Dayal (2025): Three-layer cartography for clause-typing #
@cite{dayal-2025} @cite{mccloskey-2006} @cite{zu-2018} @cite{bhatt-dayal-2020}
Veneeta Dayal (2025), Linguistic Inquiry 56(4):663-712. Develops the
three-layer cartographic split [SAP [PerspP [CP ...]]] and uses it to
account for cross-linguistic clause-typing variation, the responsive/
rogative split, and McCloskey-style quasi-subordination.
This study file is the canonical home for:
- Clause-typing typology (§4.4): forced-CP vs delayed-PerspP variation
across English/Italian/Hindi-Urdu (formerly in
Phenomena/Questions/Typology.lean§B–C). - Hindi-Urdu shiftiness (§3.2): the McCloskey parallel for Hindi-Urdu
jaanna: (formerly in
Phenomena/Questions/Typology.lean§D). - Newari conjunct/disjunct (§5.2): the perspective-shift evidence
from Newari person marking (formerly in
Phenomena/Questions/Typology.lean§E). - Left-Periphery bridge: the verification of the LeftPeriphery
SelectionClassapparatus againstPhenomena.Questions.Embeddingdata and the cross-linguistic shiftiness data.
Cross-framework relations #
- Rizzi 1997 /
Theories/Syntax/Minimalist/Questions.leanplaces clause-typing atForce⁰[+Q]; Dayal places it atCwith a downstreamPerspPshift. The disagreement is real and not currently formalized as a bridge theorem. SeeTheories/Syntax/Minimalist/Questions.lean. - Holmberg 2016 /
Phenomena/Questions/Studies/Holmberg2016.leanplaces the polar-Q-typing locus atPolP(via theFeatures/AnsweringSystem.leantypological parameter). Holmberg's analysis competes with Dayal's for the same matrix-polar facts. - Speas-Tenny /
Theories/Syntax/Minimalist/SpeechActs.leanderivesseatOfKnowledgefrom a 2×2 feature matrix; Dayal places SoK in PerspP with PRO. Both predict the Newari conjunct/disjunct flip; the bridge theoremSpeechActs.SoK ↔ PerspP-PRO over Newariis unformalized.
How a language handles clause-typing for polar questions. The contrast
is the cartographic locus of [+Q]-typing, not a difference in feature
inventory. CP-typed languages license simplex polars in subordination
via a wh-complementizer (English whether, Italian se); PerspP-typed
languages route polar questions through a higher PerspP layer that does
not embed under canonical responsive predicates.
- cpTyped : ClauseTypingStrategy
Clause-typing locus is
C(Englishwhether, Italianse). - perspPTyped : ClauseTypingStrategy
Clause-typing locus is
PerspP(Hindi-Urdu rising intonation).
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.instDecidableEqClauseTypingStrategy x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Structural projection: which clause-typing strategies license simplex
polar questions in subordination. CP-typed languages do (the wh-
complementizer is the embedding selector); PerspP-typed languages do
not (PerspP is too high to be selected by canonical responsive verbs).
delayed_blocks_simplex_subordination below derives from this
projection together with the Fragment data, rather than holding
vacuously over a 1-element sample.
Equations
Instances For
Data on simplex polar question embedding across languages. A simplex polar question is just the nucleus p (no "or not").
- language : String
- clauseTyping : ClauseTypingStrategy
- matrixOk : Bool
Simplex polar in matrix?
- quasiSubOk : Bool
Simplex polar in quasi-subordination?
- subordinationOk : Bool
Simplex polar in subordination?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: simplex polar questions require PerspP (rising intonation activates [+WH] at PerspP level). No wh-complementizer → cannot clause-type at C. (Dayal 2025: ex (70)–(71); UNVERIFIED page numbers.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The Fragment data is consistent with the structural projection: every
PerspP-typed language in the sample lacks simplex-polar subordination.
Unlike a 1-direction stipulation, this connects per-language data to a
typed projection on ClauseTypingStrategy.
Corollary: PerspP-typed languages cannot subordinate simplex polars. Now derived from the structural projection, not from the data alone.
Whether declarative questions in a language are obligatorily biased.
English: "You drink wine?" is obligatorily biased (speaker expects yes).
Hindi-Urdu/Italian: rising declaratives can be neutral.
This follows from whether clause-typing is forced at C (CP-typed) or
routed through PerspP. (Italian neutralOk := true is contested in
the rising-declarative literature, e.g. Gunlogson 2003 vs Bartels 1999;
Dayal 2025 makes the specific claim — UNVERIFIED page numbers.)
- language : String
- neutralOk : Bool
Can a rising declarative be a neutral (unbiased) question?
- obligatorilyBiased : Bool
Is a rising declarative always biased?
- clauseTyping : ClauseTypingStrategy
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Cross-linguistic shiftiness data. Parallels McCloskey's English data. Hindi-Urdu kya: shows the same pattern as English embedded inversion: blocked under bare responsive, licensed under negation/questioning.
- language : String
- verb : String
- sentence : String
- negated : Bool
- questioned : Bool
- quasiSubOk : Bool
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: "want to know" (rogative) freely takes kya: (Dayal 2025: ex (39a)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: "know" (responsive) rejects kya: (Dayal 2025: ex (39b)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: "nobody knows" + kya: → OK (negation, Dayal 2025: ex (41a)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu: "does anyone know" + kya: → OK (questioning, Dayal 2025: ex (41b)).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu shiftiness parallels English: bare responsive blocks quasi-sub, negation and questioning license it.
Newari uses conjunct vs disjunct verb forms sensitive to whether the subject is coindexed with the perspectival center (Seat of Knowledge).
- Declaratives: conjunct = 1st person subject (SoK = speaker)
- Interrogatives: conjunct = 2nd person subject (SoK = addressee) This provides independent evidence for perspective shift in questions (canonical Newari conjunct/disjunct pattern; Zu 2018 reanalyses as perspective shift).
- language : String
- clauseType : String
- conjunctPerson : String
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.newari_declarative = { language := "Newari", clauseType := "declarative", conjunctPerson := "1st" }
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.newari_interrogative = { language := "Newari", clauseType := "interrogative", conjunctPerson := "2nd" }
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Classify each empirical datum from Phenomena.Questions.Embedding.
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "investigate" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativeCP
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "depend on" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativeCP
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "wonder" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativePerspP
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "ask" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativeSAP
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "know" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "care" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "matter" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb "believe" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.uninterrogative
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyVerb x✝ = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.uninterrogative
Instances For
The theory correctly predicts all embedding judgments from the data.
Shiftiness predictions match McCloskey's data for remember (responsive).
Classify Hindi-Urdu verbs from the cross-linguistic shiftiness data.
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyCrossLingVerb "ja:n-na: ca:h-na: (want to know)" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.rogativePerspP
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyCrossLingVerb "ja:n-na: (know)" = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025.classifyCrossLingVerb x✝ = Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.LeftPeriphery.SelectionClass.responsive
Instances For
Hindi-Urdu shiftiness follows the same derivation as English: responsive predicates reject quasi-sub in bare form, allow under negation/questioning. The theory predicts ALL cross-linguistic data.
Q-particle embedding follows from which left-peripheral layer they occupy. CP-layer particles appear in subordination; PerspP and SAP particles do not.
The structurally derived classification matches the manually-assigned string-based classification for all verbs in the embedding data.
String-based classification matches field-based derivation.