Purver & Ginzburg (2004): Clarifying Noun Phrase Semantics #
@cite{purver-ginzburg-2004}
@cite{purver-ginzburg-2004} use fragment-reprise clarification data to constrain admissible NP denotations. The empirical lever is the Reprise Content Hypothesis (RCH): a fragment reprise question must query the standard semantic content of the fragment being reprised. Anything a theory says about NP denotation has to survive this test.
The empirical contrast #
A: Jo arrived yesterday. B: Jo? A: A thief broke in last night. B: A thief?
Both responses are reprise fragments. The first naturally queries identity ("who is Jo?"); the second cannot — it queries the property ("someone you believe to be a thief?") rather than identity ("which specific thief?"). The asymmetry tracks the referential / non-referential distinction on the host NP, not its surface form.
The argument against generalized-quantifier denotations #
Standard generalized-quantifier theory assigns a thief the denotation
λP. ∃x. thief(x) ∧ P(x) of type (e → t) → t. A reprise of this fragment,
if it queried the standard semantic content, would query at this functional
type — but no observed reprise ever does. The empirical record only shows
queries at individual or property type.
@cite{purver-ginzburg-2004} resolve this by splitting the sign's contextual parameters into two fields:
- dgb-params: referential entities, anchored against context
- q-params: existentially-bound indices, closed at proposition level
Both have the same record-type shape — record entries with INDEX and
RESTR(ICTION). The split lives at the sign level: 'Jo' contributes a
dgb-params entry; 'a thief' contributes a q-params entry. Reprises operate
on the q-params record, not on a higher-order GQ denotation. RCH then
does hold under this revised account.
What this file proves #
Two theorems about RCH (defined in
Theories/Pragmatics/Dialogue/KOS/RepriseContent.lean):
gq_reprise_type_mismatch: a predictor that licenses only.functionalqueries — the GQ prediction — fails Weak RCH against any reprise event whose observed content includes.individualor.propertyqueries.qparams_split_satisfies_weakRCH: the predictor derived from the q-params/dgb-params split (qParamsPredictor) satisfies Weak RCH by construction.
Both theorems take a RepriseEvent carrying a host LocProp; the LocProp's
new qcparams field (added in KOS/Basic.lean) is what makes the q-params
record visible at the reprise interface.
Sub-utterance 'a thief'.
Equations
- Phenomena.Dialogue.Studies.PurverGinzburg2004.aThiefSub = { phon := "a thief", cat := "NP", cont := "thief" }
Instances For
Host LocProp for "A thief broke in last night."
The non-referential 'a thief' contributes a q-param [x:IND, restr:thief(x)]
via the sign-level architecture in Grammar.lean.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The intended-content reprise of 'a thief' in this host.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The generalized-quantifier predictor (@cite{purver-ginzburg-2004} target):
licenses only .functional-typed queries, since GQ denotations have type
(e → t) → t. Stated as a predictor for empirical refutation.
Equations
Instances For
The observed reprise content for 'a thief' under intended-content reading
includes an .individual query — querying the witness of the existential.
The GQ predictor licenses only .functional queries — no .individual.
.individual is not in the GQ predictor's licensed set for any event.
Type-mismatch theorem (@cite{purver-ginzburg-2004}, @cite{ginzburg-2012} §8.5.1): the GQ predictor fails Weak RCH. Empirically, fragment reprises of indefinite NPs query at individual (and property) type; the GQ denotation predicts queries only at functional type. The two sets are disjoint, so even Weak RCH (observed ⊆ predicted) fails.
Witness: the 'a thief' / 'A thief?' reprise event constructed above.
The constructive alternative satisfies Weak RCH by construction.
@cite{purver-ginzburg-2004}'s revision routes 'a thief'-style indefinites
through the qcparams channel on the LocProp. The qParamsPredictor
licenses exactly the queries that reprisedContent reports — every
observed query is predicted, so Weak RCH holds. (Inherited from
qParamsPredictor_satisfies_weakRCH in
KOS/RepriseContent.lean; restated here for the empirical paper context.)
Sub-utterance 'Jo'.
Equations
- Phenomena.Dialogue.Studies.PurverGinzburg2004.joSub = { phon := "Jo", cat := "PROPN", cont := "jo" }
Instances For
Host LocProp for "Jo arrived yesterday."
'Jo' is referential — contributes a cparams entry, not qcparams.
Its reprise queries identity, not property.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
For 'Jo' (referential), the intended-content reprise queries a property over the sub-utterance's content — not an individual witness. The q-params channel is empty, so the property fallback applies.