Schwarz (2013): Two Kinds of Definites Cross-Linguistically #
@cite{schwarz-2013} @cite{hawkins-1978} @cite{schwarz-2009}
Cross-linguistic typology of the weak/strong article distinction. Schwarz identifies seven languages where the morphological article paradigm distinguishes a weak article (uniqueness/situational use) from a strong article (anaphoric/familiarity use), supporting his earlier @cite{schwarz-2009} analysis that the two definite articles correspond to different syntactic projections (D_det vs D_deix + D_det).
Core Generalizations #
- Strong → anaphoric: every surveyed language uses the strong article for anaphoric definites (§3.1.1).
- Weak → uniqueness: every surveyed language uses the weak article (or a bare nominal) for uniqueness-based definites (§3.1.2).
- Bridging splits: most languages split bridging across article forms — part-whole bridging takes weak, producer bridging takes strong (§3.2).
- Bare-nominal strategy: languages with only one overt article form (Akan, Mauritian Creole) use bare nominals for weak-article definites (§4.1).
- Haitian Creole exception: single determiner la for both anaphoric and uniqueness uses — no weak/strong split (§4.3).
The article-pronoun parallel (§5.5) is exploited by
@cite{patel-grosz-grosz-2017} (Studies/PatelGroszGrosz2017.lean), where
weak article ↔ PER pronoun and strong article ↔ DEM pronoun.
Per-language article paradigm from @cite{schwarz-2013}.
- language : String
- isoCode : String
- strongForm : Option String
Morphological form of the strong article (if any).
- weakForm : Option String
Morphological form of the weak article (if any).
- weakStrategy : Features.Definiteness.WeakArticleStrategy
How weak definites are expressed.
- strongForAnaphoric : Bool
Strong article used for anaphoric definites.
- weakForUniqueness : Bool
Weak article/bare nominal used for uniqueness/situational.
- bridgingSplit : Bool
Bridging shows the split (part-whole = weak, producer = strong).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Studies.Anaphora.Schwarz2013.instBEqSchwarzArticleDatum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All 7 languages from @cite{schwarz-2013} survey.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Strong article → anaphoric use (@cite{schwarz-2013} §3.1.1): all surveyed languages use the strong article for anaphoric definites.
Weak form → uniqueness/situational use (@cite{schwarz-2013} §3.1.2): all surveyed languages use weak articles (or bare nominals) for uniqueness-based definites.
Bridging split (@cite{schwarz-2013} §3.2): most languages split bridging across article forms (part-whole = weak, producer = strong). 5 of 7 languages show this pattern; Hausa lacks data, and Haitian Creole uses a single form for everything.
Bare-nominal strategy (@cite{schwarz-2013} §4.1): languages with only one overt article form (Akan, Mauritian Creole) use bare nominals for weak-article definites.
Haitian Creole is exceptional (@cite{schwarz-2013} §4.3): single determiner la for both anaphoric and uniqueness uses — no weak/strong split.
The semantic mapping is compositional (@cite{schwarz-2013} §2.2): weak article contributes uniqueness presupposition (ι-operator); strong article contributes familiarity/anaphoricity (index variable).