Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.TemporalConnectives.Studies.Rett2020

@cite{rett-2020}: Antonymy + Aspectual Coercion #

@cite{rett-2020} @cite{rett-2026} @cite{jin-koenig-2021} @cite{krifka-2010b}before and after are antonyms on converse scales, with strong defaults @cite{de-swart-1998} @cite{dolling-2014} (before-start, after-finish). Non-default readings require aspectual coercion: INCHOAT (GLB, atelic → onset) or COMPLET (LUB, telic → telos), which incur processing cost.

Rett's formal analysis (eqs. 22a-b):

Both theories use ∃ over the main clause A: "some time in A bears the relation to (some characterization) B." They differ in how B's reference point is selected (all of B vs MAX of B).

Level #

Level 2 (interval sets): operates on SentDenotation directly, using maxOnScale from Core.Scale to select the informative bound.

Bridges #

Ambidirectionality #

before is truth-conditionally insensitive to negation of its argument (ambidirectional), which is why it licenses expletive negation cross- linguistically. after and while are not ambidirectional.

def Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.Rett.before {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (A B : SentDenotation Time) :

Rett's before (eq. 22a): ∃t ∈ times(A) [t ≺ MAX(times(B)_≺)]. Some time in A precedes the maximal (on the ≺ scale) time of B.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
    def Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.Rett.after {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (A B : SentDenotation Time) :

    Rett's after (eq. 22b): ∃t ∈ times(A) [t ≻ MAX(times(B)_≻)]. Some time in A succeeds the maximal (on the ≻ scale) time of B.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      def Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.INCHOAT {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (p : SentDenotation Time) :

      Inchoative coercion / GLB (@cite{rett-2020}, eq. 19; @cite{de-swart-1998}; @cite{dolling-2014}). Maps a process (atelic) denotation to a singleton containing its onset point. GLB(T) = ιt[t ∈ T ∧ ∀t' ∈ T, t ≤ t']

      Linguistically: "Amy was surprised" → "the start of Amy being surprised". Cross-linguistically realized as inchoative morphology (Russian -sja, Tagalog PFV.NEUT).

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        def Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.COMPLET {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (p : SentDenotation Time) :

        Completive coercion / LUB (@cite{rett-2020}, eq. 21; @cite{dolling-2014}). Maps a culmination (telic) denotation to a singleton containing its telos. LUB(T) = ιt[t ∈ T ∧ ∀t' ∈ T, t ≥ t']

        Linguistically: "Jane climbed the mountain" → "the moment Jane reached the top". Cross-linguistically realized as completive morphology (Tagalog AIA).

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          INCHOAT extracts the start point of a stative denotation.

          COMPLET extracts the finish point of an accomplishment denotation.

          Both theories predict "before-start" for statives.

          When B is stative (subinterval-closed), both theories reduce to "some time in A precedes all times in B":

          • Anscombe directly: ∃ t ∈ A, ∀ t' ∈ B, t < t'
          • Rett: ∃ t ∈ A, t < MAX(B_≺). For statives, MAX on ≺ picks B.start (the GLB), and t < B.start ↔ t < all times in B.

          Rett's analysis implies Anscombe's for telic "after".

          The converse does NOT hold: Anscombe.after only requires some point of B to precede some point of A (∃ t' ∈ B, t' < t), while Rett requires A to follow B's finish (t > MAX₍>₎(B) = i_B.finish). These differ when A overlaps B without extending past B's endpoint.

          Rett's before implies Anscombe's before in general.

          From Rett: t < m where m = min(timeTrace B). Since m < all other points in timeTrace B (by maxOnScale), t < every point in timeTrace B. This gives Anscombe's ∀-quantified conclusion.

          theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.rett_after_implies_anscombe {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (A B : SentDenotation Time) :

          Rett's after implies Anscombe's after in general.

          Immediate: m ∈ maxOnScale(timeTrace B) implies m ∈ timeTrace B, and t > m gives the existential witness for Anscombe.after.

          Expletive negation and ambidirectionality #

          @cite{rett-2026} shows that before is ambidirectional: negating B in "A before B" doesn't change truth conditions. This is why before-clauses license expletive negation cross-linguistically (@cite{jin-koenig-2021}: 50 of 74 EN-attesting languages, from a 722-language survey).

          The mechanism: for B = [s, f], both B and its pre-event complement (−∞, s] share s as their "most informative closed bound" on the < scale. The before construction relates A only to this bound, so negating B is truth-conditionally vacuous.

          After is NOT ambidirectional: negating B shifts the relevant bound. While requires total temporal overlap; ¬B fails when A overlaps B.

          theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.before_determined_by_max {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (A B₁ B₂ : SentDenotation Time) (h : Core.Scale.maxOnScale (fun (x1 x2 : Time) => x1 < x2) (timeTrace B₁) = Core.Scale.maxOnScale (fun (x1 x2 : Time) => x1 < x2) (timeTrace B₂)) :
          Rett.before A B₁ Rett.before A B₂

          Before truth conditions depend only on MAX₍<₎ of B's time trace.

          theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.rett_before_closedTrace_eq {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (A B : SentDenotation Time) (s f : Time) (hsf : s f) (htrace : timeTrace B = {t : Time | s t t f}) :
          Rett.before A B ttimeTrace A, t < s

          When B's time trace is a closed interval [s, f], Rett.before reduces to "∃ t ∈ A, t < s".

          COMPLET on a stative denotation extracts the finish point.

          def Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.preEventDenotation {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (bot : Time) (i : Core.Time.Interval Time) (hbot : bot i.start) :

          The pre-event complement of an event interval [s, f].

          Equations
          Instances For
            theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.timeTrace_stative_closedInterval {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (i : Core.Time.Interval Time) :
            timeTrace (stativeDenotation i) = {t : Time | i.start t t i.finish}

            The time trace of a stative denotation is the closed interval [start, finish].

            theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.maxOnScale_lt_stative {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (i : Core.Time.Interval Time) :
            Core.Scale.maxOnScale (fun (x1 x2 : Time) => x1 < x2) (timeTrace (stativeDenotation i)) = {i.start}

            MAX₍<₎ of a stative denotation's time trace is {start}.

            theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.timeTrace_complet_preEvent {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (bot : Time) (i : Core.Time.Interval Time) (hbot : bot i.start) :
            timeTrace (COMPLET (preEventDenotation bot i hbot)) = {t : Time | i.start t t i.start}

            The time trace of COMPLET(preEventDenotation bot i) is the degenerate interval {i.start}.

            theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.maxOnScale_lt_complet_preEvent {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (bot : Time) (i : Core.Time.Interval Time) (hbot : bot i.start) :
            Core.Scale.maxOnScale (fun (x1 x2 : Time) => x1 < x2) (timeTrace (COMPLET (preEventDenotation bot i hbot))) = {i.start}

            MAX₍<₎ of the COMPLET of a pre-event denotation is {start}.

            theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.before_preEvent_ambidirectional {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (A : SentDenotation Time) (i_B : Core.Time.Interval Time) (bot : Time) (hbot : bot i_B.start) :

            Before is truth-conditionally insensitive to event polarity.

            Both select the same boundary point s through different mechanisms: the original uses the default before-start reading (MAX₍<₎), while the negated version requires COMPLET coercion to extract the end of the pre-event interval.

            theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.after_not_ambidirectional {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (hab : ∃ (a : Time) (b : Time), a < b) :
            ¬∀ (A : SentDenotation Time) (B : Set Time), Core.Scale.isAmbidirectional (fun (X : Set Time) => ttimeTrace A, mCore.Scale.maxOnScale (fun (x1 x2 : Time) => x1 > x2) X, t > m) B

            After is NOT ambidirectional: negating B changes truth conditions because MAX₍>₎(B) ≠ MAX₍>₎(¬B).

            theorem Semantics.Tense.TemporalConnectives.while_not_ambidirectional {Time : Type u_1} [Inhabited Time] :
            ¬∀ (A B : Set Time), Core.Scale.isAmbidirectional (fun (X : Set Time) => tA, t X) B

            While is not ambidirectional.

            Temporal Connective Truth-Condition Examples #

            @cite{heinamaki-1974} @cite{rett-2020} @cite{karttunen-1974}

            Concrete scenarios verifying that the Anscombe, Rett, and Karttunen formalizations produce correct truth-value judgments.

            Scenarios 1–6 verify @cite{rett-2020} Table 1 for before/after. Scenarios 7–10 verify @cite{heinamaki-1974} Chs. 6, 8, 9 for since, by, till.

            Scenarios (ℕ time points) #

            #MEEEConnectiveResult
            1point(1)stative [5,10]beforeTrue
            2point(12)stative [5,10]afterTrue
            3point(1)accomplishment [3,8]beforeTrue
            4point(12)accomplishment [3,8]afterTrue
            5point(7)stative [5,10]beforeFalse
            6point(7)stative [5,10]afterFalse
            7stative[5,10]point(5)sinceTrue
            8point(1)point(3)byTrue
            9point(3)point(3)byTrue
            9'point(3)point(3)beforeFalse
            10stative[5,10]point(5)tillTrue

            EE: "she was president" — stative, running [5, 10].

            Equations
            Instances For

              "John left₁ before she was president₅₋₁₀" — True under Anscombe. Witness: t = 1 ∈ ME, and 1 < all t' ∈ [5, 10].

              "John left₁ before she was president₅₋₁₀" — True under Rett. Witness: t = 1, m = 5 (the GLB of [5, 10] on the ≺ scale).

              "John left₁₂ after she was president₅₋₁₀" — True under Anscombe. Witness: t = 12, t' = 5 (any point in EE suffices).

              "John left₁₂ after she was president₅₋₁₀" — True under Rett. Witness: t = 12, m = 10 (the LUB of [5, 10] on the ≻ scale).

              "John met Mary₁ before she climbed the mountain₃₋₈" — True under Anscombe. Witness: t = 1, and 1 < all t' in [3, 8].

              "John met Mary₁ before she climbed the mountain₃₋₈" — True under Rett. Witness: t = 1, m = 3 (the GLB of [3, 8] on the ≺ scale).

              "John met Mary₁₂ after she climbed the mountain₃₋₈" — True under Anscombe. Witness: t = 12, t' = 3.

              "John met Mary₁₂ after she climbed the mountain₃₋₈" — True under Rett. Witness: t = 12, m = 8 (the LUB of [3, 8] on the ≻ scale).

              "John left₇ before she was president₅₋₁₀" — False under Anscombe. Any witness t from ME (t=7) fails: t'=7 ∈ EE and ¬(7 < 7).

              "John left₇ after she was president₅₋₁₀" — False under Rett. The max on the ≻ scale is 10, and ¬(7 > 10).

              INCHOAT of "she was president₅₋₁₀" = {point(5)}. Verifies that inchoative coercion extracts the onset.

              COMPLET of "she climbed the mountain₃₋₈" = {point(8)}. Verifies that completive coercion extracts the telos.

              ME: punctual event at time 3 — "arrived at 3pm" (for by coincidence case).

              Equations
              Instances For

                "He has been happy₅₋₁₀ since she arrived₅" — True under Karttunen.since. Witness: t = 5 ∈ B, and ∀t' ∈ A (i.e., 5 ≤ t' ≤ 10), 5 ≤ t'.

                "He arrived₁ by 3pm₃" — True under Karttunen.by_. Witness: t = 1 ∈ A, and ∀t' ∈ B (t' = 3), 1 ≤ 3.

                "He arrived₃ by 3pm₃" — True under Karttunen.by_. Witness: t = 3 ∈ A, 3 ≤ 3 (coincidence allowed).

                "He arrived₃ before 3pm₃" — FALSE under Anscombe.before. Need 3 < 3, which fails. Shows bybefore.

                "He slept₅₋₁₀ till she arrived₅" — True under Karttunen.till. Witness: t = 5 ∈ both time traces (overlap).

                Not...until scenarios #

                Karttunen's identity: punctual until = ¬before (eq. 33). We verify this on concrete time points.

                #MEEEConstructionResult
                11point(3)point(5)not...untilTrue
                12point(3)point(5)presup + assertwhen
                13point(7)point(5)not...untilFalse

                EE: "The prince kissed her" — punctual event at time 5.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Scenario 11: "The princess woke up₃ before the prince kissed her₅" — TRUE. 3 < 5. This is the base before that gets negated in punctual until.

                  Scenario 11': "The princess didn't wake up₃ until the prince kissed her₅" — FALSE. NOT(BEFORE) = NOT(wake₃ before kiss₅) = ¬(3 < 5) = False. The princess DID wake up before the kiss, so "not until" is false.

                  ME: "The princess woke up" — punctual event at time 5 (AT the kiss).

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Scenario 12: "The princess didn't wake up₅ until the prince kissed her₅" — TRUE. NOT(BEFORE) = NOT(wake₅ before kiss₅) = ¬(5 < 5) = True. She woke up at exactly the time of the kiss.

                    Scenario 12': Presupposition (wake₅ before kiss₅ ∨ wake₅ when kiss₅) is satisfied: the waking happens at the kiss time (when), so the left disjunct is false but the right is true.

                    Scenario 12'': Presupposition + assertion → when (disjunctive syllogism). This is Karttunen's key result: "not until" + presupposition derives "when".

                    ME: "The princess woke up" — punctual event at time 7 (AFTER the kiss).

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Scenario 13: "The princess didn't wake up₇ until the prince kissed her₅" — TRUE. NOT(BEFORE) = NOT(wake₇ before kiss₅) = ¬(7 < 5) = True. She woke up after the kiss, so she didn't wake up before it.

                      Scenario 13'': The presupposition (before ∨ when) is NOT satisfied, so not...until is vacuously true but pragmatically infelicitous. This models why "She didn't wake up until the prince kissed her" is odd when she woke up AFTER the kiss — the presupposition fails.