Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Presupposition.Gradience

Gradient Projection in Inference Judgments #

@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021} @cite{degen-tonhauser-2022} @cite{tonhauser-beaver-roberts-simons-2018}

Theory-neutral empirical observations about gradient patterns in presupposition projection and inference judgments.

Core Observations #

  1. Projection is gradient across predicates. Aggregate inference judgments for clause-embedding predicates vary continuously — there is no categorical gap separating "factive" from "nonfactive" predicates in projection strength.

  2. Prior beliefs modulate projection. Higher prior probability of the complement content leads to stronger projection, at both the group level and the individual participant level (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}).

  3. The gradient pattern is robust. The by-predicate ranking of projection strength replicates across experiments with Spearman's r = .991 (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}, Exp 1 vs Tonhauser & Degen 2020).

  4. Optionally factive predicates overlap with canonically factive ones. Some "optionally factive" predicates (e.g., inform) project more strongly than some "canonically factive" predicates (e.g., reveal) (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2022}).

Sources of Gradience #

Gradience in inference judgments may arise from multiple sources:

Whether gradient projection reflects resolved or unresolved indeterminacy is a theoretical question addressed by study files, not settled by the data alone.

Sources of gradience in inference judgment tasks.

  • resolved : GradienceSource

    Resolved on each occasion but varying across occasions (type-level).

  • unresolved : GradienceSource

    Persists even after fixing the interpretation (token-level).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      @[reducible]

      A specific application of GradienceSource to factivity. The @cite{grove-white-2025} paper frames the choice between the discrete (FDH) and gradient (FGH) hypotheses as a binary choice of source for the gradient projection observations.

      Defined as @[reducible] def rather than abbrev so the unfolding is explicit (mathlib convention).

      Equations
      Instances For

        The Fundamental Discreteness Hypothesis (@cite{grove-white-2025}): factivity is a discrete property of an expression on each occasion of use. Observed gradience arises from resolved indeterminacy.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The Fundamental Gradience Hypothesis (@cite{grove-white-2025}): there is no property distinguishing factive from non-factive occurrences. Gradient distinctions reflect gradient inference contributions.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Mechanisms by which resolved indeterminacy may be cashed out. Catalogue from @cite{grove-white-2025} (Sect. 6, p. 10). The FDH is neutral among them.

            • polysemy : ResolvedMechanism

              Polysemy: a predicate has multiple senses, at least one factive and at least one nonfactive (conventionalist account, Sect. 6.1).

            • structuralAmbiguity : ResolvedMechanism

              Structural ambiguity: a predicate occurs in multiple structures, at least one implicated in triggering projection and one not.

            • discourseSensitivity : ResolvedMechanism

              Discourse sensitivity: the predicate's complement content may or may not be entailed by a discourse construct like the QUD (conversationalist account, Sect. 6.2).

            Instances For
              @[implicit_reducible]
              Equations
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Subtypes of unresolved indeterminacy.

                Instances For
                  @[implicit_reducible]
                  Equations
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    A projection profile records how strongly a predicate's complement projects, separated by prior probability condition.

                    • highPrior : Float

                      Mean certainty rating with higher-probability background fact.

                    • lowPrior : Float

                      Mean certainty rating with lower-probability background fact.

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        The prior belief effect: higher prior → stronger projection.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Prior beliefs modulate projection: the effect is positive for every predicate studied. This is the core finding of @cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            A predicate's projection variability across contexts, collapsing over prior probability. The mean and range characterize how "reliably factive" a predicate is.

                            • mean : Float

                              Mean projection across all contexts.

                            • bimodal : Bool

                              Whether the predicate shows bimodal responses (modes near 0 and 1).

                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                The key empirical observation: no categorical gap between traditional classes in projection strength. Formalized as: for any threshold that separates "factive" from "nonfactive" by projection rating, at least one predicate from each traditional class falls on the wrong side.

                                • optFactivePred : String

                                  An "optionally factive" predicate that projects more strongly than some "canonically factive" predicate.

                                • canonFactivePred : String
                                • optFactiveRating : Float
                                • canonFactiveRating : Float
                                • overlap : self.optFactiveRating > self.canonFactiveRating
                                Instances For

                                  Witnessed by inform (0.81) > reveal (0.70) in @cite{degen-tonhauser-2022} Experiment 1a (sliding scale, collapsing over facts).

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For