Evaluative Measure Semantics for Deadjectival Intensifiers #
@cite{nouwen-2024} proposes that deadjectival intensifiers derive their degree function from the evaluative meaning of their adjectival base.
Core Idea #
An evaluative adjective (e.g., "horrible") has a measure function μ that assigns high values to degrees that are evaluated negatively.
For "horrible": μ_horrible(d) peaks at extreme degrees (far from the norm). For "pleasant": μ_pleasant(d) peaks at moderate degrees (near the norm).
Intensified Meaning #
Simplified from @cite{nouwen-2024} eq. 44–45; the RSA model (§4, eq. 72) uses this direct degree-level intersection:
⟦horribly warm⟧ = λd. warm(d) ∧ horrible(d)
The intensified positive form is the conjunction (intersection) of:
- The base adjective's positive meaning: d > θ_adj
- The evaluative measure exceeding its own threshold: μ_eval(d) > θ_eval
Note: the full compositional semantics (eq. 45) applies μ_D to a proposition about the degree, not directly to the degree. This simplification suffices for the RSA pragmatic model.
An evaluative measure function assigns a rational-valued "goodness of fit" score to each degree on a scale.
form: the adjectival base (e.g., "horrible")valence: evaluative valence from the Phenomena layermu: the measure function μ : Nat → ℚ (takes degree's Nat value)
The measure function captures how well a degree matches the evaluative meaning of the base adjective.
- form : String
- valence : Features.EvaluativeValence
- mu : ℕ → ℚ
Instances For
Evaluative measure for negative-evaluative bases (horrible, terrible, etc.).
μ_horrible(d) = |d - norm|
Peaks at extremes (d = 0 and d = max), lowest at the norm. Negative-evaluative adjectives evaluate extreme degrees as more salient, which is why "horribly warm" targets high degrees.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Evaluative measure for positive-evaluative bases (pleasant, nice, etc.).
μ_pleasant(d) = norm - |d - norm|
Peaks at the norm (middle degrees), lowest at extremes. Positive-evaluative adjectives evaluate moderate degrees as best, which is why "pleasantly warm" targets moderate degrees.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Intensified positive meaning (simplified from @cite{nouwen-2024} eq. 44–45).
⟦ADV-ly ADJ⟧(d, θ_adj, θ_eval) = (d > θ_adj) ∧ (μ_eval(d) > θ_eval)
The intensified form is the conjunction (intersection) of:
- The base adjective's positive form: d > θ_adj
- The evaluative threshold: μ_eval(d) > θ_eval
Equations
- Semantics.Gradability.Intensification.intensifiedMeaning eval d θ_adj θ_eval = (Semantics.Degree.positiveMeaning d θ_adj ∧ eval.mu d.toNat > ↑θ_eval.toNat)
Instances For
Equations
- Semantics.Gradability.Intensification.instDecidableIntensifiedMeaning eval d θ_adj θ_eval = id inferInstance
Intensified meaning entails the positive form.
If "horribly warm" is true, then "warm" is true. This is because the intensified meaning is a conjunction that includes the positive meaning as one conjunct.
The horrible measure peaks at extremes: μ(max) ≥ μ(norm).
Negative-evaluative adjectives assign highest values to extreme degrees.
The pleasant measure peaks at norm: μ(norm) ≥ μ(max).
Positive-evaluative adjectives assign highest values to moderate degrees.
Goldilocks structural theorem: at extreme degrees (d = max), the horrible measure exceeds the pleasant measure.
This is the semantic foundation of the Goldilocks effect: extreme degrees are more "horrible" than "pleasant".
Goldilocks structural theorem (converse): at moderate degrees (d = norm), the pleasant measure exceeds the horrible measure.
Moderate degrees are more "pleasant" than "horrible".
Bridge between evaluative valence and evaluative measure behavior: negative-evaluative measures peak at extremes, positive at the norm.
This connects the Phenomena-layer EvaluativeValence to the
Theory-layer EvaluativeMeasure structural properties.