Stassen 1985: Comparison and Universal Grammar #
@cite{stassen-1985}
Stassen's central claim is that the typology of comparative constructions is determined by the typology of temporal chaining constructions. Comparatives are not autonomous constructions but are "modelled upon" or "borrowed from" temporal chains (p. 105). The link runs through a diachronic pathway: "X is tall; Y is not tall" → "X is taller than Y".
Stassen 1985's six-way typology vs WALS 2013's five-way #
The 1985 book (110-language sample) classifies comparatives into six types:
separative, allative, locative (the three adverbial subtypes
collectively making up the "locational" category in WALS 2013), plus
exceed, conjoined, and particle. The WALS 2013 typology
(@cite{stassen-2013}, in the substrate Linglib/Typology/Comparison.lean)
collapses the spatial triad into single locational, dropping the spatial-
relation distinction that drives Stassen's explanatory universals connecting
comparison to temporal chaining.
This file holds the 1985-specific apparatus: the six-way ComparativeType1985
inductive, the case-assignment + fixed-encoding + spatial-case projections,
per-language 1985 type assignments, and the universal verifications.
Chaining strategies (Ch 4) #
Languages encode temporal chains using one of two basic strategies (§4.3.1, p. 76):
- Balancing: both predicates retain the same structural rank.
- Deranking: one predicate is structurally reduced.
Deranking subdivides into conditional (only same-subject chains) and absolute (regardless of subject identity).
The Principle of Parallel Chaining (p. 99): a language selects parallel options for consecutive and simultaneous chains.
The seven chaining-based universals (§5.2, pp. 106-108) #
| Universal | Comparative type | → Chaining type |
|---|---|---|
| 1A | derived-case | balancing |
| 1B | fixed-case | deranking |
| 2A | exceed | conditional deranking |
| 2B | adverbial (sep/all/loc) | absolute deranking |
| 3A | separative | abs. deranked anterior consecutive |
| 3B | allative | abs. deranked posterior consecutive |
| 3C | locative | abs. deranked simultaneous |
| 4 | conjoined | balanced simultaneous |
Particle comparatives are modelled on balanced chains (either simultaneous or consecutive), confirming Universal 1A (p. 108).
The six comparative construction types of @cite{stassen-1985} Ch 2.
Finer than the WALS 2013 types (Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType):
the three adverbial subtypes (separative, allative, locative) are
collapsed into a single "locational" category in WALS. The six types
form a hierarchy based on case assignment and syntactic encoding:
Comparative
/ \
Derived case Fixed case
/ \ / \
Conjoined Particle Exceed Adverbial
/ | \
Sep All Loc
- separative : ComparativeType1985
- allative : ComparativeType1985
- locative : ComparativeType1985
- exceed : ComparativeType1985
- conjoined : ComparativeType1985
- particle : ComparativeType1985
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.instDecidableEqComparativeType1985 x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Map @cite{stassen-1985} types to the coarser WALS 2013 types
(Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType).
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.separative.toWALS = Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType.locational
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.allative.toWALS = Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType.locational
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.locative.toWALS = Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType.locational
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.exceed.toWALS = Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType.exceed
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.conjoined.toWALS = Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType.conjoined
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.particle.toWALS = Typology.Comparison.ComparativeType.particle
Instances For
Case assignment for each 1985 type.
Equations
Instances For
Fixed-case encoding (only meaningful for fixed-case types).
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.exceed.fixedEncoding = some Core.FixedCaseEncoding.directObject
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.separative.fixedEncoding = some Core.FixedCaseEncoding.adverbial
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.allative.fixedEncoding = some Core.FixedCaseEncoding.adverbial
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.locative.fixedEncoding = some Core.FixedCaseEncoding.adverbial
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.conjoined.fixedEncoding = none
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.particle.fixedEncoding = none
Instances For
Spatial case of the standard marker (only meaningful for adverbial types).
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.separative.spatialCase = some UD.Case.abl
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.allative.spatialCase = some UD.Case.all
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ComparativeType1985.locative.spatialCase = some UD.Case.loc
- x✝.spatialCase = none
Instances For
Basic structural strategy for encoding temporal chains (§4.3.1, p. 76).
- balancing : ChainingStrategy
- deranking : ChainingStrategy
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.instDecidableEqChainingStrategy x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
For deranking languages: same-subject restriction or unconditional.
- conditional : DerankedConditionality
- absolute : DerankedConditionality
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.instDecidableEqDerankedConditionality x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
For absolutely deranked consecutive chains: which predicate is deranked.
- anterior : DerankedDirection
- posterior : DerankedDirection
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.instDecidableEqDerankedDirection x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Stassen's language type in temporal chaining (§4.7, pp. 98-101).
- balancing : ChainingLanguageType
- conditionalDeranking : ChainingLanguageType
- absoluteDeranking : ChainingLanguageType
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.instDecidableEqChainingLanguageType x✝ y✝ = if h : x✝.ctorIdx = y✝.ctorIdx then isTrue ⋯ else isFalse ⋯
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The chaining strategy for a language type.
Equations
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ChainingLanguageType.balancing.strategy = Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ChainingStrategy.balancing
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ChainingLanguageType.conditionalDeranking.strategy = Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ChainingStrategy.deranking
- Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ChainingLanguageType.absoluteDeranking.strategy = Phenomena.Comparison.Studies.Stassen1985.ChainingStrategy.deranking
Instances For
Universal 1A: derived-case comparative implies balancing chaining.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Universal 1B: fixed-case comparative implies deranking.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Universal 2A: exceed comparative implies conditional deranking.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Universal 2B: adverbial comparative implies absolute deranking.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Universal 1A and 1B partition the case-assignment space.
Particle and conjoined are the only derived-case types.
Adverbial types are exactly the spatial triad.
The three adverbial types all collapse to locational under WALS.
Derived-case types never map to locational.
Fixed-case types never map to particle.
Every adverbial type is fixed-case (by construction).
Japanese Fragment standard case matches 1985 spatial case prediction.
Korean Fragment standard case matches 1985 spatial case prediction.
Turkish Fragment standard case matches 1985 spatial case prediction.
Japanese Fragment standard marker matches the Fragment profile.
Korean Fragment standard marker matches the Fragment profile.
Turkish Fragment standard marker matches the Fragment profile.
All three separative Fragment entries use fixed case assignment.
All three separative Fragment entries use adverbial encoding.
Separative languages lack degree morphology (p. 28).
Japanese: Fragment (ablative) ↔ 1985 type (separative) ↔ chaining type (absolute deranking). All three layers agree.
Korean: three-layer consistency.
Turkish: three-layer consistency.
Korean: absolute deranking predicts non-finite medial verbs.