Q'anjob'al Agreement and Case Fragment #
Agreement morphology and case assignment for Q'anjob'al (Q'anjob'alan, Mayan), following [MT08] and [Ima20]: a high absolutive VSO language whose split ergativity is triggered by the absence of a preverbal aspect marker. Q'anjob'al has the same Set A (ergative) / Set B (absolutive) paradigm as other Mayan languages. Per [MT08] p. 9 it sits in the "Q'anjob'alan group, Q'anjob'alan branch, Western division" of the Mayan family (citing England 1992:21, Kaufman 1974) — alongside the Cholan-Tzeltalan branch (where Chol lives) within Western Mayan.
Main declarations #
Qanjobal.setAExponent,Qanjobal.setBExponent: Set A ergative markers by following-segment environment (pre-consonantal vs pre-vocalic variant shapes) and the Set B absolutive suffixes ([CMPP14] table (13)).Qanjobal.ArgPositionwith.case,.accCase: argument positions and their canonical-ergative and split (extended-ergative) case, shared with Chol viaMayan.ergCaseQanjobalan/Mayan.accCaseQanjobalan.Qanjobal.absPosition: HIGH-ABS morpheme placement.
Implementation notes #
Per [MT08] §1.3, ex. (35), the verbal predicate structure
is Asp + (Particle) + Abs + (Particle) + Erg-Verb + (Particle) + (DIRs), i.e. [Asp] [Abs Erg-Verb] — the high absolutive template,
against Chol's low-absolutive [Aux] [Erg-Verb-Abs]
([VA11] §3.4).
Unlike Chol's aspect-category split (accusative in all non-perfective
aspects), Q'anjob'al splits only in clauses lacking an overt preverbal
aspect marker — "split ergativity occurs in any clause without an
overt preverbal aspect marker" ([MT08] §1.1.1, citing
Mateo 2004a/2007b) — so the imperfective chi- keeps canonical
ergative, and only aspectless contexts (e.g. the lanan progressive)
put Set A on all subjects. The three-branch split survey and the
.gen-vs-.nom discussion live in Fragments/Mayan/Params.lean,
whose Mayan.caseQanjobalan this file consumes.
One real Cholan/Q'anjob'alan difference the shared alignment substrate
does not capture is aspect-marker word class: Chol markers are
auxiliaries (independent words tyi perfective, mi imperfective;
[VA11] §3.4), whereas Q'anjob'al markers are clitics or
"grammaticized particles" ((ma)x- completive, chi/ch- incompletive,
(ho)q- irrealis; [MT08] §1.1.2, Kaufman 1990:71,
Robertson 1992:57). Mayan.caseQanjobalan captures the alignment
facts, not the morpheme-class difference.
Argument positions #
Argument positions, aliased to the canonical
Features.Prominence.ArgumentRole (S/A/P/R/T).
Instances For
Canonical ergative case assignment (clauses with an overt preverbal
aspect marker), shared with Chol via Mayan.ergCaseQanjobalan
(= Alignment.ergative.assignCase).
Equations
Instances For
Split (extended-ergative) case assignment in aspectless contexts,
via the .Prog projection Mayan.accCaseQanjobalan
(= Alignment.extendedErgative.assignCase) — making the
accusative-side parallel with Chol true by construction.
Instances For
Absolutive position (HIGH-ABS) #
HIGH-ABS: absolutive morphemes sit on the aspect marker (pre-stem), from the morpheme order ASP-ABS-ERG-ROOT-SUFFIX.
Equations
Instances For
Person-number paradigm #
Set A (ergative/possessive) markers by following-segment environment ([CMPP14] table (13)). The 3pl cells are discontinuous exponents: person prefix plus the free plural word heb'.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Set B (absolutive) markers: suffixes ([CMPP14] table (13)). The 3pl cell is the free plural word heb' alone (zero person exponence plus the plural particle); 1pl -on is the table's ASCII for -on̈ [-oŋ].
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
3rd person absolutive has zero exponence.
3rd person ergative is s- pre-consonantally, y- pre-vocalically.