Validity patterns for comparative probability #
The intuitively valid (V1–V13) and invalid (I1–I3) inference patterns for
comparative epistemic modals ([HI13], Figure 1; [Yal10]),
stated for an abstract likelihood relation r on a Boolean algebra and proved
once at the weakest axiom hypotheses. Models whose relations carry the
ComparativeProbability.* mixins unconditionally (e.g. FinAddMeasure.inducedGe)
discharge each pattern by instance resolution. The world-ordering lifts
(Scales/EpistemicScale/Entailments.lean) instead validate most patterns for
arbitrary world relations — strictly weaker hypotheses than the mixin route,
which would demand reflexivity, transitivity, and (for the m-lift) finiteness —
so their V2–V7 proofs are deliberately bespoke; they consume this layer
exactly where its hypotheses are genuinely required (V11/V12).
I1–I3 are stated but not proved here: they are invalid for additive models
(refuted by measure counterexamples) yet valid for the l-lifting, so their status
is model-specific.
Main statements #
patternV1_holds—V1holds for every relation (pure logic).patternV2,patternV3,patternV4,patternV5,patternV7— from monotonicity (+ transitivity).patternV6— additionally needs additivity and non-triviality.patternV11,patternV12— from transitivity + complement reversal.patternV13— from monotonicity + additivity.
V1: △a → ¬△aᶜ.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV1 r = ∀ (a : α), ComparativeProbability.Probably r a → ¬ComparativeProbability.Probably r aᶜ
Instances For
V2: △(a ⊓ b) → △a ∧ △b.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV2 r = ∀ (a b : α), ComparativeProbability.Probably r (a ⊓ b) → ComparativeProbability.Probably r a ∧ ComparativeProbability.Probably r b
Instances For
V3: △a → △(a ⊔ b).
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV3 r = ∀ (a b : α), ComparativeProbability.Probably r a → ComparativeProbability.Probably r (a ⊔ b)
Instances For
V6: □a → △a, where □a is ⊥ ≽ aᶜ.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV6 r = ∀ (a : α), r ⊥ aᶜ → ComparativeProbability.Probably r a
Instances For
V7: △a → ◇a.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV7 r = ∀ (a : α), ComparativeProbability.Probably r a → ComparativeProbability.Possibly r a
Instances For
V11: b ≽ a → △a → △b.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV11 r = ∀ (a b : α), r b a → ComparativeProbability.Probably r a → ComparativeProbability.Probably r b
Instances For
V12: b ≽ a → a ≽ aᶜ → b ≽ bᶜ.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV12 r = ∀ (a b : α), r b a → r a aᶜ → r b bᶜ
Instances For
V13: (a \ b) ≻ ⊥ → (a ⊔ b) ≻ b.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternV13 r = ∀ (a b : α), ComparativeProbability.Strict r (a \ b) ⊥ → ComparativeProbability.Strict r (a ⊔ b) b
Instances For
I1: a ≽ b → a ≽ c → a ≽ (b ⊔ c).
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternI1 r = ∀ (a b c : α), r a b → r a c → r a (b ⊔ c)
Instances For
I2: a ≽ aᶜ → a ≽ b.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternI2 r = ∀ (a b : α), r a aᶜ → r a b
Instances For
I3: △a → a ≽ b.
Equations
- ComparativeProbability.patternI3 r = ∀ (a b : α), ComparativeProbability.Probably r a → r a b
Instances For
V1 holds for any relation: it is pure logic about Strict and double
complement, requiring no axioms.
V2 from monotonicity and transitivity.
V3 from monotonicity and transitivity.
V4 from monotonicity.
V5 from monotonicity.
V6 from monotonicity, transitivity, additivity, and non-triviality.
V7 from monotonicity and transitivity.
V11 from transitivity and complement reversal.
V12 from transitivity and complement reversal.
V13 from monotonicity and additivity.