Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Complementation.Studies.Cristofaro2013

Phenomena.Complementation.Studies.Cristofaro2013 #

@cite{noonan-2007} @cite{dryer-2013-wals}

Cross-linguistic complementation analysis anchored on Sonia Cristofaro's five WALS chapters on complement/subordinate clauses (Ch 124--128):

The 19-language ComplementationProfile sample is the testbed for cross-chapter generalizations.

Cristofaro's central insight #

Complement clauses can be classified along a single binary dimension: balanced (retains main-clause morphology) vs. deranked (uses reduced/non-finite forms). This maps onto Noonan's finer typology: balanced ≈ indicative/subjunctive, deranked ≈ infinitive/nominalized/ participle. Different complement types differ systematically in how likely they are to be deranked: utterance complements resist deranking strongly, purpose clauses favor it.

NOTE: cristofaro-2013 has no entry in references.bib yet; cited via inheritance from Cristofaro's Ch 124--128 contribution to @cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}.

Contents #

Out of scope #

The substrate types (BalancedDeranked, WantCompStrategy, ComplementationProfile, WALS converters) and corpus-only generalizations (utterance-mostly-balanced, purpose-more-deranked-than-utterance) live in Linglib/Typology/Complementation.lean. The 20-language Dryer subordination sample lives in Studies/Dryer2013.lean. Noonan's CTP per-verb data is in Studies/Noonan2007.lean.

English: equi-deletion with 'want'; balanced/deranked across purpose/when/reason; balanced utterance.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    Japanese: desiderative suffix -tai; no independent 'want' CTP.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Turkish: strongly deranked (nominalized) across clause types.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Hindi: not in the F125A sample; otherwise mixed.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Mandarin: isolating; uniformly balanced complements.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Korean: balanced despite being agglutinative SOV.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              German: not in F128A sample; mixed otherwise.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Russian: mixed balanced/deranked across subordinate clause types.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Persian: overt complement subjects with 'want'.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Irish: not in F124A sample; mixed otherwise.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Basque: deranked purpose clauses like Turkish.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Yoruba: uniformly balanced (serial verb language).

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Tagalog: V-initial Austronesian; deranked purpose.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Navajo: only in Ch 124A; overt complement subjects.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Swahili: only in Ch 128A.

                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                Arabic (Gulf): balanced+deranked across purpose/when/reason/utterance.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Finnish: negative auxiliary language; balanced+deranked across types.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Spanish: deranked purpose (para + INF); subjunctive complements.

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      French: deranked purpose (pour + INF); subjunctive complements.

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        The 19-language sample.

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Sample utterance complements lean balanced (consistent with Cristofaro's cross-chapter observation).

                                          Sample purpose clauses show more pure-deranked entries than pure-balanced (matching the WALS-aggregate trend in Typology.Complementation.purpose_more_deranked_than_utterance).

                                          theorem Phenomena.Complementation.Studies.Cristofaro2013.sample_want_mostly_implicit :
                                          have withWant := List.filter (fun (x : Typology.Complementation.ComplementationProfile) => x.wantComp.isSome) allCompProfiles; have implicitSubj := List.filter (fun (x : Typology.Complementation.ComplementationProfile) => x.wantComp == some Typology.Complementation.WantCompStrategy.subjectImplicit) withWant; implicitSubj.length * 2 > withWant.length

                                          The 'want' complement subject is left implicit in the majority of sample languages (Cristofaro Ch 124A's headline pattern in our sample).

                                          Project @cite{noonan-2007}'s 6-way NoonanCompType onto Cristofaro's coarser BalancedDeranked typology. Noonan's reduced types (infinitive/nominalized/participle, captured by NoonanCompType.isReduced) correspond to Cristofaro's .deranked; finite types (indicative/subjunctive) correspond to .balanced. Paratactic falls on the balanced side: paratactic complements use main-clause morphology and behave like balanced finite clauses for Cristofaro's morphological test.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            The two typologies' "reduced" diagnostics agree by construction. NoonanCompType.isReduced t = true iff noonanToCristofaro t = .deranked. Promotes the docstring-only correspondence to a kernel-checked theorem.