Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Subjecthood.SubjectProperties

Subject Properties @cite{comrie-1989} #

@cite{comrie-1989} (Ch 5) argues that "subject" is not a primitive cross-linguistic category but a bundle of coding and behavioral properties. In accusative languages, all properties converge on the same NP (the S=A argument). In ergative languages, they may diverge: coding properties (case, agreement) pick out S=P (absolutive), while behavioral properties (conjunction reduction, reflexivization, raising) often pick out S=A.

Coding Properties #

How the "subject" NP is morphologically identified:

Behavioral Properties #

How the "subject" NP participates in cross-clausal syntactic operations:

Key Generalization #

In accusative languages, all properties pick out S=A → full convergence. In syntactically ergative languages (rare), coding picks out S=P while behavioral properties still pick out S=A. In morphologically ergative languages (common), coding picks out S=P but behavioral properties also pick out S=P (Dyirbal-type). The split between these patterns is one of the central diagnostics for "deep" vs "surface" ergativity.

Coding properties: how the subject NP is morphologically marked. These are "surface" properties visible from case and agreement alone.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Behavioral properties: how the subject NP participates in syntactic operations that span clause boundaries. These are the "deep" properties that motivate a grammatical-relation analysis.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          All coding properties (for finite enumeration).

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            All behavioral properties (for finite enumeration).

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              A subject property bundle: for each property, which NP grouping it picks out in a given language.

              • true = S=A grouping (accusative pattern for that property)
              • false = S=P grouping (ergative pattern for that property)

              A language's "subject" is well-defined when all properties agree; it is a non-primitive cluster concept when they diverge.

              Instances For

                Accusative convergence: all properties pick out S=A. English, Latin, Russian, Japanese, etc.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Morphological ergativity with accusative syntax: coding picks S=P (absolutive case/agreement), but behavioral tests pick S=A. This is the common pattern in "ergative" languages: Dyirbal main clauses, many Australian and Mayan languages.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Full (syntactic) ergativity: both coding AND behavioral properties pick out S=P. Rare cross-linguistically; Dyirbal subordinate clauses are the classic example.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Whether all subject properties converge on the same NP. Convergence means all coding and behavioral properties agree on either S=A (accusative) or S=P (ergative). Divergence — some properties picking S=A and others S=P — means "subject" is not a unitary concept in that language.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Accusative bundle converges: all properties pick out S=A.

                        Syntactic ergativity bundle converges: all properties pick out S=P.

                        Morphological ergativity diverges: coding picks S=P, behavioral picks S=A.