Docs / Morphology / Paradigm / Morphome

Morphomes: syncretism classes with no natural characterization

import Linglib.Morphology.Paradigm.Morphome · namespace Morphology

A realization map p : Cell → F assigns a form to each paradigm cell. Its syncretism relation — cells receiving the same form — is the kernel setoid Setoid.ker p, and the syncretism classes are its equivalence classes. A morphome (Aronoff 1994 coined the term) is a systematic syncretism that does not define a natural class; Herce 2023 adopts the working definition "a systematic morphological syncretism which does not define a (syntactically or semantically) natural class" (Trommer 2016, quoted approvingly).

Naturalness is a parameter Natural : Set Cell → Prop, not stipulated here. Herce 2023 operationalizes a natural class as one "coextensive with a value (e.g. SG) or conjunction of values (e.g. 1SG)" and treats naturalness as gradient, so Natural is best read as a threshold slice of that scale; the value-or-conjunction predicate is its canonical instantiation, IsValueConjunction: the cells agreeing with some cell on some of the paradigm's features, each feature given as the partition of cells it induces. Systematicity — recurrence of the pattern under more than one exponent or allomorph — is a separate criterion the consumer establishes.

Two limitations, per Baerman 2015's three-way analysis space for syncretism (morphosyntactic identity / underspecification / morphological stipulation, p. 146): an elsewhere form's fiber is typically also nontrivial and non-natural (one specified cell, the default covers the unnatural rest — Skou, p. 145), so IsMorphome is necessary but not sufficient for stipulation-hood; distinguishing the two needs opposition structure or the systematicity criterion above. And directional syncretism (a cell wearing another cell's form "in place of the expected" one, p. 142) is invisible to the symmetric kernel.

The vocabulary here is deliberately just "morphome": Herce 2023 rejects Round's rhizomorphome metamorphome meromorphome subdivision as needless jargon, and "metasyncretism" does not appear in the book.

Main declarations

Declarations

L63–65
L72–74

The cells a table p gives the form f, where a cell may have no form or several: the Finset face of a defective or overabundant paradigm, and of a segmented realization at one of its exponents.

def formCellsOfL76–80
{Cell : Type u_1} {F : Type u_2} [Fintype Cell] [DecidableEq F] (p : Cell → Finset F) (f : F) :
Finset Cell

Used by mem_formCellsOf

Used in Fragments/Romance/Italian/Pronouns, Syntax/Category/Pronoun/Basic, Syntax/Category/Pronoun/Personal, Allotey2021, DalrympleKaplan2000

L82–84
L86–88

A morphome (Herce 2023): a syncretism class of p that groups more than one cell (Set.Nontrivial) yet is not a Natural class — a grouping visible only in the realization, with no phonological, syntactic, or semantic characterization (Aronoff 1994's "morphology by itself"). Natural is a parameter (see the module docstring).

def IsMorphomeL90–96
{Cell : Type u_1} {F : Type u_2} (p : Cell → F) (Natural : Set Cell → Prop) (c : Set Cell) :
  • IsMorphome p Natural c = (c ∈ (Setoid.ker p).classes ∧ c.Nontrivial ∧ ¬Natural c)

Used by isMorphome_syncretismClass, isMorphome_of_formCells

Used in Herce2023, JackendoffAudring2020

L104–110

Natural classes as value conjunctions

Herce 2023 takes a natural class to be one "coextensive with a value or conjunction of values". A paradigm's features are the partitions of its cells they induce, the kernels of the feature projections; a value conjunction is then the set of cells agreeing with some cell on some of the features.

L126–131