Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Classifiers.Studies.Aikhenvald2000

Aikhenvald (2000): Classifiers — A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices #

@cite{aikhenvald-2000} @cite{greenberg-1972} @cite{dixon-1982}

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2000). Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory. Oxford University Press.

Cross-linguistic typology of noun categorization systems following Aikhenvald's 7-property schema (A–G, §1.5). The schema (NounCategorizationSystem) lives in Typology/ClassifierSystem.lean; per-language data in Fragments/{Lang}/ClassifierSystem.lean.

This file aggregates the 7 currently-formalized systems (French/Italian/Mandarin/Japanese/Xhosa/Shona/Swahili) and verifies typological properties from @cite{aikhenvald-2000} (Tables 10.17, 15.1, 15.2) and @cite{greenberg-1972}'s classifier-number complementarity over that sample. None of the theorems below are universals over the abstract NounCategorizationSystem type — they are sample-restricted empirical claims; adding a counterexample language to the sample is the right way to falsify them.

Western Armenian is intentionally excluded from the main allSystems sample: it is non-obligatory with no unmarked default, and the Aikhenvald-style sample-restricted findings (sample_all_obligatory, sample_all_have_default) are about the obligatory-classifier subspace. Armenian appears separately in optionalClassifierSystems.

Chierchia-anchored claims about Mandarin/Japanese type-shift blocking are in Studies/NMP.lean (chronologically older paper, separate study file). The Greenberg classifier-number complementarity claim appears here (Aikhenvald §15 cites Greenberg) and is refined in Studies/LittleMoroneyRoyer2022.lean (CLF-for-N vs CLF-for-NUM split).

Languages whose Fragment is in allSystems are all obligatory.

Languages in the sample all have an unmarked default classifier/class.

@cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 15.1, sample-restricted: classifier-type systems lack agreement; noun-class systems have agreement.

East Asian classifier systems prefer physical properties (shape) — partial witness for Aikhenvald's cross-linguistic generalization.

French (the noun-class member of the sample) operates in head-modifier and predicate-argument scopes.

@cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 10.17: noun classes interact with more grammatical categories than numeral classifiers. Verified against the framework-agnostic interacts table in Typology.NounCategorization.

@cite{greenberg-1972}: numeral classifiers and obligatory number marking are in complementary distribution. Holds in the sample. Aikhenvald §15 endorses Greenberg's generalization; @cite{little-moroney-royer-2022} §3.4 refines it (CLF-for-N languages obey it, CLF-for-NUM languages — Ch'ol, Mi'gmaq — falsify it).

Mandarin and Japanese both have a semantically bleached default classifier (Mandarin 个 ge, Japanese つ tsu).

Non-default classifiers always carry at least one semantic parameter.

The three sampled Bantu languages have inventories in the @cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 15.1 noun-class range (≤ 20).

Languages with non-obligatory classifier systems (per WALS Ch 55 optional). Western Armenian is the worked example (@cite{bale-khanjian-2014}). Kept separate from allSystems because the sample-restricted findings above are over obligatory systems — Armenian is precisely the kind of language those generalizations don't cover.

Equations
Instances For