Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Mongolian.Case

Mongolian Case System #

@cite{gong-2022} @cite{baker-vinokurova-2010}

Mongolian (Khalkha/Chakhar) uses a hybrid case assignment system:

This hybrid system is the key to understanding Condition C reconstruction effects in Mongolian scrambling (@cite{gong-2022}): because ACC is a dependent case, it can be assigned at intermediate positions on a scrambling chain (wherever a case competitor exists), providing the case positions needed for Wholesale Late Merger.

Scrambling types #

Mongolian has three clause-internal scrambling types (short, intermediate, long-distance) and two clause-external types (subject and object cross-clausal). All behave like A-movement in terms of anaphor binding and WCO amelioration, but differ in Condition C reconstruction — tracking case positions, not the A/A-bar distinction.

Case assignment rules #

@cite{gong-2022} (26)/(84): a. If two distinct argumental NPs in the same phase are such that NP1 c-commands NP2, value NP2 as ACC, unless NP1 is already marked for case. b. NOM is assigned by finite T. c. DAT is a nonstructural case.

Mongolian case system: accusative alignment with Agree-based NOM and nonstructural DAT.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    Scrambling types in Mongolian, classified by distance and landing site. @cite{gong-2022} section 2.

    • SS : ScrambleType

      Short scrambling: DO moves past IO within the clause.

    • IS : ScrambleType

      Intermediate scrambling: DO moves past the subject to pre-subject position within the clause.

    • LDS : ScrambleType

      Long-distance scrambling: an argument moves out of an embedded finite clause into the matrix clause.

    Instances For
      @[implicit_reducible]
      Equations
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        The grammatical role of the pronoun binder in the base order. This determines which case the binder bears, which in turn determines the structural height of the binder and whether a dependent ACC position exists above it.

        • io : BinderRole

          Indirect object binder (bears DAT, nonstructural).

        • subject : BinderRole

          Subject binder (bears NOM, assigned by T).

        Instances For
          @[implicit_reducible]
          Equations
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Mongolian case inventory. NOM, ACC, GEN, DAT, ABL, INST, COM. @cite{gong-2022}: the cases relevant to scrambling and WLM are NOM (Agree-based), ACC (dependent), and DAT (nonstructural).

            Note: Mongolian lacks a dedicated locative suffix (LOC is expressed via postpositions like deer 'on'), creating a Blake hierarchy gap at rank 3 between DAT (rank 4) and ABL/INST (rank 2). This is a known counterexample to strict hierarchy contiguity.

            Equations
            Instances For

              A Mongolian ditransitive clause has three argumental NPs in the spell-out domain: Subject > DO > IO. The IO bears DAT (nonstructural, so lexically assigned). Subject and DO compete for dependent case.

              Equations
              Instances For
                Equations
                Instances For

                  Dependent ACC is available for the DO: the subject is a caseless NP above it, so dependentAccusative succeeds. This is the key fact that enables WLM above the IO binder.

                  The subject gets NOM (unmarked in an accusative language with no higher competitor). There is no dependent case position above it.

                  IO bears DAT (lexical/nonstructural), so it does not compete for dependent case and does not create a case position.

                  Structural height encoding for Mongolian clause positions. Higher numbers = structurally higher positions.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Case positions available on a scrambling chain in Mongolian.

                    These are derived from the dependent case algorithm, not stipulated:

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Whether WLM predicts Condition C reconstruction in a given scenario. This is the central prediction of @cite{gong-2022}: reconstruction tracks case positions, not scrambling type or A/A-bar status.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Scrambling over IO: WLM bleeds Condition C. @cite{gong-2022} (4), (18b), (27): dependent ACC is available at Spec,VP (derived from do_gets_dependent_acc), so the NP restrictor can merge above the IO binder without violating Condition C.

                        Scrambling over Subject: WLM forces Condition C reconstruction. @cite{gong-2022} (3), (20), (21), (29): no dependent case position exists above the subject (derived from subject_gets_unmarked), so the NP restrictor must merge below the subject binder.

                        PP-scrambling always forces Condition C reconstruction. PPs lack the DP-internal structure (determiner + NP restrictor) required for WLM. @cite{gong-2022} (93)-(94): scrambling of PPs headed by esreg 'against' always shows obligatory reconstruction, regardless of whether the binder is an IO or Subject.

                        Equations
                        Instances For