Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.SocialMeaning.Studies.Labov2006

@cite{labov-2006} — The Social Stratification of English in New York City #

Cambridge University Press (2nd edition, 2006; first edition 1966).

The foundational study of quantitative sociolinguistics. Labov establishes that linguistic variation in NYC is not "free" but forms a highly structured system along two independent dimensions: social class (measured by a composite socioeconomic index) and contextual style (measured by degree of attention to speech).

Core contributions formalized here #

  1. The department store study (Ch. 3): rapid anonymous survey showing (r) stratification across Saks, Macy's, and Klein employees (Table 3.4).

  2. Table 7.8 — Class stratification of the five variables (Ch. 7, p. 140): the centerpiece data matrix. Five phonological variables — (r), (æh), (oh), (th), (dh) — measured across three class groups (SEC 0–2, 3–5, 6–9) and multiple contextual styles. All five show both class stratification and style shifting (with one notable exception: the lower class shows no style shifting for (oh)).

  3. The (oh) real deviation (Ch. 7, p. 146): the lower class (0–2) shows no style shifting for (oh) and deviates from class stratification. This is the only "real deviation" in the five-variable system, providing evidence that (oh) is not socially significant for the lower class. Labov: "For the phonological variables, real deviations from class stratification are consistently and reciprocally associated with real deviations from stylistic stratification."

  4. (ing) stratification (Ch. 10, Table 10.10): the (ing) variable as a Case I-A pattern — stable stigmatized feature with monotone class and style stratification. The sc3/sc4 anomaly in casual speech for older speakers (upper-middle SEC 9 uses more /in/ than lower-middle SEC 7–8) reflects the (ing) crossover in informal contexts.

  5. Variable typology: all five phonological variables are markers (second-order indexicals showing style shifting). (r) is a change from above; (æh) and (oh) are changes from below; (th) and (dh) are stable.

The crossover pattern #

The most famous finding is the (r) crossover: in formal styles (D, D'), the lower-middle class (SEC 6–8) exceeds the upper-middle class (SEC 9) in use of the prestige variant, overshooting the target norm. This hypercorrection is characteristic of variables undergoing change from above. The crossover requires a finer class division (4+ groups) than Table 7.8's three-way split, so we formalize it as a structural concept via StratificationProfile.hasCrossover without stipulating the exact numbers from the finer-grained data.

Three-group classification from Table 7.8 (p. 140). The 10-point SEC index collapsed into three roughly equal groups (N: 23, 28, 30 informants respectively).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    def Labov2006.instReprClassGroup.repr :
    ClassGroupStd.Format
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      @[implicit_reducible]
      instance Labov2006.instDecidableLtClassGroup (a b : ClassGroup) :
      Decidable (a < b)
      Equations
      @[implicit_reducible]
      instance Labov2006.instDecidableLeClassGroup (a b : ClassGroup) :
      Decidable (a b)
      Equations

      NYC department stores ranked by prestige.

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        def Labov2006.instReprStore.repr :
        StoreStd.Format
        Equations
        Instances For

          Store prestige ranking: Klein < Macy's < Saks.

          Equations
          Instances For
            @[implicit_reducible]
            Equations
            @[implicit_reducible]
            instance Labov2006.instDecidableLtStore (a b : Store) :
            Decidable (a < b)
            Equations

            Distribution of (r) for complete responses (Table 3.4). Values are percentage of total responses in each category. N: Saks 33, Macy's 48, Klein 34.

            • allR1 :
            • someR1 :
            • noR1 :
            Instances For
              Equations
              Instances For
                def Labov2006.anyR1 (s : Store) :

                Any (r-1) usage = allR1 + someR1.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  (r) stratification: Saks > Macy's > Klein in any (r-1) usage.

                  (th) stops in fourth: Saks 0%, Macy's 4%, Klein 15%. Parallel stratification on an independent variable.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Table 7.8 is the centerpiece of the book: five phonological variables measured across three class groups (SEC 0–2, 3–5, 6–9) and multiple contextual styles. Data verified against the 2nd edition PDF (p. 140).

                    Index conventions (important for interpreting directions):

                    (r) index from Table 7.8. % (r-1) usage; higher = more prestige.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      (r) class stratification: middle > working > lower at every style. Higher class uses more of the prestige form (r-1) (Figure 7.1).

                      (æh) index from Table 7.8, per style. Vowel height × 10; higher = lower vowel = closer to standard. 4 styles (A–D); no minimal pair data.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        (æh) class stratification: middle > working > lower at styles A–C (higher index = closer to standard = less stigmatized; Figure 7.2). At Style D (word lists), lower and working converge (both 32).

                        (æh) style shifting: every class shifts toward standard (higher) in more formal styles. A < B < C < D for all three classes.

                        (oh) index from Table 7.8. Same convention as (æh): higher = closer to standard. 4 styles (A–D). The lower class (0–2) shows the "real deviation" — no style shifting and inverted class stratification.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The (oh) real deviation (@cite{labov-2006} Ch. 7, p. 146): the lower class does not treat (oh) as a socially significant variable.

                          Three key properties:

                          1. No style shift: lower class D (21) < A (23) — they move AWAY from standard in formal speech (the opposite of style shifting).
                          2. Middle class style shift: middle class shifts dramatically from 20 (A) to 29.5 (D), showing normal style correction.
                          3. Inverted class stratification: in casual speech (A), the middle class (20) has LOWER (oh) values (= more raised = more NYC) than the lower class (23), inverting the expected pattern where the lower class should be most NYC.

                          Labov: "it is oriented neither towards the class structure nor the stylistic structure."

                          Despite the real deviation, the working and middle classes show regular style shifting for (oh): values increase from A to D (shifting toward standard in more formal styles).

                          (th) index from Table 7.8. % non-fricative forms × 100; higher = more stigmatized. 3 styles only (A–C).

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            (th) class stratification: lower > working > middle at every style. The three class lines show regular separation (Figure 7.4).

                            theorem Labov2006.th_style_shift (g : ClassGroup) :
                            th_A g > th_B g th_B g > th_C g

                            (th) style shifting: every class uses fewer stops in more formal styles. A > B > C for all three classes.

                            (dh) index from Table 7.8. Same convention as (th). 3 styles (A–C).

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              (dh) class stratification: lower > working > middle at every style. Roughly parallel separation through all three styles (Figure 7.5).

                              theorem Labov2006.dh_style_shift (g : ClassGroup) :
                              dh_A g > dh_B g dh_B g > dh_C g

                              (dh) style shifting: every class uses fewer stops in more formal styles. A > B > C for all three classes.

                              The five phonological variables of the NYC study. All five show both class stratification and style shifting in Table 7.8, making them second-order indexicals (markers).

                              Instances For
                                @[implicit_reducible]
                                Equations
                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Classification of each variable by indexical order and change status, following @cite{labov-2006} Ch. 7.

                                  All five variables show style shifting (Table 7.8), making them markers (second-order). The lower class's "real deviation" for (oh) means (oh) is not a marker for that group, but the variable is a marker for the community overall.

                                  The change status reflects the direction and social mechanism:

                                  • (r): new prestige feature spreading from highest-status group → change from above
                                  • (æh): raised variant spreading from interior groups, below conscious awareness → change from below
                                  • (oh): raised variant spreading from interior groups, below conscious awareness → change from below
                                  • (th), (dh): stable stigmatized features, no change in apparent time → stable
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    All five NYC variables are markers (second-order indexicals).

                                    Average (ing) indexes by age and social class for adult white NYC informants (Table 10.10, p. 258). The index is percent /in/ forms (0–100). SC 1 = SEC 0–2, SC 2 = SEC 3–6, SC 3 = SEC 7–8, SC 4 = SEC 9.

                                    Note: the SC grouping for (ing) differs from the three-way split in Table 7.8 (0–2 / 3–5 / 6–9). Table 10.10 splits the middle range differently (3–6 / 7–8) and isolates SEC 9 as its own group.

                                    • sc1 :
                                    • sc2 :
                                    • sc3 :
                                    • sc4 :
                                    Instances For

                                      (ing) in Style A (casual speech), ages 20–39 (Table 10.10).

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        (ing) in Style A (casual speech), ages 40+ (Table 10.10).

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          (ing) in Style B (careful speech), ages 20–39 (Table 10.10).

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            (ing) in Style B (careful speech), ages 40+ (Table 10.10).

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              (ing) is monotonically stratified in Style A for young speakers: lower class > working > lower-middle > upper-middle.

                                              (ing) stratification in Style A for older speakers: sc1 > sc2 > sc3, but sc4 (23) > sc3 (21) — upper-middle class (SEC 9) uses MORE /in/ than lower-middle class (SEC 7–8) in casual speech. This is the (ing) crossover: the lower-middle class hypercorrects even in casual speech (dropping /in/ below the upper-middle class rate), while the upper-middle class does not.

                                              (ing) is monotonically stratified in Style B for older speakers. Unlike Style A, there is no sc3/sc4 anomaly.

                                              Style shifting: each class uses less /in/ in careful (B) than casual (A) speech, for older speakers.

                                              Instances For
                                                @[implicit_reducible]
                                                Equations
                                                def Labov2006.instReprINGStyle.repr :
                                                INGStyleStd.Format
                                                Equations
                                                Instances For
                                                  @[implicit_reducible]
                                                  Equations

                                                  Four-group SEC classification used in the (ing) data. (Different grouping from ClassGroup: SC2 = SEC 3–6.)

                                                  Instances For
                                                    @[implicit_reducible]
                                                    Equations
                                                    def Labov2006.instReprINGClass.repr :
                                                    INGClassStd.Format
                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For
                                                      @[implicit_reducible]
                                                      Equations
                                                      @[implicit_reducible]
                                                      Equations
                                                      @[implicit_reducible]
                                                      instance Labov2006.instDecidableLtINGClass (a b : INGClass) :
                                                      Decidable (a < b)
                                                      Equations
                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For

                                                        (ing) is a marker (second-order): it shows both social stratification and style shifting. Classified as Case I-A by @cite{labov-2006} — a stigmatized feature not involved in change.

                                                        Equations
                                                        Instances For