Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Mayan.Kiche.Agreement

K'iche' Agreement Fragment @cite{mondloch-2017} #

Theory-neutral typological metadata for K'iche' (K'ichean Mayan) agreement morphology, following @cite{mondloch-2017} Lessons 4, 7–8, 9, 15. K'iche' is uniformly ergative-absolutive (Set B = ABS, Set A = ERG); unlike its sister Kaqchikel it has no construction-specific inverted alignment.

The System #

K'iche' has an ergative-absolutive alignment system realized through two agreement paradigms on the verb:

Paradigms #

Set B (Absolutive) — Lesson 9 #

PersonSingularPlural
1in-oj-
2at-ix-
3Ø-ee-
2.FORMla (postverbal)alaq (postverbal)

Set A (Ergative, preconsonantal) — Lessons 7, 15 #

PersonSingularPlural
1nu‑ / in‑qa-
2a-i-
3u-ki-
2.FORMla (postverbal)alaq (postverbal)

Set A (Ergative, prevocalic) — Lesson 8 #

PersonSingularPlural
1w-q-
2aw-iw-
3r-k-
2.FORMla (postverbal)alaq (postverbal)

Alignment #

The alignment is ergative-absolutive: Set B groups S and P together (both trigger the same paradigm), while A triggers a distinct paradigm (Set A). This contrasts with Mam, which shows morphologically tripartite alignment (S, A, and P each trigger distinct patterns; @cite{scott-2023}).

Formal address #

K'iche' has two levels of formality for 2nd person: informal and formal. The formal forms (laal SG, alaq PL) are syntactically postverbal and do not participate in the prefix paradigm.

Formality level for 2nd person. K'iche'-specific: the formal forms (laal SG, alaq PL) are postverbal and pattern outside the prefix paradigm.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A person/number/formality specification. Uses canonical Features.Prominence.PersonLevel for cross-language compatibility; Formality is K'iche'-specific.

      Instances For
        def Fragments.Mayan.Kiche.instDecidableEqPhiFeatures.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : PhiFeatures) :
        Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            @[reducible, inline]

            Shorthand for informal phi features.

            Equations
            Instances For

              Set B (absolutive) agreement markers. These are verbal prefixes (or postverbal particles for formal forms) that cross-reference S (intransitive subject) and P (transitive object). @cite{mondloch-2017} Lessons 9, 15.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Set A (ergative) markers before consonant-initial roots. These cross-reference A (transitive subject) and are identical to possessive pronouns before consonant-initial nouns. @cite{mondloch-2017} Lessons 7, 15.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Set A (ergative) markers before vowel-initial roots. @cite{mondloch-2017} Lesson 8.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Is a Set B marker a prefix (appearing before the root) or a postverbal particle? Formal forms are postverbal; all others are prefixes. @cite{mondloch-2017} Lesson 9.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Is a Set A marker a prefix or postverbal? Same distribution as Set B: formal forms are postverbal.

                      Equations
                      Instances For
                        @[reducible, inline]

                        Argument positions in a K'iche' clause. Aliased to the canonical Features.Prominence.ArgumentRole (S/A/P/R/T) so cross-Mayan and cross-framework code shares one inventory. Use the canonical constructor names .A / .P / .S directly.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Which agreement set cross-references each argument position?

                          Instances For
                            @[implicit_reducible]
                            Equations
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              @[reducible, inline]

                              The case associated with each argument position. Definitionally equal to Fragments.Mayan.ergCaseKiche, which derives from Alignment.ergative.assignCase in Theories/Syntax/Case/Alignment.lean.

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                K'iche' alignment contrast with Mam: K'iche' is ergative-absolutive (S = P ≠ A), while Mam is tripartite (S ≠ A ≠ P, all three receive distinct cases). In K'iche', both P and S trigger Set B; in Mam, P triggers no agreement at all.

                                2SG.FORM: la (postverbal)

                                2PL.FORM: alaq (postverbal)

                                Set A markers are identical to possessive pronouns: the transitive subject markers (Lesson 15) are the same forms as the possessive prefixes (Lessons 7–8). This is a hallmark of ergative-absolutive languages, where ERG agreement and possession share the same morphological paradigm. @cite{mondloch-2017} Lesson 15 explicitly notes this identity.

                                Formal Set B markers are NOT prefixes (they're postverbal).

                                Independent (free) personal pronouns. These are used in nonverbal sentences and as emphatic/contrastive pronouns in verbal sentences. @cite{mondloch-2017} Lesson 4.

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Independent pronouns correspond to Set B (absolutive) markers in form: 1SG in = Set B in-, 2SG at = Set B at-, etc. This is expected for an ergative language where the independent pronouns pattern with absolutive agreement.

                                  K'iche' is HIGH-ABS: Set B markers appear pre-stem on Infl.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    Set B linearity: prefixal (HIGH-ABS K'ichean morphology).

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      3rd person absolutive is null — invariant across the standard Mayan branches per @cite{kaufman-norman-1984} Table 8. Not pan-Mayan: see Mam exception via MayanLang.isStandard.

                                      K'iche''s extraction profile: Agent-Focus Antipassive is productive (@cite{mondloch-2017} Lesson 22, with parallel coverage at Lessons 30 + 33 for radical TV and perfect aspect). The voice marker is -n (shared morphologically with the Absolutive Antipassive of Lesson 21; the AF vs absolutive-antipassive alternation is syntactic — both arguments overt for AF, object suppressed for absolutive antipassive — not morphological). HIGH-ABS K'ichean, structurally analogous to Kaqchikel.

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For