Specificity Condition #
@cite{fiengo-1987} @cite{huang-1982b} @cite{shen-huang-2026}
A variable inside a specific DP cannot be bound by an operator outside that DP. This is a binding-theoretic constraint on wh-dependencies, independent of movement or the PIC.
Two notions of "specificity" #
@cite{fiengo-1987} ties specificity to Heim's familiarity theory of definiteness: a specific nominal is one whose referent is "already familiar at the current stage of the conversation." Demonstrative-marked DPs are paradigmatically specific in this sense.
@cite{cheng-sybesma-1999} use "specificity" differently — for them it is about whether an indefinite nominal gets a particular-individual reading. Bounded predicates (e.g., perfective VPs) force a "specific" reading on indefinite objects, but these DPs are NOT islands for subextraction. @cite{shen-huang-2026} §2.2 argue that the extraction-relevant notion is Fiengo's familiarity-based specificity, not Cheng & Sybesma's.
Coverage #
The Specificity Condition accounts for:
- Definite island effects in wh-movement (English: @cite{chomsky-1973})
- Definite island effects in wh-in-situ (Mandarin Chinese: @cite{huang-1982b}, @cite{shen-huang-2026})
- Wh-indefinite sensitivity to demonstratives in Chinese (@cite{li-1992}, @cite{shen-huang-2026} Experiment 3)
- Island effects for relativization (@cite{ross-1967})
- Island effects for unselective binding (@cite{li-1992})
The PIC independently constrains overt movement; the Specificity Condition independently constrains binding. Both are needed for full crosslinguistic coverage (@cite{shen-huang-2026} §4.1).
A DP is specific iff its referent is discourse-familiar in the sense of @cite{fiengo-1987}: "already familiar at the current stage of the conversation."
Demonstrative-marked DPs are specific; indefinite DPs (introduced with a/an, one-CL) are nonspecific. This is the extraction-relevant notion, not @cite{cheng-sybesma-1999}'s predicate-dependent specificity.
Equations
Instances For
Demonstratives project the familiarity/strong-article layer, hence are always specific for purposes of the Specificity Condition.
The kind of operator attempting to bind into the DP.
- whTrace : ExternalOperator
Overt wh-movement leaves a trace/copy inside the DP
- questionOperator : ExternalOperator
Covert question operator binds an in-situ wh-phrase (@cite{li-1992}, @cite{aoun-li-1993})
- existentialClosure : ExternalOperator
Existential closure binds a wh-indefinite (@cite{li-1992}: wh-phrases as indefinites)
- relOperator : ExternalOperator
Relativization operator
- focusOperator : ExternalOperator
Focus operator
Instances For
Equations
- Syntax.Binding.SpecificityCondition.instDecidableEqExternalOperator x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Whether an external operator's binding into a DP is blocked by the Specificity Condition.
A variable inside a specific DP cannot be bound by an operator
outside the DP.
@cite{shen-huang-2026}: this condition applies uniformly to both
overt wh-movement (where the "variable" is a trace) and wh-in-situ
(where the "variable" is the in-situ wh-phrase itself, bound by
a covert question operator).
Holds when binding is BLOCKED.
Equations
- Syntax.Binding.SpecificityCondition.blocked _op dpSpecificity = Syntax.Binding.SpecificityCondition.isSpecific dpSpecificity
Instances For
Specificity Condition blocks binding into definite DPs.
Specificity Condition allows binding into indefinite DPs.
The Specificity Condition is insensitive to operator type — it blocks all external operators equally when the DP is specific. This is the key prediction that distinguishes it from the PIC, which is sensitive to movement type.
In Chinese, wh-phrases can be interpreted as indefinites ("something", "someone") when bound by an existential closure operator. @cite{li-1992} reports that this indefinite reading is blocked when the wh-phrase appears inside a demonstrative-marked (specific) DP.
(i) Wǒ yǐwéi tā ná-le [yì-zhāng shénme rén de xiàngpiàn]. ✓
'I thought he took away a picture of someone.'
(ii) *Wǒ yǐwéi tā ná-le [nà-zhāng shénme rén de xiàngpiàn]. ✗
Intended: 'I thought he took away that picture of someone.'
@cite{shen-huang-2026} Experiment 3 confirms this contrast experimentally (β = −0.48, s.e. = 0.15, t = −3.32, p < 0.01).