Conversational Backgrounds #
@cite{kratzer-1981} @cite{kratzer-2012}
A conversational background maps worlds to sets of propositions. Two roles:
- Modal base (
ModalBase) determines accessibility —R_f(w, w') ≡ w' ∈ ⋂f(w). - Ordering source (
OrderingSource) ranks accessible worlds by how many ordering propositions they satisfy.
Despite being introduced by Kratzer for natural-language modality, these are
generic IL primitives — no Kratzer-specific commitments live here. The
Kratzer-flavored modality theory in Theories/Semantics/Modality/Kratzer/
re-exports these so that consumers can keep using either namespace.
A conversational background maps worlds to sets of propositions.
Kratzer's key innovation: the modal base and ordering source are both conversational backgrounds, but play different roles.
Equations
- Core.Logic.Intensional.ConvBackground W = (W → List (W → Prop))
Instances For
The modal base: determines which worlds are accessible.
Instances For
The ordering source: determines how accessible worlds are ranked.
Instances For
A conversational background is realistic iff for all w: w ∈ ⋂f(w). The actual world satisfies all propositions in the background.
@cite{kratzer-1981}: realistic conversational backgrounds make every fact
about w part of ⋂f(w). UNVERIFIED page reference.
Equations
- Core.Logic.Intensional.isRealistic f = ∀ (w : W), ∀ p ∈ f w, p w
Instances For
A conversational background is totally realistic iff for all w:
⋂f(w) = {w}. The strongest form: only the actual world is accessible.
UNVERIFIED page reference.
Equations
- Core.Logic.Intensional.isTotallyRealistic f = ∀ (w : W), Core.Logic.Intensional.Premise.propIntersection (f w) = {w}
Instances For
The empty conversational background: f(w) = ∅ for all w.
⋂f(w) = W (vacuous intersection), so the empty background is itself
trivially realistic. UNVERIFIED page reference.