Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Embedded.Questions

RSA Question Embedding #

@cite{geurts-2010} @cite{hamblin-1973b} @cite{groenendijk-stokhof-1984}

Models scalar implicatures embedded in questions.

The Phenomenon #

"Did some students pass?"

Questions have a unique status regarding scalar implicatures:

Theoretical Background #

Questions are often analyzed as sets of propositions or partitions of logical space. The key insight:

A question "Did some students pass?" asks the hearer to choose between:

If the implicature "not all" is computed:

The second option doesn't make sense, suggesting local SI in questions is problematic.

Predictions #

Unlike assertions (where local SI strengthens) or DE contexts (where local SI weakens), questions create an asymmetry:

RSA should predict: Local SI is dispreferred in questions because it makes one answer pragmatically odd.

Student outcome for question scenario.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

      Worlds represent the actual state of affairs.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        A yes/no question partitions the world into "yes" and "no" answers.

        For "Did some students pass?":

        • Yes-worlds: where some (>=1) passed
        • No-worlds: where none passed
        Instances For

          Interpretations of "Did some students pass?":

          1. Global: "some" = at least one
          • Yes: someP, allP (some passed)
          • No: noneP (none passed)
          1. Local: "some" = some-but-not-all
          • Yes: someP (some-but-not-all passed)
          • No: noneP, allP (?? disjunctive/weird)
          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

              The partition induced by each interpretation.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Global interpretation gives a natural partition:

                • Yes = some passed (continuous region on scale)
                • No = none passed (complementary region)

                Local interpretation gives a strange partition:

                • Yes = some-but-not-all (specific point)
                • No = none OR all (disjunctive!)

                This disjunctive "no" answer is pragmatically odd.

                The "no" answer under local interpretation is disjunctive. This is marked by the worlds being non-contiguous on the scale.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Exhaustive interpretation: the "yes" answer conveys the MAXIMAL true proposition consistent with "yes".

                  For global "Did some pass?":

                  • If someP: answer conveys "some but not all"
                  • If allP: answer conveys "all"

                  This makes local SI redundant - exhaustivity handles it.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Under local interpretation, the "all" world gets a "no" answer, which is pragmatically bizarre.

                    RSA predicts: global interpretation preferred for questions.

                    Reason: Local creates pragmatically odd partition where "all passed" is a "no" answer.

                    Questions differ from all other embedding contexts:

                    • Not about entailment direction (like DE vs UE)
                    • About pragmatic naturalness of the question-answer structure
                    Instances For

                      Questions are indeed unique - neither DE-like nor attitude-verb-like in their entailment pattern, yet still prefer global.

                      Equations
                      Instances For