Covert Operators: Theory and Compositional Interface #
@cite{krifka-etal-1995} @cite{carlson-1977} @cite{guerrini-2026}
Covert operators (Gen, DIST, Hab, DPP) are semantically contentful LF nodes with no overt realization. This module provides:
Abstract quantifier theory (
covertQ,measure,thresholdQ) — domain-polymorphic semantics with eliminability proofs. GEN and HAB are both instances.Montague-typed constructors (
gen,genThreshold,dist,dpp,hab) —LexEntryvalues that compose via FA inevalTree. These package the theory-layer semantics for tree-based interpretation.
Usage #
open Semantics.Quantification.CovertQuantifier (genThreshold dist dpp extendLexicon)
def myLex : Lexicon FyModel :=
extendLexicon baseLex
[("Gen", genThreshold myFrame atoms 2 3),
("DIST", dist myFrame atomsOf)]
A covert quantifier: ∀d ∈ domain. restriction(d) → scope(d).
GEN instantiates with D = Situation, restriction = normal ∧ restrictor.
HAB instantiates with D = Occasion, restriction = characteristic.
Equations
- Semantics.Quantification.CovertQuantifier.covertQ domain restriction scope = domain.all fun (d : D) => !restriction d || scope d
Instances For
Dual formulation: no counterexample exists.
Equations
- Semantics.Quantification.CovertQuantifier.covertQ_dual domain restriction scope = !domain.any fun (d : D) => restriction d && !scope d
Instances For
The two formulations are equivalent (De Morgan).
Measure: proportion of restriction-satisfying cases where scope holds.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Threshold-based alternative: measure > θ.
Equations
- Semantics.Quantification.CovertQuantifier.thresholdQ domain restriction scope θ = decide (Semantics.Quantification.CovertQuantifier.measure domain restriction scope > θ)
Instances For
Measure is non-negative.
Measure is at most 1 (when restriction domain is non-empty).
Any covert quantifier configuration can be matched by threshold semantics.
Note: this is a degeneracy result — the existential threshold is either -1 (if Q holds) or 1 (if Q fails). It shows eliminability in principle, not that the threshold is informative. The RSA treatment adds substance by making the threshold uncertain and pragmatically inferred.
Gen: (e→t) → (e→t) → t. Dyadic generic quantifier.
generally encodes the truth conditions — different theories
instantiate it differently (threshold, normalcy, probabilistic).
traditionalGEN (in Generics.lean) and thresholdQ (above)
are specific instantiations.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Gen with threshold: true iff ≥ num/denom of restrictor-satisfying
atoms also satisfy scope. Montague-typed counterpart of thresholdQ.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
DIST: (e→t) → (e→t). Distributive operator.
atomsOf x returns the atomic parts of x — for atomic entities
it returns [x], for plural/kind entities their parts.
Montague-typed counterpart of Distributivity.distMaximal.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
DPP: (e→t) → (e→t) → t. Derived Property Predication.
DPP(P)(Q) = ∃x[P(x) ∧ Q(x)]. An existential type-shift for kind-denoting NPs combining with stage-level predicates. @cite{guerrini-2026} structure (105b).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hab: (e→t) → (e→t). Habitual aspectual operator.
h maps a predicate to its habitual counterpart.
Montague-typed counterpart of traditionalHAB (in Habituals.lean).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
EXH: (s→t) → (s→t). Exhaustivity operator (proposition modifier).
exhOp maps a proposition to its exhaustified version — typically
asserting the prejacent and negating innocently excludable alternatives.
The canonical computational implementation is exhIE from
Exhaustification.Innocent (the Set-spec is exhIE in
Exhaustification.Operators). Specific instances are plugged in at
lexicon construction time with alternatives and world domain baked
into the closure.
Unlike Gen/DIST/Hab (which quantify over entities), EXH operates on
propositions (s→t). Both compose via FA in the same tree — the
Montague type system handles the dispatch:
- Gen:
(e→t) → (e→t) → t— FA with entity predicates - EXH:
(s→t) → (s→t)— FA with propositions
Equations
- Semantics.Quantification.CovertQuantifier.exh F exhOp = { ty := Core.Logic.Intensional.Ty.t.intens ⇒ Core.Logic.Intensional.Ty.t.intens, denot := exhOp }
Instances For
Extend a lexicon with named covert operators.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.