Theories.Semantics.Focus.Comparability #
@cite{umbach-2004} @cite{erteschik-shir-1973} @cite{abeille-et-al-2020}
Theory predicates over the substance taxonomies in Features/:
- @cite{umbach-2004} alternative-set well-formedness (similarity + dissimilarity).
- @cite{erteschik-shir-1973} / @cite{abeille-et-al-2020} extraction-IS
clash constraint, parameterized over the two Krifka axes the
paper conflates: filler focus marking
(
Features.InformationStructure.FocusMark) and domain givenness (Features.BinaryGivenness).
The extractionISClash signature is (filler : FocusMark, domain : BinaryGivenness) → Prop, making the two-axis structure of the FBC
explicit. (ExclusionVariety and PolaritySwitchContext were
collapsed into Core.Discourse.Coherence.CoherenceRelation in the
0.230.488 cleanup.)
Alternative-Set Well-Formedness (@cite{umbach-2004} §2.2) #
@cite{umbach-2004} identifies two constraints that jointly determine when elements can serve as alternatives (in focus, coordination, or discourse):
Semantic independence: neither alternative entails the other (dissimilarity). Explains why #John had a drink and Mary had a martini is odd — "drink" subsumes "martini".
Common integrator: a concept subsuming all alternatives (similarity). Explains why alternatives must be of a comparable type.
Together these define comparability = similarity + dissimilarity, which is the prerequisite for any type of contrast.
Two propositions are semantically independent iff neither entails the other. @cite{umbach-2004} §2.2: required for alternatives in focus, coordination, and discourse relations. Violation explains the oddness of #John had a drink and Mary had a martini.
Equations
- Semantics.Focus.Comparability.semanticallyIndependent a b = (¬a ⊆ b ∧ ¬b ⊆ a)
Instances For
A common integrator subsumes all alternatives. @cite{umbach-2004} §2.2, following @cite{lang-1984}: coordinated elements and focus alternatives must share a common superordinate concept. For example, in "beer and martini", "drink" is the common integrator.
Equations
- Semantics.Focus.Comparability.commonIntegrator alts integ = ∀ a ∈ alts, a ⊆ integ
Instances For
A well-formed alternative set satisfies both constraints. @cite{umbach-2004} §2.2: alternatives must be comparable, i.e., similar (common integrator) and dissimilar (pairwise independent).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Extraction and Information-Structural Clash #
@cite{erteschik-shir-1973} @cite{abeille-et-al-2020}
Wh-extraction foregrounds ([FoC]) the moved element. Extracting from a backgrounded ([G]) domain creates an information-structural clash: the element is supposed to address the QUD (as [FoC]) but belongs to a dimension the QUD ignores (as [G]).
This is the constraint underlying both @cite{erteschik-shir-1973}'s Dominance Condition on Extraction and @cite{abeille-et-al-2020}'s Focus Background Constraint (FBC): "a focused element should not be part of a backgrounded constituent."
Information-structural extraction clash (@cite{erteschik-shir-1973}, @cite{abeille-et-al-2020}): a focused filler extracted from a given/backgrounded domain creates an incompatibility between the filler's discourse function (addressing the QUD) and the domain's discourse status (QUD-invisible).
The two parameters are independent Krifka axes — filler focus
marking (FocusMark, the binary focus axis) and domain givenness
(BinaryGivenness, the Prince hearer-status axis).
Use sites:
- MoS islands:
extractionISClash .focused domainGivenness(filler always focused; only the domain varies) - Subject islands:
extractionISClash (fillerFocus c) (subjectGivenness c)(filler focus and domain givenness both vary by construction) - General FBC: same shape, varying both arguments.
Equations
- Semantics.Focus.Comparability.extractionISClash filler domain = (filler = Features.InformationStructure.FocusMark.focused ∧ domain = Features.BinaryGivenness.given)
Instances For
Extraction of a focused filler from a given/backgrounded domain clashes.
Extraction from a non-given (new) domain does not clash, even when the filler is focused.
Non-focused extraction (e.g., relative clause heads, topics) does not clash, even when the domain is given.