Aikhenvald (2000): Classifiers — A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices #
@cite{aikhenvald-2000} @cite{greenberg-1972} @cite{dixon-1982}
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2000). Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory. Oxford University Press.
Cross-linguistic typology of noun categorization systems following
Aikhenvald's 7-property schema (A–G, §1.5). The schema
(NounCategorizationSystem) lives in Typology/ClassifierSystem.lean;
per-language data in Fragments/{Lang}/ClassifierSystem.lean.
This file aggregates the 7 currently-formalized systems
(French/Italian/Mandarin/Japanese/Xhosa/Shona/Swahili) and verifies
typological properties from @cite{aikhenvald-2000} (Tables 10.17, 15.1,
15.2) and @cite{greenberg-1972}'s classifier-number complementarity over
that sample. None of the theorems below are universals over the abstract
NounCategorizationSystem type — they are sample-restricted empirical
claims; adding a counterexample language to the sample is the right way to
falsify them.
Western Armenian is intentionally excluded from the main allSystems
sample: it is non-obligatory with no unmarked default, and the
Aikhenvald-style sample-restricted findings (sample_all_obligatory,
sample_all_have_default) are about the obligatory-classifier subspace.
Armenian appears separately in optionalClassifierSystems.
Chierchia-anchored claims about Mandarin/Japanese type-shift blocking are
in Studies/NMP.lean (chronologically older paper, separate
study file). The Greenberg classifier-number complementarity claim
appears here (Aikhenvald §15 cites Greenberg) and is refined in
Studies/LittleMoroneyRoyer2022.lean (CLF-for-N vs CLF-for-NUM split).
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
The seven obligatory-classifier systems formalized so far.
Equations
Instances For
Languages whose Fragment is in allSystems are all obligatory.
Languages in the sample all have an unmarked default classifier/class.
@cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 15.1, sample-restricted: classifier-type systems lack agreement; noun-class systems have agreement.
French has agreement; Mandarin and Japanese do not (Table 15.1).
Numeral classifier systems have purely semantic assignment; the noun-class system has mixed assignment (@cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 15.2).
East Asian classifier systems prefer physical properties (shape) — partial witness for Aikhenvald's cross-linguistic generalization.
Animacy is attested in both Mandarin and Japanese classifiers.
Mandarin/Japanese classifier inventories exceed French's noun-class inventory. @cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 15.1 generalization.
Numeral classifiers operate inside numeral/quantifier NPs.
French (the noun-class member of the sample) operates in head-modifier and predicate-argument scopes.
@cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 10.17: noun classes interact with more
grammatical categories than numeral classifiers. Verified against the
framework-agnostic interacts table in Typology.NounCategorization.
@cite{greenberg-1972}: numeral classifiers and obligatory number marking are in complementary distribution. Holds in the sample. Aikhenvald §15 endorses Greenberg's generalization; @cite{little-moroney-royer-2022} §3.4 refines it (CLF-for-N languages obey it, CLF-for-NUM languages — Ch'ol, Mi'gmaq — falsify it).
Mandarin and Japanese both have a semantically bleached default classifier (Mandarin 个 ge, Japanese つ tsu).
Non-default classifiers always carry at least one semantic parameter.
The three sampled Bantu languages have inventories in the @cite{aikhenvald-2000} Table 15.1 noun-class range (≤ 20).
Languages with non-obligatory classifier systems (per WALS Ch 55
optional). Western Armenian is the worked example
(@cite{bale-khanjian-2014}). Kept separate from allSystems because
the sample-restricted findings above are over obligatory systems —
Armenian is precisely the kind of language those generalizations
don't cover.