Past-tense ambiguity (concept-level) #
@cite{ogihara-1996}
The structural commitment that past tense morphology in embedded contexts is ambiguous between a genuine-past reading (temporal precedence) and a zero-tense reading (bound variable, no independent temporal content). Originally proposed by @cite{ogihara-1996}; rejected by @cite{kratzer-1998} (who treats past as never ambiguous, with the simultaneous reading deriving from deletion at LF) and finessed by @cite{klecha-2016} (who derives the simultaneous reading from modal-base × tense composition without past-tense ambiguity).
This file carries the type-level commitment (the 2-case enum). The
paper-attributed theorems and the Ogihara-vs-Kratzer divergence
claim live in Phenomena/TenseAspect/Studies/Ogihara1996.lean.
Mathlib analogue: this is a Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean-style
substrate — orders that aren't successor-preorders simply don't import
it; theories that don't share Ogihara's ambiguity thesis simply don't
import this file.
Two readings of past morphology in embedded contexts (Ogihara).
- genuinePast : PastReading
Genuine past: temporal precedence (R < eval time).
- zeroTense : PastReading
Zero tense: bound variable, no independent temporal content.
Instances For
Equations
- Semantics.Tense.SOT.Ambiguity.instDecidableEqPastReading x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Both readings are available for past-under-past in SOT languages.
Equations
Instances For
Structural distinctness of the two readings. The theoretical significance of the distinction (i.e., that this is the Ogihara-vs-Kratzer divide) is in the Studies file.