Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Presupposition.Accommodation

Accommodation #

@cite{lewis-1979} @cite{beaver-2001} @cite{van-der-sandt-1992}

Accommodation is the process by which a context is adjusted to satisfy a presupposition that is not already entailed. @cite{lewis-1979} introduced the concept: "If at time t something is said that requires presupposition P to be acceptable, and if P is not presupposed just before t, then — ceteris paribus — presupposition P comes into existence at t."

Three Levels (@cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5) #

Three Strategies #

  1. Heim/Lewis preference: prefer global > intermediate > local. Global preference + consistency constraint ≈ Gazdar's cancellation (@cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.8.1).
  2. Van der Sandt structural: DRT-based move-α; presupposition DRS is moved to the highest accessible position (@cite{van-der-sandt-1992}).
  3. Fauconnier flotation: presupposition floats upward through mental spaces, leaving a shadow at each level (@cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.8.3).

Constraints (@cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.3) #

The level at which accommodation occurs. @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5, @cite{lewis-1979}, @cite{heim-1983}.

  • global : AccommodationLevel

    Add presupposition to the global common ground.

  • local : AccommodationLevel

    Satisfy presupposition within the local embedded context.

  • intermediate (depth : ) : AccommodationLevel

    Add presupposition at an intermediate level (e.g., restrictor of a quantifier, antecedent of a conditional). @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.5 argues this is heavily restricted.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        @[reducible, inline]

        Global accommodation: update the context to include the presupposition. @cite{lewis-1979}: "presupposition P comes into existence."

        Delegates to Core.PresuppositionContext.accommodate.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Trapping: a presupposition with a bound variable cannot be accommodated above its binder. @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.3.

          Modeled as a predicate on the accommodation level and a binding depth: accommodation at level l is trapped if the presupposition is bound at depth d and l would place it above d.

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

            All constraints bundled together. Uses canonical operations from Core.PresuppositionContext.

            Instances For

              An accommodation strategy determines which level of accommodation is preferred. @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.8.

              • heimPreference : AccommodationStrategy

                Heim/Lewis: prefer global, fall back to local if global is inconsistent. Global preference ≈ projection; local fallback ≈ cancellation. @cite{heim-1983}, @cite{lewis-1979}.

              • vanDerSandt : AccommodationStrategy

                Van der Sandt: DRT-based move-α. Presupposition DRS is moved to the highest accessible position that satisfies binding constraints. @cite{van-der-sandt-1992}.

              • fauconnierFlotation : AccommodationStrategy

                Fauconnier: presupposition floats upward through mental spaces, leaving a copy ("shadow") at each intermediate level. @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.8.3.

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Select accommodation level based on the Heim/Lewis strategy.

                  Try global first; if inconsistent, fall back to local.

                  @cite{heim-1983}: "by stipulating a ceteris paribus preference for global over local accommodation, we recapture the effect of Gazdar's assumption that presupposition cancellation occurs only under the threat of inconsistency."

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Heim's observation: global accommodation preference is equivalent to Gazdar's cancellation under threat of inconsistency.

                    When global accommodation would be inconsistent, we fall back to local accommodation — which has the same effect as Gazdar's presupposition cancellation.

                    @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.8.1: "with one short remark buried in a terse paper, Heim offers a simple synthesis between the two antitheses of 1970s presupposition theory."

                    When global accommodation IS consistent, Heim's strategy projects the presupposition globally — matching Karttunen's projection.

                    Intermediate accommodation is problematic.

                    @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.5 argues that intermediate accommodation (accommodation into the restrictor of a quantifier or antecedent of a conditional) is heavily restricted and only occurs with generic/habitual statements. Without intermediate accommodation, both Heim's CCP and van der Sandt's DRT make better predictions.

                    This is formalized as: the Heim preference strategy never selects intermediate accommodation.

                    Van der Sandt vs. Fauconnier: the key difference is whether accommodation leaves shadows at intermediate levels.

                    • Van der Sandt: presupposition jumps to highest position, no trace at intermediate levels.
                    • Fauconnier: presupposition floats up, leaving a copy at each level it passes through.

                    @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.8.3: Fauconnier's strategy correctly predicts that lexical triggers (factives) must hold at all intermediate levels, while anaphoric triggers (definites, 'too') only need to hold at the highest level.

                    • anaphoric : TriggerClass

                      Anaphoric/resolution triggers: definites, 'too', 'again'. Collect entities from context. Use van der Sandt strategy.

                    • lexical : TriggerClass

                      Lexical triggers: factives ('know', 'regret'). Impose conditions on concept application. Use Fauconnier strategy.

                    Instances For
                      @[implicit_reducible]
                      Equations
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Select accommodation strategy based on trigger class. @cite{beaver-2001} Ch. 5.8, following Zeevat (1992).

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For