Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.Ronai2024

@cite{ronai-2024} — Embedded Scalar Diversity #

@cite{ronai-2024} @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016} @cite{gotzner-romoli-2018} @cite{chierchia-2004} @cite{chierchia-fox-spector-2012} @cite{bergen-levy-goodman-2016} @cite{potts-levy-2015} @cite{sauerland-2004} @cite{geurts-pouscoulous-2009} @cite{chemla-spector-2011}

The graded-rating sliding-scale paradigm Ronai 2024 adopts (via @cite{gotzner-romoli-2018}) descends from @cite{chemla-spector-2011}'s methodological innovation of measuring embedded-SI rates on a continuous cursor scale rather than via binary inference judgments. CS11 established that graded TVJ detects local readings that GP09's binary task missed; Ronai extends the paradigm to test whether the embedded-SI rate variation across @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016}'s 42 scales mirrors the global SI variation that VT-G first documented.

Theory-neutral empirical data from @cite{ronai-2024}.

Central Question #

Do embedded scalar implicatures (under universal quantifiers) show the same cross-scale variation ("scalar diversity") as global SIs? And do the same properties of alternatives predict this variation?

Argumentative Structure #

  1. Embedded SIs exist (Exp 1, §3, N=118): Using @cite{gotzner-romoli-2018}'s sliding-scale paradigm with 42 scales under every, the "strong" condition (e.g., "Every soup was warm" → "No soup was hot") is rated significantly above the false control (Estimate=−26.12, SE=1.47, t=−17.81, p<.001), confirming participants compute embedded SIs.

  2. Embedded scalar diversity mirrors global (Exp 1, §3.3): Strong inference rates vary across the 42 scales and correlate strongly with @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016}'s global SI rates (r=0.76, p<.001).

  3. Alternative-based predictors explain the variation (Exp 1, §3.3):

    • Semantic distance: Estimate=7.28, SE=3.29, t=2.21, p<.05
    • Boundedness: Estimate=18.37, SE=4.41, t=4.17, p<.001
  4. Binary replication rules out baseline concerns (Exp 2, §4, N=45): Using @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016}'s Yes/No inference task, the same pattern emerges: global–embedded correlation r=0.80 (p<.001), with both semantic distance (Estimate=0.63, SE=0.31, z=2.05, p<.05) and boundedness (Estimate=1.54, SE=0.39, z=3.91, p<.001) significant.

  5. Alternative-based accounts supported (§5): Results favor accounts that build in scalar alternatives — the grammatical theory (@cite{chierchia-2004}; @cite{chierchia-fox-spector-2012}), modified neo-Gricean (@cite{sauerland-2004}), or neo-Gricean RSA-LU (@cite{potts-levy-2015}) — over unconstrained RSA-LU (@cite{bergen-levy-goodman-2016}), which cannot explain why alternative-driven variation arises in both global and embedded contexts.

Data Provenance #

Scale properties (global SI rate, semantic distance, boundedness) are imported from VanTielEtAl2016.Scales rather than duplicated. The 42 scales are @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016}'s 43 minus ⟨few, none⟩.

Embedded SI rates are computed from the raw data deposited at https://osf.io/kx42p/ — per-scale means of the "strong" condition from exp1_data.csv (Exp 1, 0–100 sliding scale) and exp2_data.csv (Exp 2, binary Yes/No converted to % "Yes"). Values are rounded to the nearest integer.

Embedded SI data for a single scale.

Scale properties (global SI rate, semantic distance, boundedness) reference @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016} directly rather than duplicating values. Embedded SI rates are from @cite{ronai-2024}'s two experiments, computed from the raw data at https://osf.io/kx42p/.

  • VT2016 scale entry (provides global SI rate, semantic distance, bounded)

  • exp1Rate :

    Mean strong inference rate from Exp 1 (0–100 sliding scale, rounded)

  • exp2Rate :

    % "Yes" responses in Exp 2 strong condition (rounded)

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Global SI rate from @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016} Exp 2 (%).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Semantic distance from @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016} Exp 4 (1–7 Likert).

        Equations
        Instances For

          Boundedness from @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016} (author-annotated).

          Equations
          Instances For
            Equations
            Instances For
              Equations
              Instances For
                Equations
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                Instances For
                                  Equations
                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    Instances For
                                      Equations
                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        Instances For
                                          Equations
                                          Instances For
                                            Equations
                                            Instances For
                                              Equations
                                              Instances For
                                                Equations
                                                Instances For
                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For
                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For
                                                      Equations
                                                      Instances For
                                                        Equations
                                                        Instances For
                                                          Equations
                                                          Instances For
                                                            Equations
                                                            Instances For
                                                              Equations
                                                              Instances For
                                                                Equations
                                                                Instances For
                                                                  Equations
                                                                  Instances For
                                                                    Equations
                                                                    Instances For
                                                                      Equations
                                                                      Instances For
                                                                        Equations
                                                                        Instances For
                                                                          Equations
                                                                          Instances For
                                                                            Equations
                                                                            Instances For
                                                                              Equations
                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                All 42 scales tested in @cite{ronai-2024}.

                                                                                Equations
                                                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                Instances For

                                                                                  Bounded scales (by VT2016 annotation).

                                                                                  Equations
                                                                                  Instances For

                                                                                    Non-bounded scales.

                                                                                    Equations
                                                                                    Instances For

                                                                                      Experiment 1: @cite{gotzner-romoli-2018} sliding-scale paradigm. 119 recruited, 1 excluded (bilingual), N=118. Within-subjects (Latin Square), 42 critical items × 4 conditions.

                                                                                      Equations
                                                                                      Instances For

                                                                                        Experiment 2: @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016} binary inference task (Yes/No). N=45 (all data reported). Within-subjects, 42 critical items.

                                                                                        Equations
                                                                                        Instances For

                                                                                          Mean sliding scale response by condition, computed from raw data. Reference level is "strong"; contrasts reported in the paper: true−strong: Estimate=55.6, SE=2.75, t=20.19, p<.001 weak−strong: Estimate=12.79, SE=1.93, t=6.62, p<.001 false−strong: Estimate=−26.12, SE=1.47, t=−17.81, p<.001

                                                                                          • trueControl :
                                                                                          • weakInference :
                                                                                          • strongInference :
                                                                                          • falseControl :
                                                                                          Instances For
                                                                                            Equations
                                                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                            Instances For
                                                                                              Equations
                                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                                Response ordering: true > weak > strong > false. This replicates @cite{gotzner-romoli-2018}'s finding across 42 scales.

                                                                                                Strong inference significantly above false control: embedded SIs exist. The 26-point gap corresponds to Estimate=−26.12, t=−17.81 in the regression.

                                                                                                Mixed-effects regression coefficient.

                                                                                                • predictor : String
                                                                                                • estimate :

                                                                                                  Estimate (unstandardized)

                                                                                                • se :

                                                                                                  Standard error

                                                                                                • statistic :

                                                                                                  Test statistic (t for LMER in Exp 1, z for GLMER in Exp 2)

                                                                                                Instances For
                                                                                                  Equations
                                                                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                                  Instances For

                                                                                                    Exp 1: Semantic distance → strong inference (p<.05).

                                                                                                    Equations
                                                                                                    Instances For

                                                                                                      Exp 1: Boundedness → strong inference (p<.001).

                                                                                                      Equations
                                                                                                      Instances For

                                                                                                        Exp 2: Semantic distance → strong inference (p<.05).

                                                                                                        Equations
                                                                                                        Instances For

                                                                                                          Exp 2: Boundedness → strong inference (p<.001).

                                                                                                          Equations
                                                                                                          Instances For

                                                                                                            Exp 1: Pearson r between VT2016 global SI rate and Exp 1 strong inference. r=0.76, p<.001.

                                                                                                            Equations
                                                                                                            Instances For

                                                                                                              Exp 2: Pearson r between VT2016 global SI rate and Exp 2 strong inference. r=0.80, p<.001.

                                                                                                              Equations
                                                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                                                Both predictors are significant in Exp 1 (t > 1.96).

                                                                                                                Both predictors are significant in Exp 2 (z > 1.96).

                                                                                                                Boundedness has a larger effect than semantic distance in both experiments. This parallels @cite{van-tiel-geurts-2016}'s finding that boundedness dominates the combined model.

                                                                                                                Exp 2 correlation is at least as strong as Exp 1. The binary task (less noisy) yields a tighter global–embedded relationship.

                                                                                                                Both correlations are strong (r > 0.70).

                                                                                                                theorem Ronai2024.bounded_higher_both_exps :
                                                                                                                List.foldl (fun (x1 x2 : ) => x1 + x2) 0 (List.map (fun (x : EmbeddedSIDatum) => x.exp1Rate) boundedScales) > List.foldl (fun (x1 x2 : ) => x1 + x2) 0 (List.map (fun (x : EmbeddedSIDatum) => x.exp1Rate) nonBoundedScales) List.foldl (fun (x1 x2 : ) => x1 + x2) 0 (List.map (fun (x : EmbeddedSIDatum) => x.exp2Rate) boundedScales) > List.foldl (fun (x1 x2 : ) => x1 + x2) 0 (List.map (fun (x : EmbeddedSIDatum) => x.exp2Rate) nonBoundedScales)

                                                                                                                Bounded scales yield more embedded SIs than non-bounded in both experiments. Total rates across 20 bounded scales exceed total across 22 non-bounded, despite having fewer items.

                                                                                                                ⟨some, all⟩ embedded SI rate substantially above the overall mean (30), consistent with it being a "workhorse" scale for SI research.

                                                                                                                ⟨may, will⟩ is an outlier: very high global SI rate (VT2016 Exp 2 = 89%) but extremely low embedded SI rate (Exp 1 = 7), suggesting embedding under every disrupts SI for this modal scale specifically.

                                                                                                                The global SI rate for each scale is derived from VT2016, not stored independently. This structural test verifies the derivation: ⟨some, all⟩'s global SI rate matches VT2016 Exp 2 by construction.

                                                                                                                Boundedness is derived from VT2016, not stored independently.