Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Burmese.Negation

Burmese Negation Fragment #

@cite{miestamo-2005} @cite{haspelmath-2013} @cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}

Burmese expresses standard negation with a circumfix: prefix ma- on the verb and suffix -bu replacing the TAM markers of the affirmative.

Always asymmetric (A/Cat) #

Burmese negation is always asymmetric: the negative suffix -bu replaces the TAM (tense-aspect-mood) markers used in the affirmative, neutralizing TAM distinctions. This is paradigmatic asymmetry: the negative paradigm has fewer formal distinctions than the affirmative.

Paradigm (sa 'eat') #

ConstructionAffirmativeNegative
Realissa-dehma-sa-bu
Irrealissa-mehma-sa-bu
Futuresa-laimehma-sa-bu

The affirmative distinguishes realis (-deh), irrealis (-meh), and future (-laimeh), but the negative collapses all three to ma-...-bu.

The Burmese negative prefix. Component of the bipartite ma-...-bu circumfix; see circumfix for the substrate-typed entry.

Equations
Instances For

    The Burmese negative suffix (replaces TAM markers). Component of the bipartite ma-...-bu circumfix.

    Equations
    Instances For

      ma-...-bu — Burmese's bipartite negation circumfix. The prefix attaches to the verb stem; the suffix replaces the affirmative TAM markers (realis -deh, irrealis -meh, future -laimeh), neutralizing TAM distinctions. WALS classifies Burmese as .doubleNegation (Ch 112A).

      Equations
      Instances For

        A Burmese negation paradigm entry showing TAM neutralization.

        • tamLabel : String
        • affirmative : String
        • negative : String
        • glossAff : String
        • glossNeg : String
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            Equations
            Instances For

              Paradigm for sa 'eat'.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Which TAM categories are available in affirmative vs negative.

                • affirmativeTAM : List String

                  TAM distinctions available in affirmative

                • negativeTAM : List String

                  TAM distinctions available in negative

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Verification #

                        theorem Fragments.Burmese.Negation.tam_neutralized :
                        have negForms := List.map (fun (x : NegParadigmEntry) => x.negative) saParadigm; (negForms.all fun (x : String) => x == "ma-sa-bu") = true

                        All negative forms are identical: TAM is neutralized.

                        The affirmative has 3 distinct TAM forms; the negative has 1.

                        theorem Fragments.Burmese.Negation.affirmative_forms_distinct :
                        have affForms := List.map (fun (x : NegParadigmEntry) => x.affirmative) saParadigm; affForms.length = 3 affForms.eraseDups.length = 3

                        All affirmative forms are distinct (3 TAM contrasts).

                        Burmese negation profile (WALS Ch 112-115 + Greco/JinKoenig fields).

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For