Documentation

Linglib.Syntax.Mereological.Basic

Syntactic objects of mereological syntax #

Mereological syntax builds structure by Subjoin, which makes one syntactic object a part of another, rather than by Merge, which collects two objects into a set: no new object is created, so no labeling algorithm is needed. Dimensionality allows each object one 1-part, the extended-projection complement, and one 2-part, the specifier.

This file defines the tree-shaped syntactic objects SynObj over the category labels MLabel, Subjoin on them, the complementation line (the 1-part chain, along which objects spell out together), and the correspondence of that line with the extended projection. Object identity across positions, and hence movement and Angular Locality, need the general parthood structure Parthood of Mereological/Parthood.lean.

Main definitions #

References #

Labels #

Category labels for syntactic objects in mereological syntax.

Labels that overlap with Minimalist.Cat (N, V, D, Q, etc.) are bridged via MLabel.toCat?. Labels specific to [adger-2025]'s analysis (Cl, Deg, Adv, O, Pred) have no Cat equivalent.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Bridge to Minimalist.Cat #

      Syntactic Objects #

      A syntactic object in mereological syntax.

      Each object has a label and at most two subparts, enforcing Dimensionality ([adger-2025]):

      • leaf l: bare object, no parts (0 dimensions)
      • sub₁ l x: x is 1-part of l (complement, dim 1)
      • sub₁₂ l x y: x is 1-part, y is 2-part (specifier, dim 2)

      The first subjunction is always dimension 1; the second dimension 2. No third subjunction is possible (the type has no 3-part constructor).

      In projectionist terms: 1-part ≈ complement, 2-part ≈ specifier.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Accessors #

          Whether the object has reached its dimensional maximum (2 parts).

          Equations
          Instances For

            Subjoin #

            Subjoin x to y: make x a part of y in the next available dimension. Returns none if y already has two parts (dimensionality violation).

            • First subjunction → 1-part (dimension 1)
            • Second subjunction → 2-part (dimension 2)
            Equations
            Instances For

              Complementation Line and Visibility #

              The complementation line (1-part chain): labels reachable by iterating the 1-part relation. Objects in this line can collectively spell out at the topmost node (marked by @ in [wang-sun-2026]).

              Equations
              Instances For

                Is there an object with label l in root's 1-part chain?

                Captures within-dimension-1 transitivity: if A <₁ B <₁ C, then A is reachable from C. Crucially, 2-parts of objects in the chain are NOT traversed — this restricted transitivity prevents cross-dimensional visibility ([adger-2025]).

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Extended Projection Bridge #

                  The nominal 1-part chain [N, Q, D] (leaf-to-root order), after mapping through toCat?, is a valid Extended Projection: all categories share [-V, +N] features (category-consistent) and F-values increase monotonically (N=0 ≤ Q=2 ≤ D=4).

                  The classifier label Cl is filtered out (no Cat equivalent). This does not affect EP validity — Cl spells out at Q and is not a separate EP layer in [grimshaw-2005]'s system.

                  The verbal 1-part chain [V, v, T, C] is a valid Extended Projection: all categories share [+V, -N] features and F-values increase (V=0 ≤ v=1 ≤ T=2 ≤ C=6).

                  Nominal and verbal labels map to different EP families — confirming that cross-EP 1-part chains would fail category consistency.