initial). @cite{clemens-coon-2018} surveys
derivational accounts of verb-initiality across Mayan; an alternative
substrate commitment would be .noDominant (parallel to Tzutujil) or
.vso per a corpus analysis. The Fragment commits to .vos because
that is Mondloch's explicit description; consumers wanting a different
basic-order claim should override. The .vs svOrder + .vo ovOrder
commitments are robust across the contestation (K'iche' is verb-
initial in both intransitive and transitive clauses).
K'iche' word-order profile, grammar-grounded from
@cite{mondloch-2017} ("the preferred word order appears to be:
verb-subject", with VOS for transitives). Not in WALS Chs
81/82/83 — fields override .notInWALS. The .vos basic-order
commitment is contested across Mayanist literature; see module
docstring.
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Kiche.wordOrder = { basicOrder := Typology.WordOrder.BasicOrder.vos, svOrder := Typology.WordOrder.SVOrder.vs, ovOrder := Typology.WordOrder.OVOrder.vo }
Instances For
Drift sentinel: the profile is internally consistent.