Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Quotation.Studies.Rudin2025LI

@cite{rudin-2025b}: Embedded Intonation and Quotative Complements #

Rudin, Deniz (2025/2026). "Embedded Intonation and Quotative Complements to Verbs of Speech." Linguistic Inquiry, early access. doi:10.1162/ling.a.554.

Empirical Generalizations #

The paper's central observation: verbs of speech systematically split on whether they accept rising-declarative ("quotative") complements:

Verb"p""p?""p" loud"p" whispthat pthat wh / Q
say
assert
yell
whisper
ask

Architecture: One Definition, Not Three #

Following mathlib practice, this file has no parallel formalizations.

There is no separate empirical : VerbComplement → Felicity function and no separate predicted decision function. The empirical matrix and its derivation are the same proposition.

Verbs of speech examined by @cite{rudin-2025b}.

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Complement types in the Rudin matrix.

      Instances For
        @[implicit_reducible]
        Equations
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          A complement is felicitous with a verb predicate in a given model iff there exists a witness — an event-and-performance pair (for quotative complements) or an event-and-content pair (for that-clauses) — satisfying the ontological constraints encoded by the complement type.

          Quotative complements constrain the REENACTed performance: quoteDecl requires a committing linguistic performance, quoteRising a rising declarative, quoteLoud/quoteWhispered a committing performance with the marked volume.

          Propositional complements constrain the CONTENT denotation: thatProp requires propositional content, thatQuestion requires question content.

          Verb-class felicity is then derived: a verb's postulates impose constraints on REENACTed performances (or CONTENT denotations); if those constraints conflict with the complement's, no witness exists and the cell is infelicitous.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            class Phenomena.Quotation.Studies.Rudin2025LI.IsRudinModel {Time : Type u_1} {SemObj : Type u_2} {Perf : Type u_3} [LinearOrder Time] {Ω : Semantics.Quotation.Demonstration.PerformanceOntology Perf} (M : Semantics.Quotation.Demonstration.SpeechVerbs Time SemObj Perf Ω) :

            A SpeechVerbs model satisfies @cite{rudin-2025b}'s empirical claims about English speech verbs. The 30 fields are exactly the cells of the verb × complement felicity matrix.

            This class IS the empirical claim. There is no separate empirical function whose values must be reconciled with model predictions — a model satisfies these facts or it does not.

            Instances

              We now build a concrete SpeechVerbs model over FBPerformance Bool with fbOntology as its performance ontology, and show it satisfies IsRudinModel. The model uses ℕ as the time type and Bool as the semantic-object type (true ↦ proposition, false ↦ question).

              Verb predicates are defined as the postulate RHS, so the meaning postulates hold by rfl. The discriminator for verb classes is runtime.start (0 = SAY, 1 = ASSERT, 2 = YELL, 3 = WHISPER, 4 = ASK). REENACT and CONTENT are defined per verb class to give the right witnesses and exclusions.

              A canonical event for each verb class, indexed by runtime.start.

              Equations
              Instances For

                The REENACT relation: per verb-class events have different REENACT targets, chosen so the postulates' universal quantifiers reduce to obvious tautologies (e.g., for SAY events, REENACT only relates to LINGMAT performances, so SAY's postulate ∀u, REENACT → LINGMAT is vacuously true).

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  The CONTENT relation: SAY-class events take propositional (true) content; ASK-class events take question (false) content; other events have no propositional content.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Verb predicates: defined as the postulate RHS so the iff-axioms hold by rfl.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              A non-LINGMAT RESP performance: a non-linguistic, non-rising interrogative (e.g., a wordless interrogative gesture). Its update is askPolarQuestion, which pushes an issue without committing. Used to falsify SAY for ASK-class events.

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Witness performances #

                                Concrete FBPerformance witnesses with named property proofs. Each witness pins down the exact field configuration that makes a particular cell of the matrix felicitous, and is referenced both in rudinModel's postulate proofs and in the IsRudinModel instance discharge.

                                A loud committing declarative performance.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  A whispered committing declarative performance.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    A rising-declarative performance (RESP, not committing).

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      A loud rising-declarative performance.

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        A whispered rising-declarative performance.

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          The Rudin model: a concrete SpeechVerbs instantiation over FBPerformance Bool with fbOntology as its performance ontology. Each meaning postulate holds by rfl since the verb predicates are defined as the postulate RHS.

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            All 30 cells of @cite{rudin-2025b}'s empirical matrix are derived from the FB-grounded model + the SpeechVerbs postulates.

                                            Classify an English VerbEntry into the Rudin verb taxonomy. Returns none for verbs that don't fall into the matrix (e.g., tell requires a recipient; think is not a speech act).

                                            Reads directly off Fragment fields — speechActVerb, takesQuestionBase, levinClass, and surface form — so the classification stays in sync with Fragment edits.

                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Per-entry classification witnesses #

                                              These examples pin individual Fragment verbs to the Rudin taxonomy. Renaming or reclassifying any of these verbs in the Fragment will break exactly the relevant witness, surfacing the inconsistency.

                                              Negative cases — verbs outside the Rudin matrix #