Dargwa (Tanti) Coordination @cite{sumbatova-2021} #
Clause coordination is not typical of Dargwa — subordination via non-finite verb forms is the primary strategy for combining clauses (@cite{sumbatova-2021} §4.8.1). When coordination does occur, it uses the following strategies:
NP Coordination #
=ra (ADD): enclitic additive particle, repeated after each conjunct. Also used as a sentence-level additive ('also, too'). "c'al malla=ra ca qulki=ra" = 'two mullahs and a thief'.
ja ... ja (DISJ ... DISJ): repeated disjunction. "ja ... ja" = 'neither ... nor' (with negation).
=nu: contrastive/causal particle.
These patterns connect to the M&S (Mitrovic & Sauerland) typology
formalized in Phenomena.Coordination.Studies.Haspelmath2007.
Connection to Typology #
Dargwa's =ra is a MU particle (repeated on each conjunct, also additive), making Dargwa a MU-only conjunction language. The absence of a J-only strategy (no free "and" between conjuncts) is predicted by M&S: languages can have MU without J.
=ra — additive/conjunction particle. Bound enclitic, postpositive. Repeated after each conjunct: "A=ra B=ra" = 'A and B'. Also sentence-level additive: "nuka=ra" = 'we too'. This is a MU particle.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
ja...ja — disjunction. Free, repeated before each disjunct. "ja A ja B" = 'either A or B'. With negation: 'neither A nor B'.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
=nu — contrastive/causal particle. Marks contrast between clauses or causal relation.
Equations
- Fragments.Dargwa.Coordination.nu = { form := "=nu", gloss := "but; because", role := Features.Coordination.CoordRole.advers, boundness := Features.Coordination.Boundness.bound }
Instances For
Dargwa has no J-only conjunction particle. Its conjunction strategy is MU-only (=ra repeated on each conjunct).
The MU particle =ra is also an additive particle, as predicted by M&S typology.
The MU particle is bound (enclitic).