Rising and falling declaratives #
[Gun01] represents a two-party context as the pair of the participants' commitment
sets, the worlds compatible with each one's public beliefs (60), and reads a declarative's
intonation as choosing whose commitment set its content updates: falling for the speaker's,
rising for the addressee's (77), (78). Which participant is committed to what defines the
statuses of a proposition — a commitment of a participant, a joint commitment, resolved,
controversial — and the bias of a context toward it (63)–(68). [Gun08] refines the
addressee's commitment under a rising declarative as attributed by the speaker rather than
self-generated, the Commitment.Source coordinate.
Main definitions #
Commitment.commitmentSet—cs_X(60).Commitment.falling,Commitment.rising— (78), (77).Commitment.IsCommitmentOf,IsJoint,IsResolved,IsControversial,IsBiased,IsNeutral— (63)–(68).
Main results #
Commitment.commitmentSet_falling,Commitment.commitmentSet_rising— each intonation narrows exactly one commitment set.Commitment.isBiased_falling,Commitment.isBiased_rising— a declarative in a neutral, unresolved context biases it toward its content.Commitment.IsResolved.isNeutral— a resolved context is neutral under (68), since (66) makes a resolved proposition controversial for no one.
References #
cs_X (60): the worlds compatible with x's public commitments.
Equations
Instances For
A falling declarative (78): the speaker commits to p.
Equations
- Commitment.falling K p = insert (Commitment.commit Discourse.Role.speaker p) K
Instances For
A rising declarative (77): the addressee is committed to p, attributed by the speaker.
Equations
Instances For
(63): p is a commitment of x.
Equations
- Commitment.IsCommitmentOf K x p = ((Commitment.commitmentSet K x).Nonempty ∧ Commitment.commitmentSet K x ⊆ p)
Instances For
(64): p is a joint commitment.
Equations
- Commitment.IsJoint K p = ∀ (x : Discourse.Role), Commitment.IsCommitmentOf K x p
Instances For
(65): p is resolved.
Equations
- Commitment.IsResolved K p = (Commitment.IsJoint K p ∨ Commitment.IsJoint K pᶜ)
Instances For
(66): p is controversial — someone is committed against it, it is unresolved, and no
commitment set is empty.
Equations
- Commitment.IsControversial K p = ((∃ (x : Discourse.Role), Commitment.IsCommitmentOf K x pᶜ) ∧ ¬Commitment.IsResolved K p ∧ ∀ (x : Discourse.Role), (Commitment.commitmentSet K x).Nonempty)
Instances For
(67): the context is biased toward p.
Equations
- Commitment.IsBiased K p = (Commitment.IsControversial K pᶜ ∧ ¬Commitment.IsControversial K p)
Instances For
(68): the context is neutral with respect to p.
Equations
- Commitment.IsNeutral K p = (¬Commitment.IsControversial K p ∧ ¬Commitment.IsControversial K pᶜ)
Instances For
A falling declarative narrows the speaker's commitment set by its content and leaves the addressee's alone.
A rising declarative narrows the addressee's commitment set by its content and leaves the speaker's alone.
Statuses #
A resolved proposition is controversial for no one, so a resolved context is neutral.
In a neutral, unresolved, nonempty context no participant is committed either way.
Narrowing one participant's commitment set to p in a neutral, unresolved, nonempty context
biases it toward p.
A falling declarative in a neutral, unresolved, nonempty context biases it toward its content.
A rising declarative in a neutral, unresolved, nonempty context biases it toward its content.