Posterior-threshold modality #
A simplified posterior-based necessity operator: must φ iff
P(φ) > θ for some contextual threshold. This is the baseline
posterior competitor against which more sophisticated probabilistic
operators (@cite{lassiter-2017}, @cite{chung-mascarenhas-2024},
@cite{goodhue-2017}, the threshold-PMF tradition) define themselves.
It is not a faithful Lassiter operator — Lassiter's account adds
context-conditionalization, an alternatives clause, and an epistemic /
deontic asymmetry. Use mustPosterior only where the goal is to expose
posterior-monotonicity as a structural constraint that necessity
accounts may or may not satisfy.
Headline structural fact #
posterior_cannot_predict_conjunction_fallacy: a one-line corollary
of the substrate theorem
Semantics.Modality.ThresholdOperator.subsetFallacy_blocked_by_monotone
applied to posteriorEval_isPosteriorMonotone. The modal-conjunction-
fallacy direction (sub-claim true at θ, super-claim false at θ) is
impossible under any posterior-monotone eval — and posteriorEval is
trivially posterior-monotone via PMF.probOfSet_mono.
The posterior eval function as an EvalFn: just probOfSet packaged
in the shared shape.
Equations
Instances For
Posterior is monotone — immediate from PMF.probOfSet_mono.
Posterior-threshold necessity: must φ iff P(φ) > θ. The simplest
probability-based necessity operator.
Equations
Instances For
Structural impossibility of the modal conjunction fallacy under
posterior-threshold necessity. One-line corollary of
subsetFallacy_blocked_by_monotone applied to
posteriorEval_isPosteriorMonotone.