Defective Circumvention #
@cite{storment-2025} @cite{storment-2026} @cite{roberts-2010}
Storment's defective circumvention probing operation (@cite{storment-2025}, ch. 2; cited as eq. 59 in @cite{storment-2026}):
A probe P enters into an Agree relation with a higher defective goal α and then conditionally goes on to Agree past α with a lower, more featurally specified goal β.
Two outcomes per @cite{storment-2026}:
- No circumvention → 3sg "default" agreement (the unvalued probe features that α couldn't supply are spelled out as default values).
- Successful circumvention → agreement tracks β when β's features are compatible with what was already acquired from α.
Circumvention can fail when β's features conflict with α's (@cite{storment-2026} §3.1.4): if α gave [Person:3] and β has [Person:1], the second cycle produces "an irresolvable and uninterpretable feature conflict on the T⁰ probe."
Storment's empirical predictions #
- Setswana QI: re-probe disallowed → defective theme → SM17 default
- English QI with 3rd-person plural agent: re-probe allowed,
features compatible → tracks agent (
advise the dieticians) - English QI with 1st/2nd person agent: re-probe attempted but
features clash → falls back to default → ungrammatical with agent
agreement (
*ask we)
The four outcomes of a probing operation that may or may not invoke defective circumvention.
- trackHigher : ProbingOutcome
The higher goal α was not defective; α suffices, no re-probe needed.
- defaultAgreement : ProbingOutcome
α was defective; re-probe was disallowed; default features spell out.
- trackLower : ProbingOutcome
α was defective; re-probe to β succeeded (β features compatible).
- featureClash : ProbingOutcome
α was defective; re-probe to β attempted but β's features conflict with what was acquired from α; derivation crashes.
Instances For
Equations
- Minimalist.Probing.instDecidableEqProbingOutcome x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Defective circumvention probing. Given a probe and two candidate goals (α higher, β lower), parameterized by:
allowReprobe— language- or construction-specific flag governing whether the probe may search past a defective goalcompatible— feature-compatibility predicate on(α, β)deciding whether circumvention can complete without conflict.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
When the higher goal is not defective, circumvention is never invoked.
When the higher goal is defective and re-probe is disallowed, the result is default agreement (Storment's Setswana case).
When the higher goal is defective, re-probe is allowed, and β's
features are compatible: circumvention tracks β (Storment's English
advise the dieticians case).
When the higher goal is defective, re-probe is allowed, but β's
features conflict with α's: derivation crashes (Storment's English
*ask we case).