Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Tense.SOT.Ambiguity

Past-tense ambiguity (concept-level) #

@cite{ogihara-1996}

The structural commitment that past tense morphology in embedded contexts is ambiguous between a genuine-past reading (temporal precedence) and a zero-tense reading (bound variable, no independent temporal content). Originally proposed by @cite{ogihara-1996}; rejected by @cite{kratzer-1998} (who treats past as never ambiguous, with the simultaneous reading deriving from deletion at LF) and finessed by @cite{klecha-2016} (who derives the simultaneous reading from modal-base × tense composition without past-tense ambiguity).

This file carries the type-level commitment (the 2-case enum). The paper-attributed theorems and the Ogihara-vs-Kratzer divergence claim live in Phenomena/TenseAspect/Studies/Ogihara1996.lean.

Mathlib analogue: this is a Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean-style substrate — orders that aren't successor-preorders simply don't import it; theories that don't share Ogihara's ambiguity thesis simply don't import this file.

Two readings of past morphology in embedded contexts (Ogihara).

  • genuinePast : PastReading

    Genuine past: temporal precedence (R < eval time).

  • zeroTense : PastReading

    Zero tense: bound variable, no independent temporal content.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Structural distinctness of the two readings. The theoretical significance of the distinction (i.e., that this is the Ogihara-vs-Kratzer divide) is in the Studies file.