Documentation

Linglib.Core.Logic.Intensional.ConversationalBackground

Conversational Backgrounds #

@cite{kratzer-1981} @cite{kratzer-2012}

A conversational background maps worlds to sets of propositions. Two roles:

Despite being introduced by Kratzer for natural-language modality, these are generic IL primitives — no Kratzer-specific commitments live here. The Kratzer-flavored modality theory in Theories/Semantics/Modality/Kratzer/ re-exports these so that consumers can keep using either namespace.

@[reducible, inline]

A conversational background maps worlds to sets of propositions.

Kratzer's key innovation: the modal base and ordering source are both conversational backgrounds, but play different roles.

Equations
Instances For
    @[reducible, inline]

    The modal base: determines which worlds are accessible.

    Equations
    Instances For
      @[reducible, inline]

      The ordering source: determines how accessible worlds are ranked.

      Equations
      Instances For

        A conversational background is realistic iff for all w: w ∈ ⋂f(w). The actual world satisfies all propositions in the background.

        @cite{kratzer-1981}: realistic conversational backgrounds make every fact about w part of ⋂f(w). UNVERIFIED page reference.

        Equations
        Instances For

          A conversational background is totally realistic iff for all w: ⋂f(w) = {w}. The strongest form: only the actual world is accessible. UNVERIFIED page reference.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The empty conversational background: f(w) = ∅ for all w. ⋂f(w) = W (vacuous intersection), so the empty background is itself trivially realistic. UNVERIFIED page reference.

            Equations
            Instances For