Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Case.Studies.Karlsson2017

Finnish Case System @cite{karlsson-2017} #

@cite{krifka-1989}

The Finnish partitive case is the primary formal link between case marking and aspectual interpretation in the language (@cite{karlsson-2017}, Chs. 9, 12–13). The case of the direct object determines — or reflects — the telicity of the VP:

The partitive also appears obligatorily under negation: En lukenut kirja-a. 'I didn't read the book.'

This is the first bridge in linglib connecting Core.Case to Features.Telicity, making the case–aspect interaction formally verifiable.

Theoretical significance #

Finnish partitive is evidence for the Incremental Theme hypothesis: the object's referential properties (bounded vs. unbounded) compose with the verb's event structure to determine VP-level telicity. The case morphology makes this composition visible.

Context in which partitive case is obligatory (Karlsson §12.3).

Instances For
    @[implicit_reducible]
    Equations
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A partitive licensing datum: object case + licensing context + telicity.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          Instances For

            Accusative object, telic VP: 'I read the book (completely).'

            Equations
            Instances For

              Partitive object, atelic VP (irresultative): 'I was reading the book.'

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Partitive under negation: 'I didn't read the book.'

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Partitive with mass noun (unbounded quantity): 'I drank water.'

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Genitive object (used for total objects in some environments) maps to telic, same as accusative.

                    For every datum, the objectCaseToTelicity mapping agrees with the annotated vpTelicity.

                    All partitive data have atelic VP interpretation.

                    All accusative data have telic VP interpretation.

                    theorem Karlsson2017.partitive_has_licensor :
                    ((List.filter (fun (x : PartitiveDatum) => x.objectCase == UD.Case.part) allData).all fun (d : PartitiveDatum) => d.licensor.isSome) = true

                    Every partitive datum has a licensor (negation, quantity, or aspect).

                    A morpheme slot in Finnish nominal morphology.

                    Instances For
                      @[implicit_reducible]
                      Equations
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Finnish nominal suffix order (Karlsson §7.1).

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          The Bybee-mappable subset of Finnish nominal slots, in suffix order.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Finnish nominal morphology has exactly 5 suffix slots.

                            Only 3 of 5 nominal slots have Bybee equivalents (stem, number, agreement).

                            The Bybee-mappable nominal slots respect the relevance hierarchy: stem (0) < number (3) < agreement (8).

                            Case has no Bybee category — this is the gap that Finnish nominal morphology reveals in Bybee's verb-centric hierarchy.

                            Clitic is also outside Bybee's scope.

                            Number (rank 3) is more stem-relevant than possessive agreement (rank 8), consistent with number appearing closer to the stem in Finnish.