Documentation

Linglib.Discourse.Accessibility

Accessibility — Ariel's referential-form scale #

AccessibilityLevel: the 18-tier Accessibility Marking Scale of [Ari90], reproduced in [Ari01]'s overview (least accessible fullNameMod to most accessible zero), with rank (and the LinearOrder it induces), the three form-function criteria (informativity, rigidity, attenuation), the coarsening toDefinitenessLevel to Prominence.DefinitenessLevel, and the form-correlate bridge GivennessStatus.toAccessibility.

Accessibility and definiteness are non-monotonically related (full names are less accessible than definite descriptions, yet first/last names are more accessible; names are also more prominent for DOM), so they are separate types and toDefinitenessLevel is many-to-one and non-monotone.

Sibling of Features/Givenness.lean (GHZ-6): this classifies forms, GivennessStatus classifies entities. Also here: NextMentionBias.

Accessibility marking scale #

The Accessibility Marking Scale of [Ari90], as printed in [Ari01]: classes of referring expressions ordered from least to most accessible. Speakers use more reduced forms for more accessible referents.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[instance_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

      Form-function criteria #

      Definiteness coarsening #

      Coarsening: each accessibility level maps to one of the 5 DefinitenessLevel categories used for differential argument marking. This is a many-to-one, non-monotone mapping — names are less accessible than definite descriptions but more prominent for DOM.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Next-mention bias #

        Next-mention bias: how likely a discourse referent is to be mentioned again in the subsequent utterance. Driven by thematic roles, coherence relations, and discourse structure.

        Instances For
          @[instance_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Prototype form choice for a next-mention bias: high bias → unstressed pronoun; low bias → full name.

            This encodes the expectancy hypothesis — next-mention predictability drives form reduction — which [RA17] defends and [KR13] rejects (production there tracks topichood, with next-mention probability affecting interpretation only).

            Equations
            Instances For

              Givenness projection #

              Prototypical accessibility level for each givenness status. The four definite rows are [GHZ93]'s own form correlates (unstressed pronoun, bare demonstrative, demonstrative NP, definite description); the two indefinite statuses (referential = "indefinite this N", typeIdentifiable = "a N") have no form on the accessibility scale, so their rows are editorial rank-alignment, not form identity. [Ari01] criticizes the givenness hierarchy (no evidence for scalar distinctions below its top statuses) rather than endorsing such a projection.

              Equations
              Instances For