Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Presupposition.Studies.SolstadBott2024

Solstad & Bott (2024): The occasion verb presupposition #

@cite{solstad-bott-2024} @cite{tonhauser-beaver-roberts-simons-2013} @cite{heim-1983} @cite{schlenker-2008} @cite{schlenker-2009}

Formalizes the experimental evidence from S&P 17:11 establishing occasion verbs as a distinct class of presupposition trigger.

The occasion verb presupposition #

Occasion verbs (German: bestrafen "punish", kritisieren "criticise", loben "praise", danken "thank", ...) are interpersonal action verbs whose agent performs an action in response to a prior eventuality involving the object. This prior eventuality — the occasion — is presupposed.

Example: "The judge punished Peter"

Experimental evidence (3 experiments) #

Exp 1 (occasion verbs only, N=71):

Exp 2 (occasion + SE + ES psych verbs, N=60):

Exp 3 (filtering, N=58):

Tonhauser et al. (2013) classification #

Occasion verbs are Class C (SCF=no, OLE=yes), alongside factives (know) and change-of-state verbs (stop). However, they are distinguished by their bidirectional context resolution (both m-anaphoric and m-cataphoric) and symmetric filtering — they constitute "a cage of their own" within the trigger taxonomy.

Filtering direction for presupposition triggers. @cite{solstad-bott-2024} Exp 3 shows occasion verbs allow symmetric filtering, while factives and change-of-state verbs only allow left-to-right filtering.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Context resolution direction for presupposition triggers. Refines @cite{tonhauser-beaver-roberts-simons-2013}'s "m-positive" into finer-grained categories based on where the resolving material can appear.

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Occasion verbs are Class C in the @cite{tonhauser-beaver-roberts-simons-2013} taxonomy: SCF=no (can be informative), OLE=yes (attributed to attitude holder).

          The 16 German occasion verbs tested in @cite{solstad-bott-2024}, derived from Fragment entries with .occasion sense tag.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            16 occasion verbs were tested.

            All entries in the occasion verb list use the .occasion sense tag.

            All entries in the occasion verb list are soft presupposition triggers.

            Exp 1 Block 1 regression estimates (Table 1 of @cite{solstad-bott-2024}). Intercept = occasion verb in neutral context. Other coefficients are treatment contrasts. N=71 participants (16 occasion verbs × 3 context conditions).

            • intercept :

              Intercept: occasion verb, neutral context (0–100 scale)

            • neutral_to_anaphoric :

              Neutral → anaphoric improvement (occasion verbs)

            • neutral_to_cataphoric :

              Neutral → cataphoric improvement (occasion verbs)

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Exp 1, Table 1 fixed effects.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Occasion verbs improve in both anaphoric AND cataphoric contexts. This bidirectional improvement is unique to occasion verbs — pronouns and demonstratives show no cataphoric improvement.

                  The cataphoric improvement is substantial (>10 points on 0–100 scale), not a marginal effect.

                  Exp 1 Block 2: projectivity and at-issueness ratings (0–1 scale). Gradient measures following @cite{tonhauser-beaver-degen-2018}.

                  • projectivity :
                  • atIssueness :
                  • projLow :
                  • projHigh :
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Occasion verb projectivity/at-issueness from Exp 1 Block 2.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Occasion verbs have high projectivity (≥ 0.70).

                        Occasion verb content is not at-issue (at-issueness < 0.50).

                        Exp 2 verb classes correspond to @cite{solstad-bott-2022} verb classes. Occasion verbs = agent-evocator, SE = stimulus-experiencer, ES = experiencer-stimulus.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Exp 2 Block 2: projectivity by verb class. N=60 participants. 16 occasion verbs, 9 SE verbs, 9 ES verbs. The key finding: psych verbs have LOWER projectivity than occasion verbs, and k-means k=3 clustering separates them.

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                Instances For
                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    H6 REJECTED: If the occasion implication were shared by all IC verbs, we would expect SE verbs to pattern with occasion verbs. They do not: occasion verbs (0.69) >> SE verbs (0.54).

                                    H7 CONFIRMED: ES verbs do not cluster with occasion verbs either. Occasion verbs (0.69) >> ES verbs (0.52).

                                    SE and ES psych verbs cluster together rather than with occasion verbs: the gap between occasion and SE (0.15) >> gap between SE and ES (0.02).

                                    Trigger position conditions in Exp 3 (filtering experiment). Items are conjunctions in the antecedent of a conditional.

                                    Instances For
                                      @[implicit_reducible]
                                      Equations
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Trigger class conditions in Exp 3. Separate regression analyses were run for each class.

                                        Instances For
                                          @[implicit_reducible]
                                          Equations
                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            Exp 3 regression results from Table 3 of @cite{solstad-bott-2024}. N=58 (75 recruited, 17 excluded). Fixed-effect estimates from mixed-effects regression; reference level is trigger-first.

                                            • triggerClass : Exp3TriggerClass
                                            • intercept :

                                              Intercept (trigger-first condition, the reference level)

                                            • trigOnly_vs_trigFirst :

                                              Contrast: trigger-only minus trigger-first

                                            • trigLast_vs_trigFirst :

                                              Contrast: trigger-last minus trigger-first (KEY test for symmetry)

                                            • tValue :

                                              t-value for the trigger-last vs trigger-first contrast

                                            Instances For
                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                Analysis B: occasion verb filtering. Trigger-first ≈ trigger-last.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  Analysis C: Mandelkern items (factives/aspectuals). Trigger-first << trigger-last.

                                                  Equations
                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                  Instances For

                                                    SYMMETRIC FILTERING for occasion verbs: trigger-first ≈ trigger-last. The estimate (−1.97) is small and not statistically significant (|t| = 1.05 < 2). Occasion verbs filter equally well regardless of whether the resolver precedes or follows the trigger.

                                                    ASYMMETRIC FILTERING for Mandelkern items (factives/aspectuals): trigger-first << trigger-last. The estimate (−30.16) is large and highly significant (|t| = 16.33 >> 2). These triggers filter much better when the resolver precedes the trigger (left-to-right only).

                                                    The filtering asymmetry distinguishes occasion verbs from factives/ aspectuals — the Mandelkern effect is >10× larger.

                                                    H8 (interaction hypothesis): occasion verbs pattern with factives/ aspectuals for left-to-right filtering (both show the trigger-only vs trigger-last contrast), but differ qualitatively for right-to-left filtering (trigger-first condition). Occasion verbs: trigger-first ≈ trigger-last. Factives/aspectuals: trigger-first >> trigger-last.

                                                    Profile characterizing a presupposition trigger's behavior across the dimensions tested by @cite{solstad-bott-2024}. Uses types from the library's projective content taxonomy and the filtering/polarity types defined in this file.

                                                    Instances For
                                                      def SolstadBott2024.instDecidableEqTriggerProfile.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : TriggerProfile) :
                                                      Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For
                                                        Equations
                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                        Instances For

                                                          Occasion verb trigger profile: Class C, bidirectional resolution, symmetric filtering.

                                                          Equations
                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                          Instances For

                                                            Factive/aspectual trigger profile: Class C, no SCF constraint (neutral ≈ anaphoric in Exp 1 data), left-to-right filtering.

                                                            Equations
                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                            Instances For

                                                              Despite sharing Class C, occasion verbs differ from factives in both context resolution and filtering — the "cage of their own" result.

                                                              The distinguishing features are filtering direction and bidirectionality, not the projective class assignment.

                                                              Model an occasion verb's presupposition as an EventPhase.

                                                              Example: "The judge punished Peter"

                                                              • precondition = Peter did something wrong (the occasion)
                                                              • eventOccurs = the judge's punishing action
                                                              • consequence = Peter is punished

                                                              The precondition (occasion) is what projects.

                                                              Equations
                                                              Instances For

                                                                Occasion presupposition projects through negation. "The judge didn't punish Peter" still presupposes Peter did something wrong.

                                                                Under Heim's asymmetric filtering, the local context at the antecedent of a conditional is just the global context — no material from the consequent is available. So if the occasion verb is in the antecedent, its presupposition PROJECTS (is not filtered).

                                                                "If the judge punishes Peter, he was convicted." At "punishes" (antecedent): local context = global context. Presupposition "Peter did something wrong" is NOT entailed → projects.

                                                                Under symmetric filtering, material from the consequent IS available to resolve presuppositions in the antecedent. We model this by providing the consequent's assertion to the local context at the antecedent position.

                                                                "If the judge punishes Peter, he was convicted." Symmetric local context at "punishes": c + [Peter was convicted]. Presupposition "Peter did something wrong" IS entailed → filtered.

                                                                Equations
                                                                Instances For

                                                                  When the consequent entails the occasion presupposition, symmetric filtering predicts the presupposition is filtered.

                                                                  Occasion verbs correspond to the agent-evocator class from @cite{solstad-bott-2022}. The "occasion" presupposition is the same underspecified eventuality that drives the NP2 IC bias: the evocator's prior behavior triggers the agent's interpersonal response.

                                                                  Despite sharing IC properties with psych verbs, occasion verbs have higher projectivity (Exp 2). The IC bias and the presupposition are distinct phenomena: IC bias tracks which argument is explained in "because" continuations, while the presupposition is a projective content that survives embedding under negation, questions, and modals.

                                                                  Occasion verb projectivity/at-issueness from Exp 1 as a GradientPair, bridging to the @cite{tonhauser-beaver-degen-2018} infrastructure.

                                                                  Equations
                                                                  Instances For

                                                                    Pearson r for the correlation between at-issueness and projectivity, aggregated over trigger types.

                                                                    Exp 1 (8 trigger types including occasion verbs): r = −0.70, t(6) = −2.37, p = .06 (marginally significant)

                                                                    Exp 2 (9 trigger types including occasion + psych verbs): r = −0.90, t(7) = −5.33, p < .01 (significant)

                                                                    These correspond to @cite{tonhauser-beaver-degen-2018}'s positive correlations between not-at-issueness and projectivity (r = .85, .99), since at-issueness = 1 − not-at-issueness flips the sign.

                                                                    Equations
                                                                    Instances For
                                                                      Equations
                                                                      Instances For

                                                                        The GPP anti-correlation strengthens from Exp 1 to Exp 2, with more trigger types included.

                                                                        Occasion verbs satisfy the GPP: high projectivity paired with low at-issueness in both experiments.

                                                                        Psych verbs are mid-range on both dimensions: neither clearly projective nor clearly at-issue, placing them outside the GPP pattern that occasion verbs and other triggers follow.