Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Adyghe.Clause

Adyghe Clausal Embedding Inventory #

[CP11a]

Adyghe (Northwest Caucasian, ISO 639-3 ady) inventory of complement-taking predicates. [CP11a]'s central descriptive result: Adyghe has no embedded declaratives or embedded polar interrogatives — every tensed notional complement is a relative construction inside a DP ((96) vs (98)), while a smaller class of volitional and aspectual predicates takes infinitival/converbal TPs (their §8). The construction imposes no presuppositional restriction (their §6.5) — pace the relative fact-clause characterization they cite from Gerasimov & Lander.

Factivity values are textbook consensus for the predicate concepts — [CP11a] run no per-predicate projection tests; their only factivity-relevant claim is the construction-level one above. Forms follow the paper's transliteration (ʷ marks labialization, ʼ ejectives, ə schwa).

Predicate schema #

Status of the high applicative re- on a predicate's notional-complement verb ([CP11a] §6.3): re- is the only applicative confined to relative constructions, occurs outermost in the applicative field, and — always adjacent to the relativizer ze- — distinguishes proposition-denoting embeddings from ordinary relatives.

  • required : HighApplicative

    Every attested notional complement carries ze-re-.

  • readingConditioned : HighApplicative

    Attested with and without re-, tracking the polar-question vs constituent-question reading ((99) vs (69)), not free variation.

  • notApplicable : HighApplicative

    The predicate takes an infinitival/converbal TP, not a relative clause — the volitional/aspectual class of their §8.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Case suffix on the complement DP's right edge: absolutive -r vs oblique -m, "which depends on the different case assigning properties of the respective main predicate" ((98) vs (99)). Caveat ([CP11a] §2.2.3): Adyghe has an extensive middle class taking absolutive subject + oblique object, so this split may reduce to matrix valence.

      Instances For
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          An Adyghe complement-taking predicate.

          Instances For
            def Adyghe.Clause.instDecidableEqAdygheEmbedder.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : AdygheEmbedder) :
            Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Relative-strategy predicates #

                Tensed notional complements: a DP-wrapped relative clause whose verb carries ze-re-.

                gʷəpšəsa 'think'. The bare finite complement is ungrammatical ((96)); the relative-construction complement is fine ((98)); plain DP objects attested ((102)). [CP11a] §6.2.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  qəč'ewəpč'a 'ask'. Constituent-question complements carry the relativizer without re- ((69)); polar complements carry ze-re- ((99)); direct embedding of a matrix interrogative is out ((97)). Plain DP objects attested ((103)). [CP11a] §§5, 6.2.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    ŝe (also jeŝe) 'know'. One ze-re- complement is ambiguous between declarative and interrogative readings ((101)); the complement is a strong island ((104)–(106)). [CP11a] §6.2.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      gʷərəʔʷe 'understand'. Its ze-re- complement is truth-conditionally equivalent with and without an overt nominal head — qeba 'news', ŝəpqə 'verity' ((108)–(110)) — the paper's argument for a silent N in the shell. [CP11a] §6.3.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        ʔʷa 'say', with a ze-re- complement in §3.1's footnote example (ii). [CP11a].

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Infinitival-strategy predicates #

                          The volitional and aspectual class takes infinitival/converbal TPs, not relative clauses ([CP11a] §8, citing Polinsky & Potsdam).

                          raʔežʼa 'begin' — aspectual, infinitival TP complement (-new infinitive, (54); the star on (54) targets the possessive marker, not the complement). [CP11a] §2.3, §8.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Inventories #

                            The predicates whose tensed complements use the relative strategy.

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              Drift sentry: the relative-strategy predicates are exactly the five tensed-complement-takers.

                              theorem Adyghe.Clause.relative_strategy_factivity_blind :
                              ( (v : AdygheEmbedder), v relativeTakers v.factive = some true) (v : AdygheEmbedder), v relativeTakers v.factive = some false

                              The relative strategy is factivity-blind: it is required both for consensus-factive 'know'/'understand' and consensus-non-factive 'think'/'say' ([CP11a] §6.5: the construction has no presuppositional restriction).