Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Reference.Studies.Longobardi2005

Longobardi (2005): Toward a Unified Grammar of Reference #

@cite{longobardi-2005} @cite{longobardi-1994}

Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24(1): 5–44.

Core Contribution #

A syntax–semantics mapping theory reducing reference to nominal head position: a nominal refers to an individual (constant) iff its D position contains referential content. This unifies object reference and kind reference under a single structural generalization.

The paper rests on two axioms and a licensing condition, from which the Core Generalization — reference (to individuals) iff N-to-D — follows as a theorem.

Axioms #

Derived Theorems #

File Structure #

§1–§4 formalize the axioms, derived theorems, and noun taxonomy. §5–§7 formalize the Last Resort consequences and the bridge to the character semantics of Reference/Basic. §8–§13 instantiate the theory: N-to-D raising as head movement, Italian solo diagnostic, expletive articles, and the bridge to @cite{longobardi-2001}'s DPParameter/ArgumentType.

The four classes of nominal heads, ranked from most prototypically referential (pronouns) to least (common nouns).

@cite{longobardi-2005} table (28): these four classes are distinguished by three tests — object-referentiality (in D), predicative restrictions (not in D), and kind-referentiality (with definite article).

  • pronoun : NominalHeadClass

    Always in D in all argument environments. Object-referential only. Cannot function predicatively or as kind-denoting expressions.

  • properName : NominalHeadClass

    Raise to D obligatorily in argument function (Romance). Object-referential. Predicative use conditioned. No kind reading.

  • specialCommon : NominalHeadClass

    Raise to D only under special conditions (genitive modifier, deictic context). Object-referential when raised. Full predicative use. Kind-referential with definite article. Examples: casa 'home', mamma 'mom', lunedì 'Monday'.

  • commonNoun : NominalHeadClass

    Never raise to D. Never object-referential. Full predicative use. Kind-referential with definite article.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

      The scalar hierarchy of properness from @cite{longobardi-2005} (25).

      Nominal expressions are ranked along a scale from most prototypically proper-like to most common-like. Access to the N-to-D derivational strategy decreases monotonically along this scale.

      a. Pronouns: always in D. b. Names of persons, geographical units: raise whenever D is empty. c. Names of days: raise only under particular semantic conditions. d. Casa, kinship terms: raise only if followed by genitive modifier. e. Normal common nouns: never raise.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Raising access decreases monotonically with properness rank: if class c₁ is more proper than c₂, then c₁'s raising is at least as obligatory as c₂'s.

        The lexical type of a noun: whether it names objects or kinds.

        @cite{longobardi-2005} §4: nouns lexically divide into object-naming (proper names, pronouns — intrinsically referential) and kind-naming (common nouns — denote kinds, not individuals).

        • objectNaming : LexicalNamingType

          Object-naming: learning the name means learning to apply it to a particular object. Proper names, pronouns.

        • kindNaming : LexicalNamingType

          Kind-naming: learning the name means learning to recognize a potentially open set of objects. Common nouns.

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            A nominal argument configuration, capturing the syntactic and semantic state of a DP in argument position.

            • namingType : LexicalNamingType

              The head noun's lexical naming type.

            • dHasReferentialContent : Bool

              Does D contain a lexically referential expression? (either an overt determiner/quantifier, or N raised to D, or an expletive article linked to a raised N in a CHAIN)

            • isArgument : Bool

              Is the nominal in argument function?

            Instances For
              def Longobardi2005.instDecidableEqNominalConfig.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : NominalConfig) :
              Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  (52) Denotation Hypothesis: individuals are denoted in D.

                  The D position is the locus of referential interpretation. A nominal denotes an individual (object or kind) iff its D position is associated with referential content.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    (53) Licensing Condition: arguments denote individuals.

                    Full Interpretation requires arguments to have a referential value (whether constant or variable).

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      (54a) A constant: a fixed referential value denoting one and only one entity (kind or object). Requires D to contain (or CHAIN-link to) a lexically referential expression — either a raised N, an overt determiner, or a pronoun base-generated in D.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        (54b) A variable: bound by an operator (existential, generic, or the variable-binding force of a lexical determiner) and ranging over a set of entities. Arises when D is empty (no referential content).

                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          theorem Longobardi2005.empty_d_arguments_are_variables (nc : NominalConfig) (_hArg : nc.isArgument = true) (hEmptyD : nc.dHasReferentialContent = false) :
                          isVariable nc = true

                          (55) Arguments with empty D are variables.

                          From (52)+(53)+(54): if D is empty, then by (52) the nominal cannot denote an individual via D. By (53) it must still denote (being an argument). By (54b) the only remaining option is variable interpretation.

                          (56) An argument is a constant only if D contains a lexically referential expression.

                          Equivalently: constant interpretation requires N-to-D (for proper names), an overt determiner, or a pronoun in D.

                          theorem Longobardi2005.argument_requires_d (nc : NominalConfig) (hArg : nc.isArgument = true) (hLicensed : argumentLicensed nc = true) :

                          (41) A nominal is an argument only if introduced by D.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §7: this principle, from @cite{szabolcsi-1987} and @cite{stowell-1989-1991}, is derived from (52)+(53). In non-argument environments (predicates, vocatives, exclamations), nominals can occur without D.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §10, question (57c): why must proper names raise?

                          Object-naming nouns cannot satisfy (54b) — they name objects, not kinds, so they cannot enter the interpretive formula Dx.x ∈ kind(N) that gives variables their meaning. Their only route to argumenthood is constant interpretation via (54a), which requires D content. Since proper names are bare (no overt determiner), they must raise N-to-D to fill D.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §10, question (57a): why do common nouns not have to raise?

                          Kind-naming nouns can satisfy (54b): they name kinds, so they can enter the formula Dx.x ∈ kind(N) as the restrictor of a variable. Empty D yields a variable bound by an existential or generic operator. No raising is needed for convergence.

                          Whether a definite article is expletive (semantically vacuous placeholder) or a genuine semantic operator.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §8: when a proper name appears with a definite article (la Maria, il Gianni), the article is expletive — it does not contribute uniqueness or familiarity semantics. It merely fills the D position that N-raising would otherwise occupy.

                          • expletive : ArticleType

                            Expletive: phonological placeholder for D, no semantic content. Forms a CHAIN with the noun. la MariaMaria raised to D.

                          • operator : ArticleType

                            Semantic operator: contributes uniqueness (ι), familiarity, or quantificational force. il tavolo 'the table' — real definite.

                          Instances For
                            @[implicit_reducible]
                            Equations
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              An expletive article does not induce kind readings.

                              @cite{longobardi-2005} (46)–(47): la Maria behaves identically to bare Maria — wide scope, rigid, no generic/kind reading. This distinguishes expletive articles from genuine definite operators, which CAN induce kind readings (i cani 'the dogs' = the dog-kind).

                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                @[implicit_reducible]
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                Proper names in D are directly referential.

                                Bridge connecting the syntactic analysis (N-to-D raising creates constant interpretation) to the semantic analysis (proper names have constant character and rigid content). The two perspectives converge: syntactically, D is the locus of reference; semantically, proper names are rigid designators.

                                N-to-D raising is head-to-head movement within the nominal extended projection.

                                @cite{longobardi-2005} §5: proper names in Romance undergo N-to-D raising — the noun head moves from N to D, crossing intervening material (adjectives, modifiers in α). This is the nominal analogue of V-to-T raising (@cite{pollock-1989}).

                                The movement is head-to-head (not head-to-spec): the noun stays minimal and reprojects in D. Evidence: the raised name forms a morphological unit with D, not a phrasal specifier.

                                • The N head (proper name or special common noun)

                                • Language parametric setting

                                • raises : Bool

                                  Raising actually occurs

                                • obligatory : Bool

                                  Raising is obligatory (convergence requires it)

                                Instances For

                                  Italian proper names raise obligatorily to D.

                                  @cite{longobardi-2005} §5: Gianni ha telefonato vs *Ha telefonato Gianni (in neutral intonation). The name must precede adjectives and modifiers that intervene between N and D.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    Italian common nouns do NOT raise to D.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      English proper names: D is weak, so raising is vacuous (no overt D to target). Names occur bare in argument position.

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        @cite{longobardi-2005} §2: the solo paradigm. Solo 'only' is an adverb that must c-command its associate. When solo precedes a proper name but follows a common noun, this diagnoses the structural position of the noun head.

                                        • Solo Gianni... — name has raised past solo (N-to-D)
                                        • Il solo tavolo... — common noun stays below solo

                                        This asymmetry is the primary diagnostic for N-to-D.

                                        • headClass : NominalHeadClass

                                          The noun tested

                                        • precedesSolo : Bool

                                          Does the noun precede solo?

                                        Instances For

                                          Proper names precede solo (they have raised past it).

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            Common nouns follow solo (they remain in situ).

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              The solo diagnostic confirms raising iff precedesSolo.

                                              @cite{longobardi-2005} §8: Italian proper names optionally appear with a definite article (la Maria, il Gianni). This article is expletive — semantically vacuous, serving only as a phonological placeholder for D.

                                              Evidence: la Maria behaves identically to bare Maria:

                                              • Wide scope only (no narrow scope under quantifiers)
                                              • Rigid reference (same individual at every world)
                                              • No kind/generic reading This contrasts with genuine definite articles (il tavolo 'the table'), which CAN have narrow scope and kind readings.
                                              • form : String

                                                The nominal expression

                                              • articleType : ArticleType

                                                Article type

                                              • wideScopeOnly : Bool

                                                Has wide scope only (rigid)

                                              • kindReading : Bool

                                                Admits kind/generic reading

                                              Instances For
                                                Equations
                                                Instances For
                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For

                                                    Expletive articles block kind readings; operator articles allow them.

                                                    Expletive articles preserve rigidity (wide scope only).

                                                    Map @cite{longobardi-2001}'s ArgumentType to the topological mapping's constant/variable distinction.

                                                    Referential arguments = constants (D has referential content). Quantificational arguments = variables (D is empty, operator-bound).

                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For

                                                      Referential arguments are constants in the topological mapping.

                                                      Quantificational arguments are variables in the topological mapping.

                                                      @cite{longobardi-2001}'s strongD parameter corresponds to the topological mapping's requirement for overt referential content in D.

                                                      When D is strong (Romance), referential interpretation requires visible association with D — either N-to-D raising or an overt determiner. When D is weak (English), the association can be covert.

                                                      Greek confirms the prediction: strong D + opaque α forces overt articles on all referential arguments including proper names.