Longobardi (2005): Toward a Unified Grammar of Reference #
@cite{longobardi-2005} @cite{longobardi-1994}
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24(1): 5–44.
Core Contribution #
A syntax–semantics mapping theory reducing reference to nominal head position: a nominal refers to an individual (constant) iff its D position contains referential content. This unifies object reference and kind reference under a single structural generalization.
The paper rests on two axioms and a licensing condition, from which the Core Generalization — reference (to individuals) iff N-to-D — follows as a theorem.
Axioms #
- (52) Denotation Hypothesis: individuals are denoted in D.
- (53) Licensing Condition: arguments denote individuals.
- (54) Constants vs Variables: a referential value is constant if a lexically referential expression occupies (or chains to) D; otherwise the argument is a variable bound by an operator.
Derived Theorems #
- (55) arguments with empty D are variables.
- (56) an argument is a constant only if D contains a lexically referential expression.
- (33) Core Generalization: reference (to individuals) iff N-to-D.
File Structure #
§1–§4 formalize the axioms, derived theorems, and noun taxonomy.
§5–§7 formalize the Last Resort consequences and the bridge to the
character semantics of Reference/Basic. §8–§13 instantiate the
theory: N-to-D raising as head movement, Italian solo diagnostic,
expletive articles, and the bridge to @cite{longobardi-2001}'s
DPParameter/ArgumentType.
The four classes of nominal heads, ranked from most prototypically referential (pronouns) to least (common nouns).
@cite{longobardi-2005} table (28): these four classes are distinguished by three tests — object-referentiality (in D), predicative restrictions (not in D), and kind-referentiality (with definite article).
- pronoun : NominalHeadClass
Always in D in all argument environments. Object-referential only. Cannot function predicatively or as kind-denoting expressions.
- properName : NominalHeadClass
Raise to D obligatorily in argument function (Romance). Object-referential. Predicative use conditioned. No kind reading.
- specialCommon : NominalHeadClass
Raise to D only under special conditions (genitive modifier, deictic context). Object-referential when raised. Full predicative use. Kind-referential with definite article. Examples: casa 'home', mamma 'mom', lunedì 'Monday'.
- commonNoun : NominalHeadClass
Never raise to D. Never object-referential. Full predicative use. Kind-referential with definite article.
Instances For
Equations
- Longobardi2005.instDecidableEqNominalHeadClass x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Object-referential: the nominal can denote a specific object (individual in Carlson's sense) by occupying the D position.
Equations
- Longobardi2005.ObjectReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.pronoun = True
- Longobardi2005.ObjectReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName = True
- Longobardi2005.ObjectReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.specialCommon = True
- Longobardi2005.ObjectReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.commonNoun = False
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Can function as a predicate (i.e., survive without D).
Equations
- Longobardi2005.CanBePredicate Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.pronoun = False
- Longobardi2005.CanBePredicate Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName = True
- Longobardi2005.CanBePredicate Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.specialCommon = True
- Longobardi2005.CanBePredicate Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.commonNoun = True
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Kind-referential: can denote a kind when introduced by definite article.
Equations
- Longobardi2005.KindReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.pronoun = False
- Longobardi2005.KindReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName = False
- Longobardi2005.KindReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.specialCommon = True
- Longobardi2005.KindReferential Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.commonNoun = True
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Whether N-to-D raising is obligatory in argument position.
Equations
- Longobardi2005.RaisingObligatory Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.pronoun = True
- Longobardi2005.RaisingObligatory Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName = True
- Longobardi2005.RaisingObligatory Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.specialCommon = False
- Longobardi2005.RaisingObligatory Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.commonNoun = False
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
The scalar hierarchy of properness from @cite{longobardi-2005} (25).
Nominal expressions are ranked along a scale from most prototypically proper-like to most common-like. Access to the N-to-D derivational strategy decreases monotonically along this scale.
a. Pronouns: always in D. b. Names of persons, geographical units: raise whenever D is empty. c. Names of days: raise only under particular semantic conditions. d. Casa, kinship terms: raise only if followed by genitive modifier. e. Normal common nouns: never raise.
Equations
- Longobardi2005.propernessRank Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.pronoun = 0
- Longobardi2005.propernessRank Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName = 1
- Longobardi2005.propernessRank Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.specialCommon = 2
- Longobardi2005.propernessRank Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.commonNoun = 3
Instances For
Raising access decreases monotonically with properness rank: if class c₁ is more proper than c₂, then c₁'s raising is at least as obligatory as c₂'s.
The lexical type of a noun: whether it names objects or kinds.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §4: nouns lexically divide into object-naming (proper names, pronouns — intrinsically referential) and kind-naming (common nouns — denote kinds, not individuals).
- objectNaming : LexicalNamingType
Object-naming: learning the name means learning to apply it to a particular object. Proper names, pronouns.
- kindNaming : LexicalNamingType
Kind-naming: learning the name means learning to recognize a potentially open set of objects. Common nouns.
Instances For
Equations
- Longobardi2005.instDecidableEqLexicalNamingType x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
A nominal argument configuration, capturing the syntactic and semantic state of a DP in argument position.
- namingType : LexicalNamingType
The head noun's lexical naming type.
- dHasReferentialContent : Bool
Does D contain a lexically referential expression? (either an overt determiner/quantifier, or N raised to D, or an expletive article linked to a raised N in a CHAIN)
- isArgument : Bool
Is the nominal in argument function?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
(52) Denotation Hypothesis: individuals are denoted in D.
The D position is the locus of referential interpretation. A nominal denotes an individual (object or kind) iff its D position is associated with referential content.
Equations
Instances For
(53) Licensing Condition: arguments denote individuals.
Full Interpretation requires arguments to have a referential value (whether constant or variable).
Equations
- Longobardi2005.argumentLicensed nc = (!nc.isArgument || Longobardi2005.denotesIndividual nc)
Instances For
(54a) A constant: a fixed referential value denoting one and only one entity (kind or object). Requires D to contain (or CHAIN-link to) a lexically referential expression — either a raised N, an overt determiner, or a pronoun base-generated in D.
Equations
Instances For
(54b) A variable: bound by an operator (existential, generic, or the variable-binding force of a lexical determiner) and ranging over a set of entities. Arises when D is empty (no referential content).
Equations
Instances For
(55) Arguments with empty D are variables.
From (52)+(53)+(54): if D is empty, then by (52) the nominal cannot denote an individual via D. By (53) it must still denote (being an argument). By (54b) the only remaining option is variable interpretation.
(56) An argument is a constant only if D contains a lexically referential expression.
Equivalently: constant interpretation requires N-to-D (for proper names), an overt determiner, or a pronoun in D.
(41) A nominal is an argument only if introduced by D.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §7: this principle, from @cite{szabolcsi-1987} and @cite{stowell-1989-1991}, is derived from (52)+(53). In non-argument environments (predicates, vocatives, exclamations), nominals can occur without D.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §10, question (57c): why must proper names raise?
Object-naming nouns cannot satisfy (54b) — they name objects, not kinds, so they cannot enter the interpretive formula Dx.x ∈ kind(N) that gives variables their meaning. Their only route to argumenthood is constant interpretation via (54a), which requires D content. Since proper names are bare (no overt determiner), they must raise N-to-D to fill D.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §10, question (57a): why do common nouns not have to raise?
Kind-naming nouns can satisfy (54b): they name kinds, so they can enter the formula Dx.x ∈ kind(N) as the restrictor of a variable. Empty D yields a variable bound by an existential or generic operator. No raising is needed for convergence.
Whether a definite article is expletive (semantically vacuous placeholder) or a genuine semantic operator.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §8: when a proper name appears with a definite article (la Maria, il Gianni), the article is expletive — it does not contribute uniqueness or familiarity semantics. It merely fills the D position that N-raising would otherwise occupy.
- expletive : ArticleType
Expletive: phonological placeholder for D, no semantic content. Forms a CHAIN with the noun. la Maria ≈ Maria raised to D.
- operator : ArticleType
Semantic operator: contributes uniqueness (ι), familiarity, or quantificational force. il tavolo 'the table' — real definite.
Instances For
Equations
- Longobardi2005.instDecidableEqArticleType x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Longobardi2005.instReprArticleType = { reprPrec := Longobardi2005.instReprArticleType.repr }
An expletive article does not induce kind readings.
@cite{longobardi-2005} (46)–(47): la Maria behaves identically to bare Maria — wide scope, rigid, no generic/kind reading. This distinguishes expletive articles from genuine definite operators, which CAN induce kind readings (i cani 'the dogs' = the dog-kind).
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Proper names in D are directly referential.
Bridge connecting the syntactic analysis (N-to-D raising creates constant interpretation) to the semantic analysis (proper names have constant character and rigid content). The two perspectives converge: syntactically, D is the locus of reference; semantically, proper names are rigid designators.
N-to-D raising is head-to-head movement within the nominal extended projection.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §5: proper names in Romance undergo N-to-D raising — the noun head moves from N to D, crossing intervening material (adjectives, modifiers in α). This is the nominal analogue of V-to-T raising (@cite{pollock-1989}).
The movement is head-to-head (not head-to-spec): the noun stays minimal and reprojects in D. Evidence: the raised name forms a morphological unit with D, not a phrasal specifier.
- nHead : NominalHeadClass
The N head (proper name or special common noun)
- dpParam : Longobardi2001.DPParameter
Language parametric setting
- raises : Bool
Raising actually occurs
- obligatory : Bool
Raising is obligatory (convergence requires it)
Instances For
Italian proper names raise obligatorily to D.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §5: Gianni ha telefonato vs *Ha telefonato Gianni (in neutral intonation). The name must precede adjectives and modifiers that intervene between N and D.
Equations
- Longobardi2005.italianPN = { nHead := Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName, dpParam := Longobardi2001.romance, raises := true, obligatory := true }
Instances For
Italian common nouns do NOT raise to D.
Equations
- Longobardi2005.italianCN = { nHead := Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.commonNoun, dpParam := Longobardi2001.romance, raises := false, obligatory := false }
Instances For
English proper names: D is weak, so raising is vacuous (no overt D to target). Names occur bare in argument position.
Equations
- Longobardi2005.englishPN = { nHead := Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName, dpParam := Longobardi2001.english, raises := false, obligatory := false }
Instances For
@cite{longobardi-2005} §2: the solo paradigm. Solo 'only' is an adverb that must c-command its associate. When solo precedes a proper name but follows a common noun, this diagnoses the structural position of the noun head.
- Solo Gianni... — name has raised past solo (N-to-D)
- Il solo tavolo... — common noun stays below solo
This asymmetry is the primary diagnostic for N-to-D.
- headClass : NominalHeadClass
The noun tested
- precedesSolo : Bool
Does the noun precede solo?
Instances For
Proper names precede solo (they have raised past it).
Equations
- Longobardi2005.soloPN = { headClass := Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.properName, precedesSolo := true }
Instances For
Common nouns follow solo (they remain in situ).
Equations
- Longobardi2005.soloCN = { headClass := Longobardi2005.NominalHeadClass.commonNoun, precedesSolo := false }
Instances For
The solo diagnostic confirms raising iff precedesSolo.
@cite{longobardi-2005} §8: Italian proper names optionally appear with a definite article (la Maria, il Gianni). This article is expletive — semantically vacuous, serving only as a phonological placeholder for D.
Evidence: la Maria behaves identically to bare Maria:
- Wide scope only (no narrow scope under quantifiers)
- Rigid reference (same individual at every world)
- No kind/generic reading This contrasts with genuine definite articles (il tavolo 'the table'), which CAN have narrow scope and kind readings.
- form : String
The nominal expression
- articleType : ArticleType
Article type
- wideScopeOnly : Bool
Has wide scope only (rigid)
- kindReading : Bool
Admits kind/generic reading
Instances For
Equations
- Longobardi2005.laMaria = { form := "la Maria", articleType := Longobardi2005.ArticleType.expletive, wideScopeOnly := true, kindReading := false }
Instances For
Equations
- Longobardi2005.ilTavolo = { form := "il tavolo", articleType := Longobardi2005.ArticleType.operator, wideScopeOnly := false, kindReading := true }
Instances For
Expletive articles block kind readings; operator articles allow them.
Expletive articles preserve rigidity (wide scope only).
Map @cite{longobardi-2001}'s ArgumentType to the topological
mapping's constant/variable distinction.
Referential arguments = constants (D has referential content). Quantificational arguments = variables (D is empty, operator-bound).
Equations
- Longobardi2005.argumentTypeToConfig Longobardi2001.ArgumentType.referential = { namingType := Longobardi2005.LexicalNamingType.objectNaming, dHasReferentialContent := true, isArgument := true }
- Longobardi2005.argumentTypeToConfig Longobardi2001.ArgumentType.quantificational = { namingType := Longobardi2005.LexicalNamingType.kindNaming, dHasReferentialContent := false, isArgument := true }
Instances For
Referential arguments are constants in the topological mapping.
Quantificational arguments are variables in the topological mapping.
@cite{longobardi-2001}'s strongD parameter corresponds to the
topological mapping's requirement for overt referential content in D.
When D is strong (Romance), referential interpretation requires visible association with D — either N-to-D raising or an overt determiner. When D is weak (English), the association can be covert.
Greek confirms the prediction: strong D + opaque α forces overt articles on all referential arguments including proper names.