Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.CompensatoryLengthening.Studies.Hayes1989

Hayes (1989): Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology #

@cite{hayes-1989}

Bruce Hayes. "Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology." Linguistic Inquiry 20(2): 253–306.

This study file formalizes the empirical core of Hayes 1989: the typology of compensatory lengthening (CL) and its three central arguments for moraic theory over segmental prosodic theories (X theory, CV theory).

Core Claims Formalized #

  1. CL is governed by a prosodic frame provided by moraic structure (not by constraints on association line rearrangements).

  2. Onset Deletion Asymmetry: CL from coda deletion is common (38 rules, 26 languages); CL from onset deletion is unattested. Moraic theory derives this from the universal non-moraicity of onsets.

  3. Weight Prerequisite: CL occurs only in languages with a syllable weight distinction. Moraic theory derives this from language-specific moraic structure: only languages with bimoraic syllables have morae to strand.

  4. Moraic Conservation: CL conserves total mora count. This follows automatically from the representations — no stipulation needed.

Languages Covered #

Latin underlying form *kasnus 'gray': σ₁ = ⟨kas⟩ (C=onset, a=nucleus[1μ], s=coda[1μ with WBP]) σ₂ = ⟨nus⟩

With WBP, the coda ⟨s⟩ bears one mora, making σ₁ heavy.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      σ₁ of *kasnus is heavy (2 morae: nucleus + coda with WBP).

      After ⟨s⟩-deletion from σ₁, one mora is stranded.

      After spreading, the vowel ⟨a⟩ becomes long (2 morae). Result: σ₁ = [kaː] with 2 morae — still heavy.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Moraic conservation: *kasnus σ₁ and ka:nus σ₁ have the same mora count.

        Latin *kosmis → ko:mis 'courteous': same pattern.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Latin *smereo → mereo: ⟨s⟩ deletes word-initially (onset position). Since onset ⟨s⟩ has no mora, no CL occurs.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Middle English ⟨talə⟩ 'tale' (original disyllabic form): σ₁ = ⟨ta⟩ (open, light), σ₂ = ⟨lə⟩ (open, light).

            When word-final schwa deletes, Parasitic Delinking removes σ₂'s structure, stranding a mora. Spreading from the left fills it, lengthening ⟨a⟩.

            Equations
            Instances For

              Input ⟨talə⟩ has 2 total morae (one per syllable).

              After schwa deletion from σ₂, one mora is stranded.

              CL result: ⟨a⟩ becomes long, ⟨l⟩ resyllabifies as coda. Output σ = [taːl] with 2 morae.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Conservation: input total morae = output morae.

                In a language without WBP (e.g., Lardil), syllableToMoraic produces non-moraic codas. Deleting the coda strands zero morae → no CL.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  In a language with WBP (e.g., Latin), syllableToMoraic produces moraic codas. Deleting the coda strands one mora → CL is possible.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    The weight prerequisite: the difference between Latin (CL possible) and Lardil (CL impossible) is exactly the WBP parameter.

                    Estonian Q1/Q2/Q3 (short/long/overlong) syllables demonstrate the three-way weight distinction that moraic theory encodes directly as 1μ/2μ/3μ.

                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Q3 → Q2 grade shift: removing the third mora. The moraic account: Q3 has 3 morae, Q2 has 2. The shift is simply "remove the third mora," which automatically eliminates gemination when the third mora belonged to a geminate consonant.

                        Estonian gemination loss: Q3 ⟨paːt.ti⟩ → Q2 ⟨paː.ti⟩. σ₁ goes from 3μ to 2μ; the geminate loses its second mora.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          The full phonological pipeline for Latin ka:nus after CL: moraic syllabification → weight profile → prosodic word.

                          This demonstrates the chain that moraic theory creates: segments + WBP → MoraicSyllableSyllWeightPrWd

                          CL output: σ₁ = [ka:] (bimoraic = heavy), σ₂ = [nus] (bimoraic = heavy). Weight profile: [H, H].

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            CL output satisfies the bimoraic minimal word constraint (4μ ≥ 2μ).

                            Middle English: CL preserves the bimoraic minimum across syllable restructuring. Input ⟨talə⟩ = [L, L] (2μ); output [ta:l] = [H] (2μ). Both satisfy the bimoraic minimum.

                            This follows from Moraic Conservation (Rule (64), @cite{hayes-1989}): CL does not change total mora count, so it cannot cause a minimal word violation that wasn't already present.