Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.BaleEtAl2025

@cite{bale-etal-2025} — Competence by Default #

Bale, A. C., Noguchi, H., Rolland, M. & Barner, D. (2025). Competence by default: Do listeners assume that speakers are knowledgeable when computing conversational inferences? Journal of Semantics 42(1–2): 39–55.

Core Contribution #

Tests whether the competence assumption in scalar implicature derivation (step 5 of @cite{soames-1982} / @cite{horn-1989} / @cite{sauerland-2004}) is a cognitive default or must be contextually licensed. The 5-step derivation:

  1. Speaker said φ (e.g., "some of the marbles are red")
  2. There exists a stronger alternative ψ (e.g., "all of the marbles are red")
  3. Speaker didn't say ψ (Quantity)
  4. Therefore ¬Bel_S(ψ) — weak implicature
  5. With competence (Bel_S(ψ) ∨ Bel_S(¬ψ)), derive Bel_S(¬ψ) — strong SI

Step 5 depends on the competence assumption: the listener assumes the speaker knows whether ψ. Three hypotheses about when this is applied:

Experimental Design #

Dual-task paradigm with 2 × 2 design:

Key Finding #

GLMM reveals a significant Knowledge × Load interaction (β = 2.62, SE = 0.86, χ²(1) = 11.3, P < .001): load increases SSI rate in the PK (ignorant) condition (10% → 23.3%) while non-significantly decreasing it in the FK (competent) condition (65.6% → 56.7%). This crossover supports competence-by-default: load impairs effortful cancellation of the default competence assumption.

Total participants (N = 60, n = 30 per load group).

Equations
Instances For

    Experimental Conditions #

    Speaker's epistemic state regarding the stronger alternative ψ.

    Manipulated via cover story: speaker either looked in all sections of a box (full knowledge) or only some sections (partial knowledge).

    • fullKnowledge : SpeakerKnowledge

      Full Knowledge: speaker inspected all sections, knows whether ψ

    • partialKnowledge : SpeakerKnowledge

      Partial Knowledge: speaker inspected only some sections, ignorant of ψ

    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Cognitive load manipulation (between-subjects).

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            A full experimental condition: speaker knowledge × cognitive load.

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Observed SSI Rates #

                  Rates are stored in tenths of a percent to preserve the one-decimal-place
                  precision reported in the paper (e.g., 233 = 23.3%). 
                  

                  Observed strong scalar implicature rate for one condition.

                  • The experimental condition

                  • rateTenths :

                    SSI rate in tenths of a percent (e.g., 233 = 23.3%)

                  • n :

                    Number of participants in this load group

                  Instances For
                    def BaleEtAl2025.instReprSSIRate.repr :
                    SSIRateStd.Format
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      FK + No Load: 65.6% SSI rate (baseline for competent speaker).

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        FK + Load: 56.7% SSI rate (non-significant decrease, P = .22).

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          PK + No Load: 10.0% SSI rate (competence properly canceled).

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            PK + Load: 23.3% SSI rate — the key finding. Load impairs cancellation of the default competence assumption, yielding more SSIs despite speaker ignorance.

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              Interaction Test #

                              The key statistical test: Knowledge × Load interaction in a GLMM. 
                              

                              Result of the Knowledge × Load interaction test (GLMM, logistic).

                              • beta : Float

                                Interaction coefficient

                              • se : Float

                                Standard error

                              • chiSq : Float

                                Chi-squared statistic (likelihood ratio, 1 df)

                              • p : Float

                                p-value

                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  The observed interaction: β = 2.62, χ²(1) = 11.3, P < .001.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    The interaction is significant (P < .05).

                                    Load Effects by Condition #

                                    The crossover interaction: load increases SSIs for PK speakers but decreases SSIs for FK speakers.

                                    Load increases SSI rate in PK condition by 13.3 percentage points.

                                    The interaction magnitude: the difference in load effects across knowledge conditions is positive (PK effect > FK effect).

                                    Competing Hypotheses #

                                    Three hypotheses about the status of the competence assumption.

                                    • competenceByDefault : CompetenceHypothesis

                                      Competence is assumed by default; cancellation requires effortful processing. Load impairs cancellation → more SSIs when speaker is actually ignorant.

                                    • ssiByDefault : CompetenceHypothesis

                                      The entire SI derivation is a default; load disrupts SI computation itself. Predicts load decreases SSI rates.

                                    • contextualLicensing : CompetenceHypothesis

                                      Competence must be contextually licensed; it is not a default. Load should not increase SSI rates for ignorant speakers — competence was never assumed, so there is nothing to fail to cancel.

                                    Instances For
                                      @[implicit_reducible]
                                      Equations
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Whether a hypothesis predicts a positive Knowledge × Load interaction (i.e., load increases SSI more — or decreases it less — in PK than FK).

                                        This is the key discriminating prediction: only competence-by-default predicts a positive interaction.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          Connects the experimental findings to the NeoGricean competence formalization in Pragmatics.Implicature.Core.

                                          FK speaker: processAlternative yields a strong SI.

                                          PK speaker (correctly identified): weak-only SI.

                                          The default belief state: listeners assume speakers are competent.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            The effective belief state after (possibly failed) context integration.

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              Under load + PK, the default competence yields a strong SI (10% → 23.3%).

                                              Under no-load + PK, correct context integration yields weak-only (10%).