Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.Minimalist.SmallClause

Small Clause Predication #

@cite{dendikken-1995} @cite{baker-1988}

@cite{dendikken-1995}'s central thesis: all subject-predicate relationships are incarnated as small clauses [SC Subject Predicate]. The predicate head's category determines the construction type:

Pred categoryConstructionExample
PVerb-particle / dative"lift Hsu up", "give the books to Mary"
AResultative"hammer the metal flat"
VCausative"make the child laugh"
NCopular / ECM"consider John a fool"

The SC analysis unifies these constructions structurally: they share the tree shape V [SC Subj Pred] = node(leaf, node(leaf, leaf)), with differences reduced to the category of the predicate head.

Cross-linguistic extension #

Bantu applicative morphemes (-il-, -el-) and Japanese causative -(s)ase are analyzed as affixal particles: grammaticalized instances of P-to-V incorporation. Low applicatives introduce the same structural configuration as particles — SC predication between a goal and a theme, mediated by a P head.

Category of the predicate head in a small clause.

@cite{dendikken-1995}: X ∈ {A, N, P, V} — the four LEXICAL categories. The SC family is parameterized by which lexical category serves as the predicate head.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A small clause: subject-predicate pair where the predicate is categorially typed (@cite{dendikken-1995}:27, ex. 44).

      [SC subject predicate]

      The predCat field determines which member of the SC family this instance belongs to.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Build the syntactic object for a small clause: [SC Subj Pred].

          Equations
          Instances For

            Embed a small clause under a verb: V [SC Subj Pred].

            Equations
            Instances For

              The construction type name for each SC predicate category.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Companion predicate #

                The bundled structure SmallClause is the Submonoid-style API object: it carries data + the predicate-category discriminator. The companion predicate IsSmallClause : SyntacticObject → Prop lets us ask "is this raw SO an SC?" without constructing a SmallClause. Mathlib analogue: Submonoid (structure) + IsSubmonoid (predicate).

                Use this companion to characterize SC encodings written as raw merge-built SyntacticObjects (the prevailing style in study files like HaddicanEtAl2026, Phenomena/ArgumentStructure/Studies/Dendikken1995) without forcing them through the SmallClause constructor.

                @[reducible, inline]

                Head category of a syntactic object: the leftmost terminal's outer category. By the Minimalist projection convention used in our encodings, the head precedes its complement, so the LEFT child of any non-leaf projects.

                Phase 1.0: noncomputable via outerCat (which is itself Quot.out-based after the FreeCommMagma migration). The simp lemmas headCat_leaf / headCat_node no longer hold by rfl and have been removed; consumers should use SyntacticObject.outerCat directly.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  A syntactic object qualifies as a small-clause predicate iff its head category is one of @cite{dendikken-1995}'s four SC-licensed lexical categories (P/A/V/N).

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    The "right daughter" of an SO under planar Quot.out. Phase 1.0 placeholder — Phase 2 will replace with an HeadFunction-aware selection of the predicate-side daughter.

                    Retained as a noncomputable accessor for downstream code that actively wants the planar choice. The IsSmallClause predicate no longer routes through this — see below for the swap-respecting Multiset reformulation.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      A syntactic object IS a small clause when it is a binary node (subject + predicate) some immediate daughter of which satisfies IsSmallClausePredicate. Den Dikken's SC structure (book p. 132 ex. 52a) has the form [SC Spec XP] with Spec one daughter and the projecting predicate XP the other; under MCB nonplanar Merge we don't structurally distinguish "left" from "right", so the swap-invariant formulation asks "one of the immediate daughters is the predicate".

                      This existential matches the consumer pattern: the test discharges when either the SC's predicate is structurally findable, regardless of which Quot.out representative was chosen. Computable via immediatelyContains (which is decidable and Multiset-based).

                      Equations
                      Instances For
                        @[implicit_reducible]
                        Equations

                        merge-form rewrite for IsSmallClause. Symmetric — by the swap- invariant existential, the predicate can be either the left or the right child.

                        Round-trip: any SmallClause whose stored predCat agrees with its predicate's actual head category yields a SyntacticObject satisfying IsSmallClause. The hypothesis is the well-formedness invariant the free-form SmallClause constructor doesn't enforce by type — for the standard PVC/Resultative/etc. constructors that use mkLeafPhon matching predCat.toCat, the hypothesis discharges by rfl.

                        Whether an applicative head is analyzable as an affixal particle.

                        Low applicatives introduce a transfer/possession relation between goal and theme — structurally, a P head relating two DPs via SC predication. This is the same configuration as particles.

                        High applicatives relate the applied argument to the event, not to the theme — they are NOT affixal particles.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Map low applicatives to SC predicate category P. Low Appl mediates the same structural relation as a particle: [SC Goal [XP Theme]] where the applicative head is the P.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Low recipient applicatives are affixal particles.

                            Low source applicatives are affixal particles.

                            High applicatives are NOT affixal particles.

                            Low recipient applicatives map to SC predicate category P.

                            Low source applicatives map to SC predicate category P.

                            High applicatives have no SC predication analog.