Docs / Semantics / Alternatives / Relevance

Relevance of alternatives

import Linglib.Semantics.Alternatives.Relevance · namespace Alternatives

Fox and Katzir restrict the formal alternatives of a sentence to the contextually relevant ones, with relevance closed under the Boolean operations. A sentence is exhaustively relevant given a restriction when its only-meaning lies in the Boolean closure of the restriction, and a restriction is allowable when it keeps the assertion and prunes nothing exhaustively relevant. A set in the Boolean closure of a family does not separate worlds that every member of the family treats alike (mem_iff_of_mem_closure), so an alternative whose only-meaning separates two such worlds is not exhaustively relevant (not_exhaustivelyRelevant_of_separates). Relevance relative to a context set is the same notion over the subtype of the context, each proposition restricted to it by preimage.

Main definitions

References

Declarations

A set in the Boolean closure of A does not separate worlds that every member of A treats alike.

theorem mem_iff_of_mem_closureL48–56
{W : Type u_1} {A : Set (Set W)} {X : Set W} {u v : W} (hX : X ∈ BooleanSubalgebra.closure A) (h : ∀ a ∈ A, u ∈ a ↔ v ∈ a) :
u ∈ X ↔ v ∈ X