CCG Cross-Serial Bridge #
@cite{bresnan-etal-1982} @cite{steedman-2000}
Connects CCG derivations (from Theories.Syntax.CCG.CrossSerial) to
empirical cross-serial dependency data (from Phenomena.WordOrder.CrossSerial).
Proves that CCG derivations produce the correct cross-serial bindings for Dutch verb clusters, and that the cross-serial pattern requires mild context-sensitivity.
A CCG derivation annotated with which NP binds to which verb.
- n : ℕ
Number of NP-verb pairs
- deriv : CCG.CrossSerial.ExtDerivStep
The derivation
- words : List String
Surface words
- binding : Features.VerbClusterBinding self.n
The NP-verb binding permutation
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Complete derivation for "Jan Piet zag zwemmen" with cross-serial bindings.
The derivation tree encodes the semantic dependencies:
- Jan combines with the matrix clause (subject of "zag")
- Piet is the argument picked up by zwemmen (subject of "zwemmen")
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Derivation for "Jan Piet Marie zag helpen zwemmen".
Uses the full B + B² derivation with verb-raising categories:
helpen gets ControlVR = ((S\NP)/NP)/(S\NP) which passes through an
/NP slot for its raised subject (Piet). The verb cluster composes
via B and B² into ((S\NP)/NP)/NP, a 3-place predicate that absorbs
Marie (outermost /NP → zwemmen), Piet (inner /NP → helpen), and
Jan (\NP → zag) — yielding the cross-serial binding pattern.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
CCG derivation for Dutch produces cross-serial bindings.
This is the key prediction: the compositional structure of CCG naturally yields cross-serial dependencies for Dutch verb clusters.
Both cross-serial derivations are well-formed (yield S) and match the data.
CCG correctly predicts the pattern type for Dutch.