Modern Standard Arabic Case Inventory #
@cite{ryding-2005}
Three-case nominal inflection (Ryding §5, p. 165): nominative raf ʿ
(-u), genitive jarr (-i), accusative naSb (-a). Case marking
attaches as a word-final short-vowel suffix on triptote nouns, with
nunation (final -n) on indefinite nouns (Ryding §4.2.1, pp. 162–163).
The diptote declension (Ryding §4.2.1.4 p. 162; §5.4.2 p. 164) and the
sound-feminine-plural pattern (kalimaat-un / kalimaat-in /
kalimaat-in — genitive and accusative syncretized) are documented in
the typology-feature section below as syncretism in selected NP types.
The dual takes its own pair of suffixes: -aani (nom) / -ayni (gen
& acc; Ryding p. 164). The sound-masculine-plural pattern parallels
this with -uuna (nom) / -iina (gen & acc).
Variety scope #
The MSA case system is largely absent from spoken Arabics (Ryding
§5 p. 166: "colloquial forms of Arabic do not have case marking").
This file is therefore MSA-specific; if an Egyptian-Arabic Case
fragment is added later it should expose caseInventory := ∅.
Inventory #
The three-case core: nominative, accusative, genitive (Ryding §5 p. 166).
Equations
Instances For
WALS-typology summary (Chs 49–52) #
These four named values bundle Ryding's §5 description into the typological substrate's per-chapter enums. Each is purely descriptive of the surface system; no theoretical commitment to abstract case or feature-checking.
WALS Ch 49 (number of cases): 3 cases falls into the threeFour bin.
Instances For
WALS Ch 50 (asymmetrical case marking): the sound-feminine plural
(kalimaat-in for both gen and acc), the dual (-ayni for both gen
and acc), the sound-masculine plural (-iina for both gen and acc),
and the diptote declension all collapse case distinctions on selected
NP types. Per Ryding §4.2.1 pp. 162–163 + §5.4.
Equations
Instances For
WALS Ch 51 (position of case affixes): word-final short-vowel suffixes (Ryding §5 p. 166).
Equations
Instances For
WALS Ch 52 (comitative–instrumental): MSA distinguishes them —
maʿa '(together) with' (comitative) vs bi- 'by means of'
(instrumental). Different markers, hence differentiation.