World-ordering semantics: the l-lifting as a comparative-probability model #
[lewis-1973]'s comparative possibility lifts an ordering of worlds to an
ordering of propositions (dominationLift); [holliday-icard-2013] (§5) take it
as a semantics for comparative epistemic modals with complete logic WJR
([halpern-2003] Thm. 7.5.1). This file gives the model-theoretic content of that
completeness: a monotone, transitive comparison relation is an l-lifting of some
reflexive world relation iff it satisfies right-union (axiom J) and
determination by singletons.
Main statements #
strict_dominationLift_iff— over a total world relation the strict lift is Lewis's ∃∀ clause.exists_dominationLift_repr,dominationLift_repr_iff— the WJR representation and its round trip.
Over a total relation, the strict l-lifting collapses to Lewis's ∃∀ comparative possibility: some A-point strictly dominates every B-point.
Theorem 2 ([halpern-2003], Thm. 7.5.1a; [holliday-icard-2013]): a monotone, transitive comparison relation satisfying J (right-union) and DS (determination by singletons) is representable by Lewis's l-lifting from a reflexive preorder on worlds.
The paper states this as a logic completeness theorem for WJR (K + BT + Tran + J + Mon + R). We prove the underlying per-model representation result, which is the model-theoretic core: the semantic hypotheses correspond to WJR's axioms evaluated on a single model, without formalizing the syntax or proof system.
Construction: ge_w u v := ge {u} {v}.
Round trip of exists_dominationLift_repr: a monotone, transitive
comparison relation is representable by Lewis's l-lifting iff it
satisfies right-union and determination by singletons — the
model-theoretic form of soundness and completeness for WJR
([holliday-icard-2013]; [halpern-2003] Thm. 7.5.1). Soundness transfers
dominationLift_rightUnion and dominationLift_determinedBySingletons
across the representation.