Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Morphology.DM.PostSyntacticOps

Post-Syntactic Operations (Distributed Morphology) #

@cite{embick-noyer-2001} @cite{halle-marantz-1993}

Post-syntactic operations modify the output of the Syntax before Vocabulary Insertion. Linglib already has Impoverishment (feature deletion) and Fission (terminal splitting). This module adds the remaining operations from the DM inventory:

These operations apply after syntax and before Vocabulary Insertion, in the morphological structure (MS) — a representation derived from syntax that serves as input to VI.

@cite{kalin-bjorkman-etal-2026} §3.3.3, §4.2, §4.4, §4.5.2.

Lowering (@cite{embick-noyer-2001}): a head X adjoins downward to the head Y of its complement, at PF.

Precondition: X c-commands Y (X selects YP as complement). Effect: X affixes to Y, forming [Y X+Y] (or [Y Y+X]).

Canonical example: English tense lowering — T lowers to V at PF, yielding V+T (walk-ed). When lowering is blocked (by an intervening element), do-support repairs the structure.

Lowering is the PF counterpart of head raising: both produce complex heads, but lowering goes down (counter to the Head Movement Constraint). It is post-syntactic because the Syntax generates X above Y; the downward adjunction happens at PF.

  • source : Head

    The head that lowers (e.g., T).

  • target : Head

    The head it lowers to (e.g., V).

  • leftAdjoin : Bool

    Is the source head left-adjoined (prefix) or right-adjoined (suffix) to the target?

Instances For

    Apply lowering: merge source into target, producing a complex head. Returns the ordered pair of heads (left, right).

    Equations
    Instances For

      Local Dislocation (@cite{embick-noyer-2001}): takes two linearly adjacent elements X and Y (where X precedes Y), and adjoins X to Y (or vice versa), potentially reordering them.

      Unlike Lowering, Local Dislocation is sensitive to linear adjacency, not hierarchical structure. It cannot skip over intervening material.

      Notation from Embick & Noyer (2001):

      • Input: [X * [Y * Z]] (* = linear adjacency)
      • Output: [[ Y+X ] * Z] (+ = morphological attachment)

      Canonical use: p-bound clitics that "tuck in" to a phrase they are linearly adjacent to, appearing to disrupt constituency.

      • triggers : ElemBool

        Does this element undergo dislocation?

      • leftAdjoin : Bool

        Does the dislocated element left-adjoin or right-adjoin to its host?

      Instances For

        Fusion (@cite{halle-marantz-1993}): merges two adjacent terminal nodes into a single terminal before Vocabulary Insertion.

        The fused node bears the union of both terminals' features. A single Vocabulary Item then spells out the fused bundle, yielding a portmanteau.

        Canonical example: French du = Fusion of P[de] and D[le.MASC.SG]. The fused node [P, D, MASC, SG] is spelled out by the VI du.

        Fusion is the DM mechanism for deriving portmanteaux from syntactically distinct heads. It applies between structurally adjacent terminals (typically head and complement head).

        @cite{kalin-bjorkman-etal-2026} §4.4.

        • terminal1 : Terminal

          First terminal (structurally higher).

        • terminal2 : Terminal

          Second terminal (structurally lower / complement head).

        Instances For
          def Morphology.DM.PostSyntactic.FusionRule.apply {Terminal Features : Type} (r : FusionRule Terminal) (getFeatures : TerminalFeatures) (union : FeaturesFeaturesFeatures) :
          Features

          The result of Fusion: a single terminal bearing features from both inputs. Parameterized over a feature-union operation.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Dissociated Node Insertion (@cite{halle-marantz-1993}; @cite{embick-noyer-2001} call this "node-sprouting"): insertion of a morphosyntactic terminal node that has no source in the narrow syntactic derivation.

            Dissociated nodes are introduced post-syntactically to provide positions for morphemes that are "ornamental" — present in the morphological structure but not required by the syntax.

            Canonical examples:

            • Theme vowels in Romance: the vowel between verb root and inflectional suffix (cant-a-nt 'singing') has no syntactic source but is required for well-formedness.
            • Linkers in compounds: Dutch -s- in wetgeving-s-advies 'legislative advice'.
            • Agreement nodes: in some analyses, agreement morphemes are dissociated nodes inserted at PF, not present in syntax.

            @cite{kalin-bjorkman-etal-2026} §4.5.2.

            • features : List Feature

              Features borne by the inserted node (may be empty for purely phonotactic elements like theme vowels).

            • insertAfter : Bool

              Structural context: where is the node inserted? true = after the host terminal; false = before.

            Instances For