Docs / Studies / Studies.Bloomfield1933

Language

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Henry Holt and Company

Bloomfield defines a word as a minimum free form, a free form that does not consist of lesser free forms, and sorts words by the free forms they contain: man and re-ceive are primary, boy-ish and door-knob secondary. By the definition poor John is a phrase, and so is the compound door-knob, which Bloomfield tells from a phrase by its single high stress. A suppletive alternant bears no resemblance to the other alternants of its form, and Bloomfield finds them for underlying forms, bet- of good and went of go, and for bound forms, the plural -en of ox-en: the roots good and go vary while kind and ox do not, and the plural varies while the comparative does not.

Implementation notes

The words of the suppletion examples are spelled out by Vocabulary Insertion, a root and the head of its secondary derivation each by its own items, into an inflectional paradigm of stems and inflectional material (Morphology.InflectionalParadigm). Suppletion of an underlying form is variance of a lexeme's stems across its cells, and suppletion of a bound form variance of a cell's inflectional material across lexemes. An exponent is a list of morphs, the zero alternant the empty one.

TODO

Bloomfield tells phonetic modification, as in child : children and feel : felt, from suppletion by whether the language shows parallel modifications; a Vocabulary Item for each modified form would count it as suppletive.

References

Words and phrases

Suppletion

good and go have the suppletive alternants bet- and went of the underlying form, while kind and ox keep theirs, and the plural has the suppletive alternant -en after ox, while the comparative keeps -er (§13.7).

theorem suppletionL217–225

Built from