Documentation

Linglib.Features.Person.Decomposition

Person #

[HR02] [AH08] [AN18] [Har16a] [Cys09] [Sie04]

Two components of the person API:

§ 1–4: Person Features ([HR02]'s dependency organization, in the bivalent presentation surveyed by [AH08]; with [AN18]'s function-valued alternative). The typological category inventory (§5+) is [Cys09]'s, derived from these features — not their source. Decomposition of person into two bivalent features:

These features form a containment hierarchy: [+author] → [+participant]. An author (speaker) is necessarily a participant. The hierarchy is carried as the cooccurrence filter inherited from Features.ContainmentPair — the descriptive convention of the feature-geometric tradition. [Har16a] ch. 9 rejects the filter: in his calculus +author(−participant(π)) is the quadripartition exclusive, not ill-formed — see Features/ContainmentPair.lean and Studies/Harbour2016.lean.

This decomposition is shared across theoretical frameworks:

The Minimalist-specific extension [±proximate] ([PZ18]) is added in Syntax/Minimalist/Phi/Geometry.lean.

The canonical analytical inventory (root Person) lives in Features/Person/Basic.lean; this file is its feature decomposition and referential-category layer.

§ 5–9: Person Categories ([Cys09]). The 8 referential person categories from Cysouw's paradigmatic framework. Three singular categories (individual speech act roles) and five group categories (attested combinations of participants).

The full paradigmatic structure machinery (morpheme classes, homophony types, language data) lives in Studies/Cysouw2009.lean.

Bivalent person features: [±participant, ±author].

These two features suffice for the three-way person distinction:

  • 1st person: [+participant, +author]
  • 2nd person: [+participant, −author]
  • 3rd person: [−participant, −author]

The fourth combination [−participant, +author] is cut by the containment filter (WellFormed): an author (speaker) is necessarily a speech-act participant.

  • hasParticipant : Bool

    [+participant]: referent includes a speech-act participant (1P or 2P).

  • hasAuthor : Bool

    [+author]: referent includes the speaker (1P only for singulars).

Instances For
    def Person.instDecidableEqFeatures.decEq (x✝ x✝¹ : Features) :
    Decidable (x✝ = x✝¹)
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      def Person.instReprFeatures.repr :
      FeaturesStd.Format
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations

        1st person features: [+participant, +author].

        Equations
        Instances For

          2nd person features: [+participant, −author].

          Equations
          Instances For

            3rd person features: [−participant, −author].

            Equations
            Instances For

              Decompose a person value into the binary features. The quadripartition cells share firstF (the two-feature system underdetermines clusivity — see Category.toFeatures); the impersonal zero has no featural decomposition.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The [±participant, ±author] decomposition is carrier-equivalent to the containment pair: outer = participant, inner = author. One edge of the φ-feature iso-web (phiKernelEquiv, Studies/Harbour2016.lean).

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  @[simp]

                  The three canonical person values land on the three well-formed cells.

                  @[reducible, inline]

                  Well-formedness: [+author] → [+participant] — an author is necessarily a participant. The geometry-tradition containment filter, inherited from ContainmentPair.WellFormed through the presentation.

                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    theorem Person.illFormed_only :
                    ¬{ hasParticipant := false, hasAuthor := true }.WellFormed

                    The filtered combination [−participant, +author] is the only one that violates containment.

                    theorem Person.card_wellFormed :
                    Fintype.card { pf : Features // pf.WellFormed } = 3

                    Exactly 3 well-formed feature combinations (= 3 persons) — the carrier count of the containment chain (ContainmentPair.card_wellFormed).

                    theorem Person.toFeatures_wellFormed (p : Person) (f : Features) :
                    p.toFeatures = some ff.WellFormed

                    Every defined decomposition is well-formed.

                    theorem Person.isSAP_iff_participant (p : Person) (f : Features) :
                    p.toFeatures = some f(p.IsSAP f.hasParticipant = true)

                    IsSAP is featural participanthood.

                    theorem Person.no_fourth_person (a b c d : Features) :
                    a.WellFormedb.WellFormedc.WellFormedd.WellFormeda ba ca db cb dc dFalse

                    No 4-way singular person distinction (inherited from ContainmentPairLike.no_four_way).

                    The 8 referential person categories ([Cys09] ch. 3: the three singular participants plus the five attested of the seven logical groups of Table 3.1 — 1+1 (mass speaking) and 2+2 (present-audience-only) are dismissed as not grammaticalized, his §3.4).

                    Instances For
                      @[implicit_reducible]
                      Equations
                      @[implicit_reducible]
                      Equations
                      def Person.instReprCategory.repr :
                      CategoryStd.Format
                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        All 8 categories in canonical order (singular, then group).

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Is this a singular (individual) category?

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Is this a group (non-singular) category?

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              Is this part of the first person complex (contains speaker as part of a group)?

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Is this an inclusive category (contains both speaker and addressee)?

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Does this category include the speaker?

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    Does this category include the addressee?

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      UD conflates inclusive and exclusive under first person plural.

                                      The [Cys09] category a (person, number) coordinate pair realizes, over the canonical inventories. Clusivity rides on the person value; the minimal/augmented coordinates give the minimal/augmented inclusives directly (Tagalog kata = (firstInclusive, minimal)minIncl, the junction coordinates of Studies/Cysouw2009.lean); the Maori-type dual alignment maps there too; plain first non-singulars are a syncretism (none).

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        The person coordinate of each referential category — the projection the canonical inventory recovers losslessly where UD cannot: minIncl/augInclfirstInclusive, exclfirstExclusive. (The number coordinate is toUDPersonNumber's second component; the full Category ≃ compatible (Person × Number) junction is the planned phase-2 theorem.)

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          The person projection tracks speaker inclusion.

                                          Unlike UD realization, the person projection separates inclusive from exclusive.

                                          ofPersonNumber inverts the person projection: every category is recovered from its coordinates at some number value.

                                          Decompose any Category into binary person features (the framework-neutral Cysouw/Siewierska [±participant, ±author] decomposition).

                                          • hasAuthor = includesSpeaker: the referent contains the speaker.
                                          • hasParticipant = includesSpeaker ∨ includesAddressee: the referent contains at least one speech-act participant.

                                          Features underdetermine group categories: excl, minIncl, and augIncl all map to ⟨true, true⟩ — a genuine property of the descriptive two-feature system (the Category enum carries the clusivity distinction the features cannot). The theory-laden Harbour-sign decomposition that does distinguish the exclusive (+author −participant) lives in the theory layer (as Studies.Harbour2016.signOf, over Syntax.Minimalist.Phi.Lattice operators), not here.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            All 8 categories yield well-formed features.

                                            Round-trip: singular categories are recovered from their person projection.

                                            includesSpeaker on Category = hasParticipant ∧ hasAuthor on Person for singular categories: speaker (s1) = [+participant, +author], addressee (s2) = [+participant, −author], other (s3) = [−participant, −author]. This unifies the Category decomposition in Spanish/PersonFeatures.lean with Phi.Geometry.decomposePerson.

                                            Singular categories: Category.toFeatures agrees with the person decomposition through the person projection.

                                            Epistemic authority marking on verb agreement. [BN07]

                                            Some languages (Akhvakh, Kathmandu Newari, Tibetan) mark whether the speaker has direct epistemic authority over the event. The morphological distinction cross-cuts person but correlates with it:

                                            • conjunct: speaker has authority (1st person declarative, 2nd person interrogative)
                                            • disjunct: speaker lacks authority (2nd/3rd declarative, 1st/3rd interrogative)
                                            Instances For
                                              @[implicit_reducible]
                                              Equations
                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For