Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Pipil.AuxiliaryVerbs

Pipil Auxiliary Verb Fragment #

@cite{anderson-2006}

Pipil (Uto-Aztecan; El Salvador) has two distinct AVC constructions in @cite{anderson-2006}, with different auxiliaries:

The 0.230.576 meta-audit caught an earlier docstring overreading of Anderson p. 220-221 fn. 6: that footnote contrasts two variants of the progressive AVC (lex-headed vs split/doubled, both with yu-class auxiliaries) — NOT weli (CAP) vs yu (PROG). The weli and yu forms are different AVCs entirely, not two patterns of the same AVC.

The earlier classification of the second pattern as plain .split with distribution {onAux := [.tense], onLex := [.agreement]} was incorrect on two counts: (i) Anderson p. 224 explicitly classifies it as split/doubled with subjects "doubly marked"; (ii) the distribution {onAux := [.tense], onLex := [.agreement]} contradicts the gloss 1-AUX 1-2PL-show which shows the 1 (subject) prefix on BOTH elements. Audit fix: 2026-04-30.

Lex-headed pattern (Anderson 2006; Campbell 1985: 139) #

Lex-headed AVC form: capability auxiliary weli uninflected; subject marking on the lexical verb. weli ni-nehnemi wehka 'CAP 1-walk far' 'I can walk far' (Campbell 1985: 139, cited in @cite{anderson-2006}).

Equations
Instances For
    Equations
    Instances For

      Split/doubled pattern (Anderson 2006 Ch 5 ex. 133a, p. 224) #

      Split/doubled AVC form (Anderson Ch 5 ex. 133b, p. 224). n-yu ni-mitsin-ilwitia '1-AUX 1-2PL-show' 'I'm going to show you' (Campbell 1985: 137, cited in @cite{anderson-2006}). Subject 1 (1sg) is doubly marked: as n- on AUX and as ni- on LV. Object -mitsin- (2pl) appears only on the LV. The AUX root yu (a grammaticalized form of the motion verb 'go') encodes the prospective-future TAM lexically. Anderson p. 224: "Subjects are doubly marked... while objects occur only on lexical verbs."

      Equations
      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For

          Split/doubled inflection: subject agreement doubled on both AUX and LV; object agreement appears only on LV. The role-typed encoding (subj vs obj) makes the Anderson Ch 5 §5.2 "objects on LV only" generalization directly Lean-checkable: see Phenomena/AuxiliaryVerbs/Studies/Anderson2006.lean.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Primary pattern alias #

            The split/doubled pattern is what Anderson Ch 5 §5.2.2 highlights for Pipil; the lex-headed weli pattern is the chapter-3 alternative flagged in Anderson's footnote 6 on p. 220-221 as a co-existing construction. The Anderson 2006 study file consumes both.