Documentation

Linglib.Studies.Borer2013

Borer 2013: categorizing roots and the adjective asymmetry #

This file formalizes the categorial paradigm of [borer-2013]'s chapter on categorizing roots. A root is a phonological index that a categorial frame realizes; the frame does the categorizing, so nothing is added to the form when a root occurs as a noun rather than a verb. On Morphology.Realization that fixes Ctx as the frame itself, with no head in it, where a Distributed Morphology instance would put a categorizer there.

The paradigm is Borer's (120)–(121): √DANCE and √CHAIR are licensed in the verbal and nominal frames but not the adjectival one, √GREEN and √BIG only in the adjectival frame. Her point is that the asymmetry survives the question of zero categorizers — a theory that mediates categorization through possibly-null category heads still has to rule these cells in and out one by one. Footnote 39 adds the residue: thin and yellow, but not red and fat, occur as verbs too, and since nothing about their adjectival behaviour predicts which, the verbal uses must be listed.

Main definitions #

Main results #

References #

The categorial frames a root may be realized in.

Instances For
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    @[instance_reducible]
    Equations
    def Borer2013.instReprFrame.repr :
    FrameStd.Format
    Equations
    Instances For
      inductive Borer2013.Root :

      The roots of (120)–(121) and footnote 39.

      Instances For
        @[instance_reducible]
        instance Borer2013.instDecidableEqRoot :
        DecidableEq Root
        Equations
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations
        @[instance_reducible]
        Equations
        def Borer2013.instReprRoot.repr :
        RootStd.Format
        Equations
        Instances For

          The exoskeletal system: where a frame licenses a root, the root is realized by its own phonological index. Categorization is the frame's doing, so the form is the same in every frame that licenses it.

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[simp]
            theorem Borer2013.isLicensed_iff (r : Root) (c : Frame) :
            english.IsLicensed r c licensed r c = true
            @[instance_reducible]
            Equations

            No root has more than one exponent: a root occurring in two frames is spelled the same in both, since the frame categorizes and no morphology is added. This is what distinguishes the exoskeletal instance from one whose Ctx carries a categorizer.

            (121b–c): a root licensed in the adjectival frame is licensed in neither of the others, save for the listed verbal uses of footnote 39 — no adjectival root at all is licensed in the nominal frame.

            (120b–c): outside the adjectival roots, noun-verb flexibility is systematic — the nominal and verbal frames license exactly the same roots.

            (120a) and (121b): no root is licensed in all three frames — the categorial systems do not fully overlap.

            Footnote 39: thin and red are alike in every frame but the verbal one, so a root's verbal cell is not a function of the rest of its paradigm. The verbal uses of to thin and to yellow cannot be predicted and must be listed.

            The same holds of yellow against fat: the pair of listed verbs is not a class the paradigm picks out.