Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Questions.Studies.Dayal2025

Dayal (2025): Three-layer cartography for clause-typing #

@cite{dayal-2025} @cite{mccloskey-2006} @cite{zu-2018} @cite{bhatt-dayal-2020}

Veneeta Dayal (2025), Linguistic Inquiry 56(4):663-712. Develops the three-layer cartographic split [SAP [PerspP [CP ...]]] and uses it to account for cross-linguistic clause-typing variation, the responsive/ rogative split, and McCloskey-style quasi-subordination.

This study file is the canonical home for:

  1. Clause-typing typology (§4.4): forced-CP vs delayed-PerspP variation across English/Italian/Hindi-Urdu (formerly in Phenomena/Questions/Typology.lean §B–C).
  2. Hindi-Urdu shiftiness (§3.2): the McCloskey parallel for Hindi-Urdu jaanna: (formerly in Phenomena/Questions/Typology.lean §D).
  3. Newari conjunct/disjunct (§5.2): the perspective-shift evidence from Newari person marking (formerly in Phenomena/Questions/Typology.lean §E).
  4. Left-Periphery bridge: the verification of the LeftPeriphery SelectionClass apparatus against Phenomena.Questions.Embedding data and the cross-linguistic shiftiness data.

Cross-framework relations #

How a language handles clause-typing for polar questions. The contrast is the cartographic locus of [+Q]-typing, not a difference in feature inventory. CP-typed languages license simplex polars in subordination via a wh-complementizer (English whether, Italian se); PerspP-typed languages route polar questions through a higher PerspP layer that does not embed under canonical responsive predicates.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Structural projection: which clause-typing strategies license simplex polar questions in subordination. CP-typed languages do (the wh- complementizer is the embedding selector); PerspP-typed languages do not (PerspP is too high to be selected by canonical responsive verbs). delayed_blocks_simplex_subordination below derives from this projection together with the Fragment data, rather than holding vacuously over a 1-element sample.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Data on simplex polar question embedding across languages. A simplex polar question is just the nucleus p (no "or not").

        • language : String
        • clauseTyping : ClauseTypingStrategy
        • matrixOk : Bool

          Simplex polar in matrix?

        • quasiSubOk : Bool

          Simplex polar in quasi-subordination?

        • subordinationOk : Bool

          Simplex polar in subordination?

        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Hindi-Urdu: simplex polar questions require PerspP (rising intonation activates [+WH] at PerspP level). No wh-complementizer → cannot clause-type at C. (Dayal 2025: ex (70)–(71); UNVERIFIED page numbers.)

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    The Fragment data is consistent with the structural projection: every PerspP-typed language in the sample lacks simplex-polar subordination. Unlike a 1-direction stipulation, this connects per-language data to a typed projection on ClauseTypingStrategy.

                    Corollary: PerspP-typed languages cannot subordinate simplex polars. Now derived from the structural projection, not from the data alone.

                    Whether declarative questions in a language are obligatorily biased. English: "You drink wine?" is obligatorily biased (speaker expects yes). Hindi-Urdu/Italian: rising declaratives can be neutral. This follows from whether clause-typing is forced at C (CP-typed) or routed through PerspP. (Italian neutralOk := true is contested in the rising-declarative literature, e.g. Gunlogson 2003 vs Bartels 1999; Dayal 2025 makes the specific claim — UNVERIFIED page numbers.)

                    • language : String
                    • neutralOk : Bool

                      Can a rising declarative be a neutral (unbiased) question?

                    • obligatorilyBiased : Bool

                      Is a rising declarative always biased?

                    • clauseTyping : ClauseTypingStrategy
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                Cross-linguistic shiftiness data. Parallels McCloskey's English data. Hindi-Urdu kya: shows the same pattern as English embedded inversion: blocked under bare responsive, licensed under negation/questioning.

                                • language : String
                                • verb : String
                                • sentence : String
                                • negated : Bool
                                • questioned : Bool
                                • quasiSubOk : Bool
                                Instances For
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Hindi-Urdu: "want to know" (rogative) freely takes kya: (Dayal 2025: ex (39a)).

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Hindi-Urdu: "know" (responsive) rejects kya: (Dayal 2025: ex (39b)).

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Hindi-Urdu: "nobody knows" + kya: → OK (negation, Dayal 2025: ex (41a)).

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Hindi-Urdu: "does anyone know" + kya: → OK (questioning, Dayal 2025: ex (41b)).

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Hindi-Urdu shiftiness parallels English: bare responsive blocks quasi-sub, negation and questioning license it.

                                              Newari uses conjunct vs disjunct verb forms sensitive to whether the subject is coindexed with the perspectival center (Seat of Knowledge).

                                              • Declaratives: conjunct = 1st person subject (SoK = speaker)
                                              • Interrogatives: conjunct = 2nd person subject (SoK = addressee) This provides independent evidence for perspective shift in questions (canonical Newari conjunct/disjunct pattern; Zu 2018 reanalyses as perspective shift).
                                              • language : String
                                              • clauseType : String
                                              • conjunctPerson : String
                                              Instances For
                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For
                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For
                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For

                                                      Hindi-Urdu shiftiness follows the same derivation as English: responsive predicates reject quasi-sub in bare form, allow under negation/questioning. The theory predicts ALL cross-linguistic data.

                                                      Q-particle embedding follows from which left-peripheral layer they occupy. CP-layer particles appear in subordination; PerspP and SAP particles do not.