Pipil Auxiliary Verb Fragment #
@cite{anderson-2006}
Pipil (Uto-Aztecan; El Salvador) has two distinct AVC constructions in @cite{anderson-2006}, with different auxiliaries:
- LEX-headed CAPABILITY AVC (Campbell 1985: 139). Capability auxiliary weli uninflected; LV carries subject agreement.
- SPLIT/DOUBLED PROGRESSIVE AVC (Ch 5 §5.2.2, ex. 133a-c, p. 224). Progressive auxiliary yu (← 'go'); subjects doubly marked on AUX and LV; objects only on LV. AUX root yu encodes prospective TAM lexically. Source: Campbell 1985: 137-138, cited in @cite{anderson-2006}.
The 0.230.576 meta-audit caught an earlier docstring overreading of Anderson p. 220-221 fn. 6: that footnote contrasts two variants of the progressive AVC (lex-headed vs split/doubled, both with yu-class auxiliaries) — NOT weli (CAP) vs yu (PROG). The weli and yu forms are different AVCs entirely, not two patterns of the same AVC.
The earlier classification of the second pattern as plain .split
with distribution {onAux := [.tense], onLex := [.agreement]} was
incorrect on two counts: (i) Anderson p. 224 explicitly classifies
it as split/doubled with subjects "doubly marked"; (ii) the
distribution {onAux := [.tense], onLex := [.agreement]} contradicts
the gloss 1-AUX 1-2PL-show which shows the 1 (subject) prefix
on BOTH elements. Audit fix: 2026-04-30.
Equations
- Fragments.Pipil.AuxiliaryVerbs.family = "Uto-Aztecan"
Instances For
Equations
- Fragments.Pipil.AuxiliaryVerbs.location = "El Salvador"
Instances For
Lex-headed pattern (Anderson 2006; Campbell 1985: 139) #
Lex-headed AVC form: capability auxiliary weli uninflected; subject marking on the lexical verb. weli ni-nehnemi wehka 'CAP 1-walk far' 'I can walk far' (Campbell 1985: 139, cited in @cite{anderson-2006}).
Equations
- Fragments.Pipil.AuxiliaryVerbs.lexHeadedForm = "weli ni-nehnemi wehka"
Instances For
Equations
- Fragments.Pipil.AuxiliaryVerbs.lexHeadedGloss = "CAP 1-walk far 'I can walk far'"
Instances For
Lex-headed inflection: AUX uninflected, LV hosts subject agreement.
Equations
Instances For
Split/doubled pattern (Anderson 2006 Ch 5 ex. 133a, p. 224) #
Split/doubled AVC form (Anderson Ch 5 ex. 133b, p. 224).
n-yu ni-mitsin-ilwitia
'1-AUX 1-2PL-show'
'I'm going to show you'
(Campbell 1985: 137, cited in @cite{anderson-2006}).
Subject 1 (1sg) is doubly marked: as n- on AUX and as ni-
on LV. Object -mitsin- (2pl) appears only on the LV. The AUX
root yu (a grammaticalized form of the motion verb 'go')
encodes the prospective-future TAM lexically. Anderson p. 224:
"Subjects are doubly marked... while objects occur only on
lexical verbs."
Equations
- Fragments.Pipil.AuxiliaryVerbs.splitDoubledForm = "n-yu ni-mitsin-ilwitia"
Instances For
Equations
- Fragments.Pipil.AuxiliaryVerbs.splitDoubledGloss = "1-AUX 1-2PL-show 'I'm going to show you'"
Instances For
Split/doubled inflection: subject agreement doubled on both AUX
and LV; object agreement appears only on LV. The role-typed
encoding (subj vs obj) makes the Anderson Ch 5 §5.2 "objects on
LV only" generalization directly Lean-checkable: see
Phenomena/AuxiliaryVerbs/Studies/Anderson2006.lean.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Primary pattern alias #
The split/doubled pattern is what Anderson Ch 5 §5.2.2 highlights for Pipil; the lex-headed weli pattern is the chapter-3 alternative flagged in Anderson's footnote 6 on p. 220-221 as a co-existing construction. The Anderson 2006 study file consumes both.